Showing posts with label benign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label benign. Show all posts

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Reach

12.22.19

Katie Holmes

Reach
Higher
达到更高
Dádào gèng gāo
より高く到達する
Yori takaku tōtatsu suru
ps61
Altius semoto

I have hiked into the highlands through rocky terrain.
I saw from a height that gave me a vision of the plains.



Sinai Wilderness

I had been lowered into the mud at the bottom of the cistern.
Deliverance from hunger was not a liberation that I could discern.


Ancient Cistern

I felt my feet slip into the deep dark waters from the mire 
but I was saved with help that made me feel honored with desire.


Dark Waters

I had called for help and was delivered.
I stood on rock with a gratitude that shivered.

Listen to my prayer for salvation with insight, benign Divine Light.
I request your help as darkness increases the length of night.

I will call to you from the heaviness of my heart
from the ends of the earth with a chart for the path of my part.

You set me on a rock that was higher than me
after I cried to you whom I could not see. 

You have been a strong tower against the enemy.
You have provided the remedies for adversity to my destiny.

The flag for the settlement was raised above the dust
to announce the measure of grain for exchange against the rush
for going bust.  

I will dwell in your house forever.
Your help makes my burden feel as light as a feather.

I will hide beneath the cover of your wings
to rejoice in the blessed favor that sings.

How do I get there from here
if I don't offer holiday cheer?

Goodness in life has been an answer to my prayers.
The preservation of your promise has strengthened my care.

The heritage of those who revere your Name
has granted me the capacity to tame ridicule and shame.

You will be given a sign to see the word as witness.
A young woman will bear a son and call him 'God with us.'

The birth of Jesus as the Messiah took place in the conception.
Mary was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit in the creative inception.

The gospel was promised through the prophets in the scriptures done.
Grace to you and peace from the Father and Jesus Christ, the Son.

The gospel needs the Church to nurture growth.
The Church needs the gospel to grow in significance and size to show.

Science holds an elegant place in faith.
It is like a spear thrust that defines a point in space.

Add length of days to life in the line of political succession
that public policy may become an expression of progression.

Let the leadership sit enthroned by grace
to be mindful of kindness for the human race.

Bid love to watch decision with faithfulness
that others may decide to work with gratefulness.

I will sing praise with respect for your Name
that my vows may be fulfilled for success in fair games.

-------------------------

61 Exaudi, Deus
Answer, Light

1 Hear my cry, O God,
and listen to my prayer.
2 I call upon you from the ends of the earth
with heaviness in my heart;
set me upon the rock that is higher than I.
3 For you have been my refuge,
a strong tower against the enemy.
4 I will dwell in your house for ever;
I will take refuge under the cover of your wings.
5 For you, O God, have heard my vows;
you have granted me the heritage of those who fear your Name.
6 Add length of days to the king's life;
let his years extend over many generations.
7 Let him sit enthroned before God for ever;
bid love and faithfulness watch over him.
8 So will I always sing the praise of your Name,
and day by day I will fulfill my vows.

----------------------
=============
----------------------

How do I get there?

Chn.   我如何到达那里?
           Wǒ rúhé dàodá nàlǐ?
Jpn.   どうやってそこまで行くの?
           Dō yatte soko made iku no?
Krn.   내가 거기 어떻게?
           Naega geogi eotteohge?
Ltn.    Quomodo illuc?
Itn.     Come ci arrivo?
Grk.    Πως πάω εκεί?
            Pos páo ekeí?
Spn.    ¿Como llego hasta ahí?
Frn.     Comment puis-je y arriver?
Gmn.   Wie komme ich dort hin?
Hng.     Hogyan jutok oda?
Trk.      Oraya nasıl giderim?
Rsn.     Как туда попасть?
            Kak tuda popast'?

How do I get there from here
if I don't offer holiday cheer?

-------------------------

Abridged Individual Lament of Jeremiah

Higher Ground


Psalm 61

The psalm is in the second of the three sections for the book.

It is addressed to the musical director of the temple. It specifies the use of a stringed instrument (Neginah). It is identified as a psalm of David, but it shares a similarity with the individual lament attributed to Jeremiah when he was thrown into the empty well.

Psalm 40:2

He lifted me up from the pit of destruction, my feet from the miry clay. He set my feet on a rock and made my footsteps firm.

-------------------------

The rock was higher than the depth of the cistern. It was higher than him.

Does the designation psalm of David indicate that there were times when the monarch participated in singing the song in religious devotion in the house dedicated to worship?

There is the distinct possibility that the designation was the reminder of the king's existence, even if he was not physically present. He was present in his absence by virtue of the reference to the name for the first in the line of royal succession.

All the kings in the line were loved by God with respect for the promise of the inheritance.

The prophet Jeremiah had predicted the destruction of Jerusalem. A number of officials were offended by the prediction. They wanted to have him put to death. The king allowed him to be punished by the officials according to their choice. They cast him into an empty well. It was probably no more than 12 feet in depth, but it was higher than his ability to climb out of it.

Jeremiah 38:6

They took Jeremiah and put him into the cistern of Malkijah, the king's son. It was in the courtyard of the guard. They lowered him into the empty well by ropes. There was only mud at the bottom. Jeremiah sank into the mire.

----------------------

The king was Zedekiah. He had said, "Here he is. He is in your hands since the king can do nothing to stop you." (Jer. 38:5)

Zedekiah had been made the king of Judah by Nebuschnezzar, king of Babylon (Jer.37:1). The Babylonians were attacking Jerusalem even though their king of kings had appointed the monarch for Judah.

Their army withdrew when they heard the Pharaoh's army had set out from Egypt. Jeremiah warned that the Babylonians would return. They would not stop the attack until they had destroyed the city and taken the leadership captive. (Jer.37:10)

Jeremiah went to the land of Benjamin to tend to the collection of his inheritance. He was charged with desertion to the Babylonians and detained in a house as a prison. He was taken to the king after some time.

He asked the king what his crime was. How was it that the prediction that the Babylonians would not attack was acceptable?

He asked that he not be returned to the location where he had been detained. He felt that he would be allowed to die. The king had him kept in the courtyard of the guard with orders that he be fed. (Jer.37:21)

The officials argued that Jeremiah should be put to death for his prophesy. They said it discouraged the soldiers and the people with his predicition that Jerusalem would be destroyed. He had also predicted that those who stayed would die by the sword, famine or plague (Jer.38:2). They said that he was not for the people. He was for their ruin.

Jeremiah was put in the muddy cistern indefinitely. Ebed-Melek, an official of the palace, heard of what happened. He petitioned the king for Jeremiah's release. He argued that the prophet would be left to starve. The king sent him with 30 men to pull him out of the cistern before he died. (Jer.38:10)

The king had an honest discussion with the prophet about the predicted outcomes. Jeremiah told him that he would be spared if he surrendered. The women and children would be taken captive, but he would be killed or captured, if not. (Jer.38:23)

Jeremiah was detained in the courtyard of the guard until Jerusalem was taken. (Jer.38:28)

There are a number of references in the psalms regarding the struggle with mire. This verse appears to be a direct reference to the experience of Jeremiah as the prophet. He saw his predicament as a portend of what was to happen to Judah.

The time in captivity would be followed by deliverance. Unsure footing would be replaced with rock as the terra firma.

It was not explicitly predicted that the appointed king would be replaced by a govenor or that the kingdom would become a province in the empire.

Psalm 40:2

He lifted me up from the pit of destruction, my feet from the miry clay. He set my feet on a rock and made my footsteps firm.

----------------------

This statement was modified in another psalm to allude to the sense that the experience of the mire felt like it was coming before something even worse. The reader is asked to imagine the sensation of sinking from mud into deep water where there is no sensation of firmness beneath his feet.

Psalm 69:2

I have sunk into the miry depths where there is no footing. I have drifted into deep waters where the floods have engulfed me.

----------------------

If you can swim, the experience isn't as frightening as it would be for someone who hasn't been taught. Being able to swim could make the difference between making it to safety and drowning in the depth of water. Fear is a determinant factor.

Psalm 69:14

Rescue me from the mire and do not let me sink. Deliver me from my foes and from deep waters.

----------------------

Knowledge of how to swim allows for the confidence that solid ground will be found. Fear contributes to panic. Panic is likely to result in unconsciousness or death due to water being taken into the lungs. 

The lungs aren't able to extract oxygen from the water. They can take it from the air.

Psalm 61 is short. It is not as descriptive as other laments. It anticipates deliverance efficiently. It anticipates it anywhere in the world.

The suggestion offered by the statement that he will cry from the end of the earth suggests that prayer for salvation can be offered from any location at any time that the heart feels overwhelmed.

The request to be led to the rock that is higher than I is based on the experience of standing on solid ground.

Anyone who has hiked to higher terrain can tell you that height gives you the ability to see the surrounding area. The sight of that which exists below gives perspective, provided that there is enough light to see.

The higher rock became a metaphor for defense. Build a castle on the highest ground in the area and you can visually anticipate the movement of an army.

This metaphor represented the vision of that which could be constructed, but it was based on the relation of the thought of the brain as higher than the feelings of the heart.

--------------------

Ask for a sign

 

The Assyrians invaded the Northern Kingdom in 737 BCE. King Menahem of Israel (743-738) became a vassal of the Assyrians.

He made two tribute payments to Assyrian King Tiglath-Pileser III according to Assyrian annals. He paid the tribute for the political support of Assyria to continue to rule with "a thousand talents of silver" (2 Kgs. 15:19-20).

Menahem was succeeded by his son Pekahiah (2 Kgs. 15:23-26). He was assassinated by Pekah son of Remaliah (737).

Pekah decided to resist the Assyrians. He made an alliance with Razon, the king of Damascus. When King Ahaz refused to join the alliance they joined forces to attack Judah. Modern historians call attack the Syro-Ephraimite War (735-734).

Judah was faced with invasion by its northern neighbors, Israel (Ephraim) and Aram-Damascus (Syria).

Isaiah took his young son with him to meet King Ahaz. Isaiah's son's name was Shear-Jashub. It meant "a remnant will return." The boy was a visual reminder of God's mercy in His promise of the preservation of a faithful remnant.

The destruction of Judah's enemies was prophesied by Isaiah prior to the conquest of Syria by Assyria in 733 BCE. (Isa. 7:1-10)

Isaiah delivered a message to Ahaz that invited him to ask for a sign to test the truth of the prophesy. (Isa. 7:11) Ahaz refused. He said that he would not test God. Isaiah replied that his sign would be the birth of a child.

The mother would call the child Immanuel, meaning "God with us." (Isa. 7:13-14)  It was predicted that by the time he was eating curds with honey with the knowledge to reject the bad, Ephraim and Syria would be destroyed.

The word almah in the original Hebrew of Isaiah 7:14 meant a young woman of childbearing age who had not yet given birth, however the Greek translation in the Septuagint rendered it as parthenos.

The word means 'virgin.' Jesus was interpreted as the fulfillment of the Immanuel prophesy in the gospel of Matthew. (Matt.1:23)

Isaiah 7:14

Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son. She will name him Immanuel.

-----------------------

You will be given a sign to see the word as witness.
A young woman will bear a son and call him 'God with us.'

=================

Grace to you


The  expression "son of man" (ben-'adam) appears 107 times in the Hebrew Bible. This is the most common construction for the singular reference to human nature. It appears 93 times in the Book of Ezekiel alone. It is used only 14 times elsewhere.

The phrase appears in intermediate plural form "sons of men" in 32 cases. As generally interpreted by Jews, The title "son of man" denotes humanity in contrast to deity or godhead. There is special reference to weakness and frailty by contrast.

The title is used by "God" in reference to Ezekiel in the book that goes by the name of the prophet. Ezekiel was the prophet in the sense that he was the representative of being human.

The title takes on greater significance in the Book of Daniel. One like the son of man came to the Ancient of Days and  was presented before him. He was given dominion, glory and a kingdom that the people of all nations and languages were to serve.  His kingdom was indestructible.

The imperial title "son of god" wasn't regarded as acceptable to Judaic monotheism. Opposition to the concept of the god-man marks the distinction between the Judaic and Islamic religions with Christianity.

It is conceivable that the notion of the emperor as the son of heaven started with the Chinese, moved to the Middle East and was adopted by the Romans by way of the Greeks.

The expression "son of man" occurs 81 times in the Greek text of the four Canonical gospels. The Son of Man had the power to heal with the forgiveness of sin. He came to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.

Jesus came from humble circumstance. He was like Gautama Siddhartha after he left his royal station.

The use of the definite article for the Son of man in the Koine Greeek of the Christian gospels is original. There are not records of its use in any of the surviving documents of antiquity.

The title was shortened to the Son during the time of the apostles. The development of the theology for the Son of God would not be officially developed and accepted as Christian until the Council of Nicea in 324 CE.

When Jesus used a title to describe himself, he spoke of the Son of Man. When he was called the Son of God it was ascribed to him by others. He simply said that you had so stated it.

The profession of Jesus as the Son of God has been an essential element of Christian creeds since the end of the Apostolic age when Constantine embraced the Christian faith as the official religion for the empire.

Such professions were not applied to the acceptance of Jesus as the Son of Man. The expression was taken as Jesus self-designation as a continuation of the revelation of the truth of the law and the prophets.

It is likely that the preamble to the greeting to "all God's beloved in Rome" was added after Christian scripture was officially designated as the text for the imperial religion.  Religion did not present as a problem in society until the official form was treated as the only legal kind.

Such treatment was sectarian. It suggested that other forms were officially interpreted as an indication of rebellion or treason. The emphasis of the reformed epistemology is such that Christianity can be favored in debate, but the free will defense allows for other forms as legal provided they don't organize for riot, rebellion, revolution, world war or terrorism.

Romans 1:1-7

Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which was promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy scriptures, the gospel concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh and was declared to be Son of God with power according to the spirit of holiness by resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles for the sake of his name, including yourselves who are called to belong to Jesus Christ,

To all God's beloved in Rome, who are called to be saints:
Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

-----------------------

The gospel was promised through the prophets in the scriptures done.
Grace to you and peace from the Father and Jesus Christ, the Son.

==============

God Saves


The word almah occurs 9 times in the Hebrew Bible.

The prophesy in Isaiah 7:14 is one of those. The examples that precede that period of the timeline give an indication of the role of women in the society. They also lend meaning to the definition for almah.

Abraham had sent a servant to seek a wife in his former homeland. The servant told his master how he had prayed that should an almah provide his camel and him with water from the well, he would take that as a sign that she was to be the wife of Isaac. Rebecca was the young unmarried woman. (Gen.24:14)

The heading for Psalm 46 notes that the song is to be played on alamot. It could have been a reference to a special selection of women's voices or an instrument made in the city of "Alameth". It is likely that women in Hebrew culture celebrated life with music.

The alamot are listed in Psalm 68:25 as participants in a victory parade. They are listed after the singers and musicians. They were designated as the players with cymbals or tambourines.

A man with a young woman was described as something difficult to understand in Proverbs 30:19. The Septuagint translated the text to the way of a man in his youth. Proverbs was probably written after the time of Ahaz, but the sense of unpredictability was associated with youth and the future.

Isaiah 7:14 tells how the pregnancy of an almah will be the sign that the enemies of Judah will be destroyed before the son of the virgin grows much in age. Israel and Syria fell to Assyria within a few years.

Aram-Damascus, under Rezin, and Israel, under Pekah, attempted to depose Ahaz through an invasion in 735.

Judah was being defeated according to 2 Chronicles. Officials were killed including the king's son. Others were taken away as slaves. The Second Book of Kings states that Rezin and Pekah besieged Jerusalem but failed to capture it. (2 Kgs.16:5 )

The Assyrians defended Judah.  Israel, Aram-Damascus and the Philistines were defeated in a number of years after the start of the assault (736-732). The post-war alliance brought trouble to the king of Judah.

Ahaz had to pay tribute to Tiglath-Pileser III with treasures from the Temple in Jerusalem and the royal treasury. He also built idols of Assyrian gods in Judah to find favor with his new ally.

The Northern Kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Neo-Assyrian monarchs, Tiglath-Pileser III (Pul) and Shalmaneser V. The later Assyrian rulers Sargon II and his son, Sennacherib, were responsible for finishing the 20 year demise of Israel's northern ten-tribe kingdom. These would come to be known as the Ten Lost Tribes.

Forced relocation for captivity began about 740 BCE. The ruling city of the Northern Kingdom, Samaria, was finally taken in 722 by Sargon II after a three-year siege started by Shalmaneser V.

The Fall of Assyria is conventionally dated between 613 and 611. The year in between is the most supported date. An allied army that combined the forces of Medes and the Babylonians with Scythians and Cimmerians besieged Nineveh in 612.

The fall of Nineveh led to the destruction of the Neo-Assyrian Empire over the next three years as the dominant state in the Ancient Near East.

Babylon became the imperial center of Mesopotamia for the first time in over a 1000 years. The Neo-Babylonian Empire claimed imperial continuity as a new dynasty.

The prediction that Assyria would fall as one of the enemies took place over a longer period in time. It took over a century for fulfillment. Babylon would fall to the Achaemenid empire in 539 well after the destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BCE.

The prophesy of Isaiah had relied on the predictability of success in forming alliance with the dominant power for the time.

The image of the almah had acquired a great deal of power in the time between the Assyrian and Roman dominance.

If Isaiah had meant that the young woman had not had sexual relations, the word betulah was more common. There here are two types of betulot in the Hebrew scriptures. The true virgin and the “betrothed virgin” (betulah m’orashah) are both cited.

The state of betrothal was as serious as the married state. The difference between the two in certain cases was treated as a formality.

The Greek translation of the Jewish text made in pre-Christian Alexandria took almah to mean “virgin”.

The author for the gospel of Matthew carefully explains that Mary had been engaged to Joseph before they lived together. The conception of Jesus as Christ was described as from the Holy Spirit.

This was to become the Roman theological preservation of respect for the psychological and social values associated with polytheistic mythology. Faith in one God preserves retentiveness about the historical development of society from the primitive to the civilized state.

Matt. 1:18

Now the birth of Jesus the Messiah took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been engaged to Joseph, but before they lived together, she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit.

-----------------------

The birth of Jesus as the Messiah took place in the conception.
Mary was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit in the creative inception.

===============

Science and Religion


Ruth Elaine Younger
b. 10.1.1897  New York City, New York
d. 12.22.1986 New York, NY

Ruth Elaine Younger was an Anglican nun, organizer and educator. Her dedication to the faith was an example to others. She searched for knowledge to overcome adversity with pleasantness. She provided instruction for the good life justified by faith with grace.

The book of Ruth provided her with a model for choice. Ruth chose to work with pleasantness despite the adversity that she experienced.

It was in the time when her life was unorganized in a society that had replaced tribalism with ethnic nationalism. She traveled to a different country to learn to cope with the life in which she had been raised.

People organized in relation to the political leader who had a plan to respond to the reported crisis.

Life in New York was ordered by ethnic dominance.

The ethnicity of the predominant political leader determined a hierarchy of favor in relation to the appearance of likeness in the social structure.

Sister Ruth used her religious discipline to consider what was best for education in religious values for the public.  This was her emphasis on community organization for the benefit of the state.

She founded a school in New York before she organized a religious community.  Her name was changed from Sister to Mother Ruth after she was made the Reverend Mother for the community.

Her life was dedicated to instruction in the faith with pleasantness.

New York City

When New York was named New Amsterdam it was a test case for a colony of the Dutch Republic in the new world. The monarchy had been defined as corrupt in imitation of what the Romans had done in order to promote their republic.

The 'Dutch bet' was based on the control of political administration by an organization that was designated for business.

The consequence was that the business administrator was the state official who made public decisions for the benefit of his trade. The "official" wore hats for the control of trade and municipality in the competition for dominance in the world.

The British eventually purchased the city as it was surrounded by a number of their larger territorial claims.

The British had retained a monarch, but the government decisions regarding the people were largely determined by the House of Commons and the liberal power of the Whig alliance with French and Dutch Protestants for Republic.

The population for the Protestant Republic was more largely uneducated than the Roman kind had been.

Bible study was supposed to be informed by the logic of Aristotle, but most Calvinists were not well educated. They held little interest in the cultural wealth of knowledge or higher knowledge. They had the distinct sense that Calvinism put the control of government in the hands of the local council.

Stories about witch hunts were replaced by those of the threat of savagery from the natives or a foreign power. The competition between kingdoms and republics made the threat more real than it had been. Dictatorship by the barely literate prevailed as democracy. 

Politics in New York City in the 19th century was controlled by the Tammany Society. This group wasn't limited to NYC.

The defining purpose of the Tammany Societies was to delight in all things Native American. Titles, seasons, rituals, language, costumes and so forth were viewed as tribal and democratic. Those who joined the society were self-identified as pure Americans.

Fernando Wood was the son of Quakers. Quakers were usually of German descent. His father failed at business. Fernando attempted to establish a number of businesses from 13 years of age.

He became a member of the Tammany Society at the age of 24. He won an election to the US House of Representatives in 1841, but lost the next one 2 years later. He won the election for mayor in 1854.

This instituted the Hall as a dominant social force in the political order. The new mayor declared that his goal was the same as his predecessor. He wanted to fight the corruption of the police force.

Many Irish families were forced to emigrate from the country as a result of the Great Famine in Ireland (1845-1849). The famine was caused by a potato blight. Between 1.5 and 2 million Irish had left their country by 1854. 

Most became city dwellers. They had little money so they often settled where the ships landed.
The Irish came to make up about a quarter of the population for the major port cities of Boston, New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore.

Boston currently has the largest percentage of Irish Americans whereas New York City has the most in raw numbers.

The popular vote in elections doesn't have a way to correct for error when it comes to lack of qualifications for office.

Tammany Hall celebrated tribal organization, but there wasn't anything to speak of with respect for educational attainment in law, political science or history.

Employment experience in relation to political office was not a consideration. Partisan party politics became the name of the game. The best candidates could be defeated by bad press, stage events and claims of corruption.

William Boss Tweed was of Scottish descent. He was most likely a Presbyterian, but he didn't have the education to prepare him to serve as a political leader. He had his participation in the Odd Fellows, the Masons and Tammany Hall and his efforts at establishing a business.

He won a 2 year term of office for the US House of Representatives in 1852. He was declared an attorney by a judge despite his lack of training in law.

He became a member of the New York State Senate (4th D.) from 1868 to 1873.

He became very wealthy after he was elected mayor for the city in 1869. He sold favor for his office while in power. Tweed's downfall became after riots broke out between Irish Catholics and Protestants over a parade that celebrated a historical victory against Catholicism. 

The Irish became a dominant ethnic group in the city through the political machinery of the Democratic Party in Tammany Hall.

Two Irish born men were elected as mayor before the turn of the century. William Russell Grace was elected from 1885-1886. Thomas F. Gilroy served for a year from 1895-1894.

The Democratic machinery hired a number of Irish to work as police by way of participation in Tammany Hall.

The Irish Democrats were mainly Catholics.

Life
Mother Ruth

Ruth Elaine Younger was born on October 1, 1897 as the third child of an interracial marriage in New York City.

The influx of Irish Catholics after the potato blight may have influenced her decision to seek a life of religious devotion. She moved from New York to Canada to join a monastic order. She entered the Canadian Sisterhood of St. John the Divine in Toronto and was Life Professed on Dec. 29, 1922.

The Sisterhood was founded in Toronto on September 8th, 1884. They have been a prayer and gospel-centered monastic community that answered the call to live their baptismal covenant with the vows of poverty, chastity and obedience.

Her discipline with prayer and the life of devotion helped her to develop the discipline to enter higher education.

She chose to study science as an undergraduate in Canada. She was a graduate of St. Hilda's College, University of Toronto. She received her B.A. degree with honors in natural science.

She obtained her teaching degree at the Ontario College of Education and taught for several years at the Qu'Appelle Diocesan College of Education and at the Bishop Bethune College in Oshawa. She returned to Toronto upon her appointment as treasurer of St. John's Surgical Hospital, she returned to Toronto.

It was prior to her selection of a statement by which she could investigate relevant documents on research for her graduate investigation.

Sister Ruth and Sister Edith Margaret were granted a leave of absence by their Community to begin new work in New York in 1949. They opened St. Hilda's School on Morningside Heights with a class of eight preschool children on February 2, 1950.

The school encouraged and maintained a fully integrated faculty and student body. Sister Ruth was the Headmistress.

The school expanded grade by grade. Co-educational academic training was eventually offered from nursery through grade 12 under the name St. Hilda's and St. Hugh's School.

The Community of the Holy Spirit was formally instituted on Aug. 27, 1952, when their vows were transferred from the Sisterhood of St. John the Divine. Sister Ruth was elected the Reverend Mother of the new Community. She held the office until 1976.

The Community of the Holy Spirit also founded the Melrose School, a country-day school near Brewster, N.Y. and St. Cuthbert's Retreat House also in Brewster. Mother Ruth's direction was necessary for the foundation.

Mother Ruth pursued a course of studies in education at the graduate level at Columbia University in New York. She was awarded Masters and Doctorate degrees.

A life dedicated to investigation is characterized by vision and revision. Assimilation and accommodation to new information contributes to the modification of acquired knowledge.

Mother Ruth applied her knowledge to the administration of her organizational duties. She served as Headmistress of St. Hilda's and St. Hugh's School until her retirement in 1985.

A critical question in the application of scientific inquiry to a life of faith includes the limitation of the investigation to the search for material cause as an expression of the Creator. Theism allows for the contrast of the immaterial with the material universe.

Prayer and faith factor into the search for truth, but it is not generally regarded as an area for evangelical expression.

It is taken as a matter of faith that the investigator is dedicated to finding the truth as an expression of the divine will for how things work in the natural world. Practical value in social or personal dimensions was treated as a goal for the search for objectivity in judgement.

The language used in science is dedicated to the exposition of the state of nature. What is true irrespective of the social or political conditions in the world?

A hypothesis is formed to test the general state of things for a specific outcome. The explanation of determination from the study can be so technical that the meaning defies ordinary levels of comprehension.

A more practical level of application may require tests for personal cognition in an ordinary place like a household.

There is an advantage to the scientific method in the step that is taken outside of partial judgment, but there is a consequence in the level of abstraction for practical benefit.

The study of education includes a survey of literature. The assessment of what others have found with respect for research is helpful in the determination of practical value.

An individual's quest for knowledge can serve as a source of information that can be shared in the context of community life.

Ruth Elaine Younger was dedicated to helping her students grow into responsible adults as faithful citizens in Christ.

Mother Ruth died on Dec. 22, 1986, after a two-month illness.

----------------------

Ruth Younger
S. 露丝·雅戈尔
T. 露絲·雅戈爾

露 Lu   expose       露  ro    dew                                Ru  る-      ル-          Lu     루   sack         
丝 si    thread         絲  shi   thread                            su    す       ス           seu     스  s         
雅 Ya   elegant       雅  ga    gracious                        Yan  やん ヤン       Yeong  영  spirit   
戈  ge  spear          戈  ka    battleaxe w spear           gu    ぐ       グ                                         
尔  er   you             爾  ji     you                                             

----------------------

Science holds an elegant place in faith.
It is like a spear thrust that defines a point in space.

================

Lectionary: Ruth Younger
Episcopal Archives
NY Times Obit.: Mother Ruth
Cliff Notes: Raisin in the Sun, Ruth Younger?
Schmoop: Raisin in the Sun: Ruth Younger

-----------------------

The debate between Brunner and Barth defined the direction for the Church in the 20th century.

Brunner was neo-orthodox. Barth was liberal. They both had a strong influence on German theology.

Barth was more popular. Brunner was better for the Church with respect for participation in the nation state.

The Gospel needs the Church to nurture growth.
The Church needs the Gospel to grow in enough significance to show.

Inspiration


Brunner is significant as a Reform theologian because his neo-Orthodoxy was drawn from the gospel. It was presented with respect for the return of Republic as a form for government.

He wasn't just concerned with the authority of local councils. His respect for statecraft and citizenship extended into international relations through the federal level.

The Protestant Reformation had suggested a movement towards science as the means to clarify reconstruction for public benefit.

Calvin's reform movement was bible-based in science for democracy in local councils, but it was antiquated with respect for the political norms documented by the bible.  It entertained sectarian and partisan superstition as a means to make decisions.

Brunner was part of the Swiss Reformed Church started by Zwingli. Zwingli allowed for federation in his political organization. His reform was republican as well as democratic in this sense. It also allowed for monarchy as a form.

The movement towards science as a means for making decisions in the public realm became so pronounced that it facilitated the growth of socialism towards communism.

Science-speak used Greek levels of specificity for the public. Scientific communication could become too obscure for general comprehension or retention.

Government officials came to develop a method of communication that suggested that their responsibilities were too complicated for the public to understand.

Expertise in knowledge of the language regarding particulars was so pronounced that the general public was used to reject concern for the religious population of the nation state.

Political causes were used to divide the general public into factions that could not lay claim to the representation of the constituency.

The extent of the extension of science in the Church denied Christ as God. This was true with respect for Counter-Reformation politics in society as well. The concern for the population outside the Church became so pronounced that the title Son of God was just used to promote secular socialism or populism. Jesus was defined as just a man.

The theology that supported this movement toward communism came to be called liberal by leading Lutherans.

Reason and Revelation
Ch.VII Gifford Lectures Reason and Belief

"Brunner was more interested than Barth in ethics and social movements. Brunner was a steadfast opponent of communism, while Barth, to the indignation of political thinkers like Reinhold Niebuhr, was strangely complaisant toward it."

The debate presented a strange contrast in neo-Lutheran Orthodoxy.

Communism was an atheist state. It was the Marxist extension of liberal Protestant or Counter Reformation theology. The communists sought to replace religion with science. There was an unexpected benefit in the application of dialectic in a scientific and conservative way in order to promote responsible statecraft and citizenship with reasonable political theory.

Winterthur

Winterthur reached 100,000 residents in 2008. It is located near Zurich. It is considered to be a satellite within the municipality. It is about 20 kilometres (12 mi) to northeast of downtown Zürich. It is the sixth largest population in the country.

The population is currently estimated to be over 108,000. The economy is oriented to service and high tech industrial products.

The official language is the Swiss variety of standard German. The main spoken language is a variant of the Alemannic Swiss German dialect.

Napoleonic troops liberated the city from the control of Zurich in 1798.  Winterthur lies at the junction of seven cross-roads near Zürich.  The army that held the town held the access to most of Switzerland and points crossing the Rhine into southern Germany.

The forces involved were small, but the ability of the Austrians to sustain an 11-hour assault against the French line on the plateau north of Zürich resulted in the consolidation of three Austrian forces. This led to the French defeat a few days later.

The area became an industrial town when companies like Sulzer, Rieter and SLM built large industrial plants in the 19th century.

The town suffered from investments and loans to the National Railway as a private enterprise. A guarantee for the loan of nine million francs was made in 1874 with three other towns. The co-guarantor towns were unable to pay their share.

The entire burden fell on Winterthur. It had to sell its shares in the line in 1878. There were difficulties from 1881 to 1885 as the town struggled to meet its liabilities. It was helped by loans from the cantonal and federal governments.

The City Council (Stadtrat) constitutes the executive government of the City of Winterthur and operates as a collegiate authority. It is composed of seven councilors. Each presides over a department.

Emil Brunner

Emil Brunner was born in Winterthur in 1889.

He studied at the universities of Zurich and Berlin. He received his doctorate in theology from Zurich in 1913. His dissertation was on The Symbolic Element in Religious Knowledge.

Brunner served as pastor from 1916 to 1924 in the mountain village of Obstalden in the Swiss Canton of Glarus. In 1919–1920 he spent a year in the United States studying at Union Theological Seminary in New York.

He studied at the universities of Zurich and Berlin, receiving his doctorate in theology from Zurich in 1913, with a dissertation on The Symbolic Element in Religious Knowledge.

He served as pastor from 1916 to 1924 in the mountain village of Obstalden in the Swiss Canton of Glarus.  He spent a year in the United States studying at Union Theological Seminary in New York in 1919–1920.

Brunner published his Habilitationsschrift in 1921. This was a post-doctoral dissertation traditionally required in many countries in order to attain the position of a fully tenured professor. His paper was on Experience, Knowledge and Faith. He was appointed a Privatdozent at the University of Zurich in 1922.

Another book followed soon after. Mysticism and the Word (1924) was a critique of the liberal theology of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Brunner was appointed Professor of Systematic and Practical Theology at the University of Zurich in 1924.

He held the post until his retirement in 1953. He published The Philosophy of Religion from the Standpoint of Protestant Theology and The Mediator in 1927.

Brunner published God and Man in 1930 after accepting various invitations to deliver lectures across Europe and the United States. The Divine Imperative was published in 1932. Brunner continued his theological output with Man in Revolt and Truth as Encounter in 1937.

He was a substantial contributor to the World Conference on Church, Community, and State in Oxford in the same year. This position reflected his continued involvement in the ecumenical movement.  He returned to the United States for a year as a visiting professor at Princeton Theological Seminary in 1937–1938.

Brunner's ecclesiastical positions varied at differing points in his career. He returned to Europe before the outbreak of the war with the young Scottish theologian Thomas F. Torrance. Torrance had studied under Karl Barth in Basel. He had been teaching at Auburn Theological Seminary, New York.

He would subsequently go on to distinguish himself as a professor at the University of Edinburgh.
Brunner delivered the prestigious Gifford Lectures at the University of St Andrews, Scotland in 1946–1947 on Christianity and Civilisation following the war.

He retired from his post at the University of Zurich in 1953. He was invited to take a position as a Visiting Professor at the recently founded International Christian University in Tokyo, Japan (1953–1955).

The first two of his three volume magnum opus Dogmatics were published before he accepted the position. Volume one was The Christian Doctrine of God (1946). Volume two was The Christian Doctrine of Creation and Redemption (1950). Volume three was published in 1960 as The Christian Doctrine of the Church, Faith, and Consummation.

Brunner suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and was physically impaired while returning to Europe. It weakened his ability to work. There were times when his condition would improve, but he suffered further strokes. He finally died in 1966.

Heinrich Emil Brunner was a Swiss Protestant (Reformed) theologian. He is commonly associated with neo-orthodoxy or the dialectical theology movement with Karl Barth.

Brunner holds a place of prominence in Protestant theology in the 20th century. He was one of the four or five leading systematicians. He rejected liberal theology's portrait of Jesus as merely a highly respected human being. He insisted that Jesus was God incarnate and central to salvation.

Brunner and his compatriots in the neo-orthodox movement rejected in toto Pelagian concepts of human cooperation with God in the act of salvation. Pelagian concepts had an association with slavery in republic.

These kind of concepts were prominent in other humanist conceptions of Christianity in the late 19th century. Brunner and associates embraced Augustine's views, especially as refracted through Martin Luther.

Brunner re-emphasized the centrality of Christ. Evangelical and fundamentalist theologians mainly from America and Great Britain have usually rejected Brunner's dismissal of certain miraculous elements within the Scriptures.

Arch-conservatives afforded others in the neo-orthodox movement such as Barth and Paul Tillich a similar treatment. Some conservatives have viewed neo-orthodox theology as simply a more moderate form of liberalism.  They rejected its claims as a legitimate expression of the Protestant tradition.

---------------------

Emil Brunner
S. 埃米尔·布鲁纳
T. 埃米爾·布魯納

埃 Ai     dust                        埃  ai      dust                    E     エ    え              E     에  on       
米 mi    rice                         米  bei   meter                   mi   ミ    み              mil  밀  wheat       
尔 er     you                         爾  ji      you                      ru    ル   る              Beu  브  bro               
布 Bu    to announce           布  fu     cloth                    Bu    ブ    ぶ            lu     루 sack           
鲁 lu     stupid                      魯 ro     foolish                 ru     ル   る              neo  너  you               
纳 na    admit                       納  no   settlement            na    ナ-  な-                                       

-----------------------

The flag for the settlement was raised above the dust
to announce the measure of grain for exchange against the rush
for going bust.

================

Josiah Royce
Idealistic Pragmatism
for
Conservative Policy

Josiah Royce was the only major American philosopher who spent a significant period of his life studying and writing history. He taught a course on the history of German thought at John Hopkins after he had studied with Herman Lotze in Germany.

The concept of God lends itself to the interpretation of meaning in time. The analysis of this concept allows for credence in the value of the consideration of the reality of the divine existence.

He offered a lecture on The Conception of God to the Philosophical Union at Berkeley in 1897. He chose to define the concept with respect to the attribute of omniscience. It was knowledge that was presented as a derivative of the predication.

He said, "An Omniscient Being would be one who simply found presented to him, not by virtue of fragmentary and gradually completed processes of inquiry, but by virtue of an all-embracing, direct, and transparent insight into his own truth, — who found thus presented to him, I say, the complete, the fulfilled answer to every genuinely rational question."
(wiki: The Conception of God, Ch.1 text)

-----------------------

Omniscience is not the knowledge of all that will happen before it does.
Free will allows for change in the variable range with respect for what was.

=================

This provides a Being who can answer any question offered for investigation. This was not only Aristotle's favorite attribute. It lent itself to consideration of Christ as the Logos or more abstractly, reason. This was the basis for what Royce called the "religion of loyalty" and any individual's search for knowledge with wisdom.

The will for this paradigm was the inner dynamism that reached beyond itself into a possible future and acted upon an acknowledged past. Space and the abstract descriptions that are appropriate to it are a falsification of the materialistic description of the universe proposed by the Stoics.

Metaphysical error proceeded from taking the abstraction of the material universe literally. The Stoic realism that was later adopted by Locke and the liberal Whigs who represented the Puritans in particular and Calvinists in general served as the motive force for the deception of the public into the support of excessive force in colonialism for slavery with the threat of genocide. 

Idealism without the criticism of this deceptive or fictional story line for dominance held a supporting role in the perpetuation.

The will to act for a practically realistic and possible future based on the acknowledge past was compromised in the process. The demotic populism promoted by liberal power was the greater tyrant who blamed some foreign agent as the greater threat.

The Democrats demonstrated that their majority rule of both the executive branch and Congress defined success in terms of opposition of conservative management policy. Overtures were made toward the elimination of opposition via association with socialist principles derived from the Marxist economic position. 


Oops!


The criticism of writing wasn't the only gaffe in the Phaedrus. Plato set up a false dichotomy behind the main topic of the discourse.

Socrates and Phaedrus spoke about whether or not passionate love was best, but the subtext was about democracy.

Pericles and Protagoras had increased the emphasis on the vote in Athenian society. This was countered by the Spartans with the emphasis on the Persian threat. This was the position that Plato supported.

His argument set up the reader to think that the choice of passion or dispassion in individual feeling regarding partnership defaulted to the choice of dictatorship.

Passionate love supported hormonal consent whereas dispassion resulted in cognitive concession to dependency on the economic providence of the dominant partner. 

All men had the right to vote. That which was presented for the measure of the will of the constituency by election was chosen by the leadership.

The leadership had the advantage of experience in administration, military organization and education.

The problem with this paradigm as Plato described it was that the women chose to associate and agree with women, because they weren't given authority in the decision making process. Men chose to get intimate with other men in order to defend their power.

Octavian chose to place an emphasis on the family when he attained to the august position as the Caesar. This position was added to the republic. The republic was more developed in terms of how citizens could rise to the power of a patrician in Roman society. .

Monarchy had been demonized in the process of making the republic look more desirable than monarchical democracy. Even the executive leadership of the emperor was highly conditioned upon the will of the patricians with significant concession to the demands of the plebians.

The emperor had to rise through the ranks of the patricians, the military or the plebians in the effort to satisfy the public as a constituent body.

One was drawn to lead out of the many. That one had the power to promote a line of succession by adoption as Julius Caesar had done or by family succession. This was the case after Octavian.

While the emperor wasn't elected by the vote of the Senate, he still had to represent the interests of the patricians and plebians or he would suffer assassination or defeat in battle with organizational support from other patricians.
\
There was high risk in volatility that duty tempered by religious devotion to the gods helped to manage.

The Pax Romana offered to assimilate the worship of other gods, but the volatility of the system led to reports of sectarian judgment against monotheistic religion.

The power of the emperor was already thought to be an offense to the authority of the Senate by traditional republicans, but the position was tolerated insofar as it was necessary for competition.

Empire in the Middle East had made more progress in the movement towards adopting monotheism as the form for the official religion. It was the form for the official religion that didn't outlaw other legal types.

Progress in this development could not be successfully dictated by imperial or legislative decree. The primitive tribes in Europe were polytheistic. They were developed into monarchies, because it was regarded as the next stage in organizational development.

This political evolution managed to be successful in the prevention of legislation for the slave trade or slavery. The institution was regarded as an offense to the liberation of the captives as a political achievement by Cyrus as the Christ or Messiah.

Rebellion and revolution were used to re-institute slavery and republic. This was a major regression for European society, but the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people principle for legislation or judgment helped to outlaw slavery and legislate the right to vote for people of color and women.

Constitutional monarchy still represents a more conservative form in terms of cost for executive leadership to the public. Republican leadership has to keep an eye on this form of government in order to stay competitive in the world.

Democrats are currently stuck in Plato's Athenian model for democracy as dictatorship. Organization for the winning the vote is constrained to setting different factions of the public against each other. The only way that they felt that they could win public support was to agree to impeach the president.

They have been operating under the delusion that this action will help them to win executive authority based on concession to the House of Representatives. It has been a developmental delay in the evolution of republic.

The Democrats need to admit that the public is the constituent body for national security. Their staged events for media attacks for the impeachment of the president only factionalizes representation.

Sunday, December 1, 2019

Rebuild

12.8.19
Emily Browning

Rebuild
Zion
重建锡安
Chóngjiàn xī ān
シオンを再構築
Shion o sai kōchiku
ps102
Rebuild Zion

I have a question
regarding the detection
of affection.

May I please have your assistance
in protection from persistence
for the malicious?

Will you help me to work through a crisis
to avert the danger of damage from harmful devices
used to force fortune to submit to prejudiced bias
that acts like a virus?

Please listen when I call.
Help me to make amends when I fall.

My days drift away like smoke.
My bones feel pain that makes pleasure a joke.

My heart was smitten like the grass when withered
like when the snake made time wave when it slithered.

The voice of my groans 
is honed by skin and bones.



I have become like an owl among the ruins
or the vulture in the wilderness far from humans.



I am like the lone sparrow on the house top.
I want to fly to where the line of sight stops.

Those who scoff have taken an oath against me.
My enemies delight in the way that they extol the beastly.

I have mingled tears with my drink.
I have destroyed worlds of thought to think. 

I have eaten crow rolled in ashes for bread
when I had come to regret that which I had said.

I have been lifted up and thrown away
by indignation wrapped in wrath portrayed.

My time passes like a shadow cast.
I wither like the grass that has passed.

Eternity endures forever.
Your name keeps us together.

You will have compassion for life
to help those who love rise above strife.

The time for mercy is a frame for grace.
It is appointed for the right length and place. 

The rubble from destruction
is a plea for reformed construction.

Your name will be revered by the nations.
Your glory will be seen by the respective stations
in various locations.

Zion will be rebuilt in Israel
that glory may be fulfilled as visible. 

Prayers will be answered for those who seek the divine will.
The request will not be despised for those who ask to pay the benign bill.

Let this be read by a future generation
that the unborn may praise the Spirit's sensation
with elation.

Heavenly light looked down from the holy height
to behold the earth in recovery from disaster's destructive appetite.

Freedom declares the choice of goodness
to avoid damage in the pursuit of fullness.

The groan of the falsely convicted has been heard
to obtain release from captivity interred as unearned.

The enlightenment used anti-monotheistic sentiment
to promote revolution based on anti-religious resentment.

Socialism was developed as a result
to apologize for the resultant tumult.

The spirit of rebellion against authority
is not a benefit to the majority.

Recognition of the right for Israel to exist
is praise for God in Jerusalem wished.

People gather together in worshipful service
to celebrate providence in the observably earnest.

My strength had been brought down before my prime.
The number of days had been shortened in time.

I said, "Do not take me from the midst of my prayer.
Your time endures for the salvation of care.

"The foundation of the earth was for heaven laid
in the beginning for this life that the Creator made.

"Special atonement did not build a foundation for love. 
The universal kind offered the promise for redemption by grace from above.

"Perfection is not a thing to be claimed throughout temporal reality.
It is a goal to which to aspire in what can be seen in the afternoon tea.

"Creation will perish, but the Father will endure
to provide what can be provided in the covenant that is sure.

"Change in the observable will by the Spirit become manifest
within the variables in the substance constantly blessed as best.

"Christ will change reality like a garment.
The world will be rearranged for benefit from the bargain.

"The Creator remains outside of that which is changed.
Time won't end in the foreign exchange. 

"The children of the divine heritage will continue.
Their offspring will stand fast with the faith of God in you."

------------------------

102 Domine, exaudi
Dominated, answer

1 Lord, hear my prayer, and let my cry come before you;
hide not your face from me in the day of my trouble.
2 Incline your ear to me;
when I call, make haste to answer me,
3 For my days drift away like smoke,
and my bones are hot as burning coals.
4 My heart is smitten like grass and withered,
so that I forget to eat my bread.
5 Because of the voice of my groaning
I am but skin and bones.
6 I have become like a vulture in the wilderness,
like an owl among the ruins.
7 I lie awake and groan;
I am like a sparrow, lonely on a house-top.
8 My enemies revile me all day long,
and those who scoff at me have taken an oath against me.
9 For I have eaten ashes for bread
and mingled my drink with weeping.
10 Because of your indignation and wrath
you have lifted me up and thrown me away.
11 My days pass away like a shadow,
and I wither like the grass.
12 But you, O Lord, endure for ever,
and your Name from age to age.
13 You will arise and have compassion on Zion,
for it is time to have mercy upon her;
indeed, the appointed time has come.
14 For your servants love her very rubble,
and are moved to pity even for her dust.
15 The nations shall fear your Name, O Lord,
and all the kings of the earth your glory.
16 For the Lord will build up Zion,
and his glory will appear.
17 He will look with favor on the prayer of the homeless;
he will not despise their plea.
18 Let this be written for a future generation,
so that a people yet unborn may praise the Lord.
19 For the Lord looked down from his holy place on high;
from the heavens he beheld the earth;
20 That he might hear the groan of the captive
and set free those condemned to die;
21 That they may declare in Zion the Name of the Lord,
and his praise in Jerusalem;
22 When the peoples are gathered together,
and the kingdoms also, to serve the Lord.
23 He has brought down my strength before my time;
he has shortened the number of my days;
24 And I said, "O my God,
do not take me away in the midst of my days;
your years endure throughout all generations.
25 In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands;
26 They shall perish, but you will endure;
they all shall wear out like a garment;
as clothing you will change them,
and they shall be changed;
27 But you are always the same,
and your years will never end.
28 The children of your servants shall continue,
and their offspring shall stand fast in your sight."

-------------------------
==================
-------------------------

Eng. Will you please help me?

Chn. 你能帮我吗?
           Nǐ néng bāng wǒ ma?

Jpn.  助けてくれませんか?
           Tasukete kuremasen ka?

Krn.   도와주세요?
            dowajuseyo?

Ltn.     Placet et mihi?
Itln.     Mi aiuti per favore?
Spn.    Por favor podría usted ayudarme?
Frn.     Pouvez-vous m'aider s'il-vous-plaît?
Gmn.  Würdest du mir bitte helfen?
Hgn.    Kérem, segítsen nekem?

Grk.     Θα με βοηθήσετε;
             Tha me voithísete?

Rsn.    Не могли бы вы помочь мне?
             Ne mogli by vy pomoch' mne?

Trk.     Lütfen bana yardım eder misin?

-----------------------------

Psalm 102
 

The Book of Psalms is divided into 5 sections. Psalm 102 belongs to the 4th (Psalms 90-106).

Each song is identified by a sequence number. The numbering of the Septuagint differs from that of the Masoretic text. Protestants use the Masoretic sequence. The Septuagint and Vulgate unite psalms 9 and 10. It alters the numbers by one.

The kinds of psalms differ. There are hymns, communal laments, royal songs, individual laments and individual thanksgivings. Psalm 102 is an individual lament.

It opens with an invocation, followed by the lament and ends with an expression of confidence.
The description, "My days pass away like a shadow and I wither like the grass" (v.11) indicates the feeling of greater age as associated with the approach of winter.

The admission of temporal existence is contrasted with eternal time when the lament shifts toward thanksgiving. "You are forever. Your name lasts from age to age." (v.12)

Some of the psalms are attributed to David as a prayer in his name. (Ps.17 and 86) The psalmist identifies as "the afflicted" in the introduction of this kind. It is one of the 7 penitential psalms.

Those that refer to the psalmist by name express confidence in the descendants of David. Those that lament the afflicted condition are expressions of concern about the righteousness of the other descendants.

The songs celebrated the line of succession for the preservation of what was right about the leadership, but the laments of affliction encouraged repentance for redemption from error in the same line.

The psalmist has said in essence, "I believe that my faith will lead me in what is right, but I fear that I will be misled by error or will mislead. May God help me to believe in that which is best."

--------------------------

The Vision


The 6th chapter of the book records the vision of Isaiah in the year that Uzziah, the father of Jotham and king of Judah died.

The vision of divine glory stamped an indelible character on Isaiah’s ministry. It provided a key to understanding  his message. The majesty, holiness and glory of the promise of the inheritance took possession of his spirit.

He gained an awareness of human pettiness and sinfulness in the face of heavenly glory. The abyss between the sovereign holiness of the divine nature in relation to human sinfulness overwhelmed the prophet. He was left with gratitude for the grace of forgiveness for the fulfillment of the promise.

The reign of Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah lasted from about 750 to about 685 BCE.
Jotham was 25 years old when he began his rule and reigned for 16 years (2 Chr.27:1; 2 Kgs.15:33).

He inherited a strong government. It was organized with officers for administration. He was a contemporary with the prophets Isaiah, Hosea, Amos and Micah.

He is credited with having built the Upper Gate of the Temple of Jerusalem. (2 Chr.27:3)
2 Kings 15:37 mentions that Jotham fought wars against Rezin, king of the Arameans, and Pekah, king of Israel.

Ahaz was the son and successor of Jotham. He was 20 when he became king of Judah and reigned for 16 years.

Ahaz is portrayed as an evil king in the Second Book of Kings (2 Kings 16:2).

Ashur-nirari V led the Assyrians against the city of Arpad in northern Aram in 754 BCE. His successor Tiglath-Pileser III warred against Arpad in the years 743 to 740. The city was captured after three years.

Rezin of Damascus made an alliance with Pekah of Israel in the face of this threat. The two were therefore enemies of the pro-Assyrian king of Judah, Ahaz (Isa. 7:1).

Menahem, ruling in Samaria, sent tribute to Tiglath-Pileser (Biblical Pul) in order to "strengthen his hold on the kingdom," (2 Kgs 15:19), apparently against his anti-Assyrian rival Pekah.

Pekah had set up in a rival reign in Gilead to Menahem's Samaria-based kingdom in Nisan of 752. He became the sole ruler on the assassination of Menahem's son Pekahiah in 740/739. He died in 732/731.

Hezekiah was the son of Ahaz and the 13th king of Judah. He witnessed the destruction of the northern Kingdom of Israel by Sargon's Assyrians in c. 722 and was king of Judah during the siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib in 701.

He is considered a righteous king by the author of the Books of Kings (2 Kgs. 18:3).

Isaiah wrote during the period that marked the expansion of the Assyrian empire and the decline of Israel. The Assyrians swept westward into Aram (Syria) and Canaan under King Tiglath-Pileser III (745-727).

The kings of Aram and Israel tried to pressure Ahaz king of Judah into joining a coalition against Assyria around 733.  Ahaz chose to ask Tiglath-Pileser for help instead. The decision was condemned by Isaiah.

Isaiah's wife was called "the prophetess" (Isa. 8:3). They had 3 sons. Each name represented the aspect of a prophesy. The eldest was named Shear-jashub. The name meant "A remnant shall return" (Isa. 7:3).

It was predicted that the assault on Jerusalem by Pekah and Rezin would fail.

The next son was named Immanuel. It meant "God with us" (Isa. 7:14). A siege on Jerusalem by Assyria would be complicated by the 'defense' by Egypt. Both armies would assemble outside of Jerusalem.

The resultant battle would destroy the vines of the vineyards and the domestic cattle that produced milk for curds. It was predicted that the city would be preserved at a cost.

The youngest was named, Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. It meant, "Spoil quickly, plunder speedily" (Isa. 8:3). The name predicted that the riches of Damascus and the spoils of Syria would be carried away by Assyria.

The fall of the northern kingdom was indicated by the names of the 3 sons. Only a remnant would escape the subsequent dispersion by the Assyrians. No kings would presume to claim the rule of the kingdom. No records were kept to document the state of the kingdom.

Assyria assisted Ahaz with the conquest of the northern kingdom in 722-721. This made Judah vulnerable to attack.

King Sennacherib of Assyria would invade the land to threaten the city of Jerusalem in 701 (Isa. 36:1). He would attack and capture the fortified cities of Judah before camping outside of the capital.

The perpetual ingratitude of a child toward his parent was regarded as the cause of revolt (Isa.1:1).
Israel and Judah are indicted for sin in chapters 1-5 of the Book of Isaiah. Revolt was indicated as a sickness of the head that made the hear faint.

The sickness was 'diagnosed' as probable to increase (Isa.1:5). A remant had been preserved to prevent the destruction that had visited Sodom and Gomorrah. (Isa.1:9).

The battles of the northern kingdom were seen as a portent for Judah. The blood of sacrificed animals could not appease the offense caused by ingratitude or pride. (Isa.1:11).

The practice of sacrifice established for appeasement in the past was a perpetuation of the immorality of the gods for whom the animals were sacrificed.

It was the will to love God and to serve others in the kingdom that served as the sacrifice for the law. Rebellion against the law would result in loss of the promise.

The city of peace was built on the elevated area so the people could go up to visit to ask to see judgment from the Judge of the nations.  The temple was the house for to watch for instruction in the competition to learn the way to walk on the path for the law. (Isa.2:3)

Insofar as the past was a vehicle for war as the means to battle for authority to establish the royal line for succession weapons would be subordinated to trade in order to keep military action limited to defense (Isa.2:4).

The nations then had soothsayers and fortune-tellers. The children of the Father ought not so to have degraded themselves, but they did.  They made concession to foreign practice or custom to show allegiance when they sought out foreigner alliance when they should have maintained alliance to the Author of the promise.

They entered into league with idols and false stories about gods to preserve belief in the corruption of human nature when they should have preserved respect for the law to provide sympathy and provision only as needed to care for those who needed assistance due to the adversity of circumstance.

Insofar as adversity was the cause of strife; strife was the cause of anger in disagreement; angry disagreement was the cause of conflict with respect for violent action to avenge perceived wrongs and violent action was the cause for cruel punishment, it was advised that some surplus in supply could be used to redress consequence from adversity.

The leadership of royalty was to serve as a model for conservative reform in the preservation of providence. This model was to serve elected office for the republican leadership of people in self-government with constitutional law.

Strife among the poor was the most likely area for conflict based on lack of  providence. Judgment for the resolution of conflict has to consider the rights of those who are willing to work as part of the team for the health of household productivity in the community is that which is expressed in the equit for the meek of the earth.

Those who avoid economic productivity by persistence in pressing accusation against others for personal gain from the neglect or abuse of authority in order to make it look like allegation is the responsibility for the community, need to correct their error or they will stand in need of correction. 

Isa. 11:4

With righteousness he shall judge the poor,
and decide with equity for the meek of the earth;
he shall strike the earth with the rod of his mouth,
and with the breath of his lips he shall kill the wicked.

-------------------------

The equity of righteousness will judge the poor.
Teamwork for civil rights will not be coerced as the door
to the place beyond what surplus can endure.

Those who subject the law to unreal idealist oppression
will be corrected by self-recognition or external correction.

Those who subject the law to rule by violence or the threat
will incur liability that will help them to self-correct or suffer debt.

Those who work for civil or human rights with respect
will receive recognition that will network to achieve earned consent.

==================

Freedom

Paul greeted several people in Romans 16. The most notable of these were Priscilla and Aquila. Both Aquila and Priscilla were in Rome until about 49 when Claudius expelled the Jews from the city (Acts 18:2).

Paul met the couple when he visited Corinth (c. 51). They did further ministry in Ephesus (Acts 18:19) around c. 53. They went to Rome from there. It is likely that they were not the first ones to take the gospel to Rome. The apostle greeted the church community that met in the their house (16:5).

The city was predominately populated by Gentiles. The church was comprised of both Jewish and Gentile believers (cf. 1:6, 7:1). Paul addresses both groups in this epistle. There was agreement about the importance of the law for civil society between Jews and Gentiles in the Christian community.

The message in Isaiah was rewritten for the audience. The Romans, Greeks and Jews in Rome had been informed about the role for religion in the empire. The sacrifice wasn't as important as the love for those for whom the sacrifice was offered. Finding the law of love inscribed in our hearts is the most important product of the action.

It was known that the Romans held republic as their form of government. The Greeks had preceded them with Athenian, Spartan and Macedonian monarchy. The Athenians had entertained democratic monarchy.

Plato had recorded the Phaedrus as a debate about love. Socrates argued for passionate love, but it was between men. Men associated with men as a popular form of political consensus. The influence on the democratic monarchy was populist as a result.

Plato would direct the criticism against democracy after the Spartans had gained the ascendance in Greek culture between the competing city states.

The author of the epistle argued that men chose to be with men because the women had chosen to be with women. (1:27) The passion resulted in a kind of agreement between the Athenians and Spartans that favored war against the Persian threat.  As long as the threat came from outside the realm, the enemy could be blamed for the fear of insecurity.

The Jews were cautioned even more than the Romans that while instruction in the law inspired appreciation for excellence (2:18) righteousness by faith as seen in Abraham (4:2) was the fundamental organizational principle for the community.

The law was to be found in the heart, not in the rite of circumcision. Polytheists, monotheists, Gentiles and Jews were all under the power of sin (3:9). Judgment had to be about deterring harmfulness from the behavior not about who was making the judgment. (2:3)

It was another reminder to form judgment against the sin as opposed to condemning the person whom had accused of  the 'sin.' The aversion of damage and the conversion of the sinner was the intent, not the destruction of the accused.

The state of nature came prior to the law. (2:12) It preceded the development of polytheism or monotheism. There was only the battle against the elements with or without the tribal society.

Primitive tribalism fashioned totems and smaller idols. Kingdoms had a god or a parthenon of gods and goddesses. Republic was fancied as an advanced regression insofar as 'no single' person would profit from the benefit of society in the state. They aspired to civilization, but they worshiped the creature rather than the Creator (1:25).

The promise of inheritance from Abraham to his descendants came by faith in the one God. It was the righteousness of faith that made him the father of many nations. We share in the faith in the One who who gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist. (4:17)

Idolatry fashioned images. The stories of polytheism entertained rebellion against God. The spirit of rebellion was for lawlessness. The law and the prophets point to righteousness in relations, but faith is more important than works of the law (3:27).

Baptism cleanses the initiate from the sinfulness to the world as the works of darkness are washed from the portals of perception to reveal the light from the love of God the Father in his Son, Jesus Christ. Christ was sacrificed for the ungodly (5:6).

This was the free gift of the atonement as offered for the redemption of the fall from grace by Adam. The Son was offered as a sacrifice once for all. We were baptized into his death to die to rise into the newness of life (6:4).

We are no longer slaves to sin (6:20). We have been made free to walk in faith with righteousness.
The law is binding until death. When a married woman is bound to her husband by law it is for the length of his life. If her husband dies she is released from the obligation of marriage to her husband. (7:2)

Sinful passions rebelled against the law when we were living in the flesh. (7:5) We have been delivered from slavery to sin by our birth through baptism in Christ.

Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel (9:6). Isaiah wrote about a remnant. Free will is important in the discernment of righteousness in the law. There is a struggle to make the best choice in order to live by the direction of the conscience. Even with prayer we are left to test the water for what is best.

The author of the letter wrote as though Israel were lost to faith in salvation by works of the law. (9:32) We are not saved by our works, but by the grace that is shown to us despite the lack of brilliance in glory. How are we to ask for guidance from One in whom we have not believed? (10:14)

The Jews have not been rejected (11:1). Salvation has been offered to the Gentiles to give an incentive to adapt the continuum of faith for the extension of the gift to others. Experience is the guide until inspiration or invention reveals something better.

We are exhorted to present our bodies as a living sacrifice in worship. Hate evil. Hold fast to what is good. Love with affection. Outdo each other in showing honor. Rejoice in hope, Be patient in tribulation.

Be constant in prayer. Contribute to the needs of the present or the future community. Practice hospitality. Observe respect for authority. Pay your taxes. Owe no one anything, except for allegiance to love. (13:8)

The night is gone. The day is at hand. Cast off the works of darkness. (13:12)

May your steadfast hope encourage you to live in harmony with one another in Christ Jesus to glorify the Father with one voice. (15:5)

Rom. 15:4

Whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that by steadfastness and by the encouragement of the scriptures we might have hope.

-------------------------

That which was written in scripture was for our instruction
that by steadfast encouragement we might have hope to help us function.

==================

Lamb of God

The gospel of Matthew was written for a Jewish community.

The first chapter contains two distinct sections. The first lists the genealogy of Jesus from Abraham to his legal father Joseph, his mother's husband. The second part starts at verse 18. It provides an account of the virgin birth of Jesus Christ.

The second chapter describes the events after the birth of Jesus, the visit of the magi and the attempt by King Herod to kill the infant messiah, Joseph and his family's flight into Egypt and their later return to live in Nazareth in Israel.

The third chapter is the first to deal with the ministry of Jesus with events taking place some three decades after the close of the infancy narrative related in the previous two chapters. The focus of this chapter is on the preaching of John the Baptist and the Baptism of Jesus.

There are clear links with the Gospel of Mark for the first time since Matthew 1:1. Many scholars are certain a good portion of this chapter is a reworking of Mark 1. The chapter also parallels Luke 3.

A number of passages shared by Luke and Matthew, but not found in Mark, are commonly ascribed to the hypothetical source 'Q'.

The baptism of Jesus is described in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. John's gospel does not directly describe the baptism.

The baptism is one of the major theological events in the gospel narrative of the life of Jesus. Others include the Transfiguration, Crucifixion, Resurrection and Ascension.

Matt. 3:11

'I baptize you with water for repentance, but one who is more powerful than I is coming after me; I am not worthy to carry his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.'
-------------------------

Baptism uses water to wash away sins for repentance.
The Holy Spirit baptizes with fire for entrance
to the new life in relation to the divine essence.

==================

Heart

Richard Baxter
b. 11.12.1615 Rowton, England
d. 12.8.1691 London, Great Britain

Richard Baxter never received a higher commission than that of parish pastor to loom workers in Kidderminster. This did not stop him from becoming one of the most prominent English churchman of the 1600's with his written work.

He was a peacemaker who sought unity among Protestants as a highly independent thinker. He found his way to the center of every major controversy in England during his lifetime.

He was ordained into the Church of England, but he was not quite a Separatist and not quite a Conformist in his theology. He eventually registered as a non-conformist, but he expressed his opposition to the rebellion.

He wrote extensively after he was elected as the pastor for Kidderminster. He was as an emphatically theological writer for self-instruction with bible study and prayer. The instruction was for piety in personal behavior and social relations.

He retained a non-separatist Presbyterian approach and became one of the most influential leaders of the Nonconformists after the Restoration.

His views on justification are unconventional within the Calvinist tradition because his teachings emphasize the importance of repentance and faithfulness for credibility in the claim to salvation by faith.

Rowton is located near the border with Wales.
Map England 16th and 17th Centuries

Rowton is a small village located 7 miles north of the Market Town of Wellington, Shropshire. The village church of All Hallows is a medieval foundation which was reconstructed in 1881. It is recorded that Rowton had a Priest as early as 1086.

Shropshire is a county that sits on the western border of Wales. It is England's largest inland county. The River Severn, Great Britain's longest river, runs through the county. It exits into Worcestershire via the Severn Valley.

Major estates in Shropshire were granted to Normans after the conquest in 1066. Defensive castles were built at this time across the county to defend against the Welsh and enable effective control of the region. Ludlow Castle was among these.

The border with Wales was defined in the 16th century to confirm the Lordships formed prior to the Laws in Wales Act. This act of the English Parliament incorporated Wales as part of the Kingdom of England. 

Life

Richard Baxter was born at Rowton, Shropshire, at the house of his maternal grandfather on 12 November 1615, He was baptised at its then parish church at High Ercall. The village is included in the civil parish.

He had been educated by the local clergy who acted as tutors in Latin. He was then sent to the court of Ludlow Castle, the effective capital for Wales, for more tutelage in education.

He was persuaded to join the court in London for more education, but returned home before long. He spent time reading theology with a local clergyman.

He read the devotional writings of Anglican theologians with Calvinist views before moving on to the works of the orthodox Anglican theologian Richard Hooker and some Puritans who conformed to Anglican guidelines for authority.

He met 2 non-conformists in about 1634.

He became master of the free grammar school at Dudley in 1638. He was ordained and licensed by the Bishop of Worcester. He commenced as a minister there.

His success as a preacher was small at first. He was soon transferred to Bridgnorth, in Shropshire, as assistant to a Mr Madstard. He established a reputation for vigorously discharging the duties of his office.

Baxter remained at Bridgnorth for nearly two years.  He took a special interest in the controversy relating to Nonconformity and the Church of England during this time.

He became alienated from the Church on a number of matters. He rejected episcopacy in its English form after the requirement of the "et cetera oath."

The Convocation of the English Clergy traditionally met whenever Parliament met and was dissolved whenever Parliament was dissolved. Charles ordered Convocation to continue sitting even after he dissolved the Short Parliament in 1640.

The Convocation had not yet passed the canons which Charles had had Archbishop Laud draw up. The Laudian church policies were confirmed as the official policies of the Church of England. Convocation dutifully passed these canons in late May 1640.

The first canon asserted that the king ruled by divine right. The doctrine of Royal Supremacy was required by law. Taxes were due by the law of God, nature and nations.

This canon led many Ministers of Parliament to conclude that Charles and the Laudian clergy were attempting to use the Church of England as a way to establish an absolute monarchy.

Canons against popery and non-Trinitarian Christology were not controversial. The canon that condemned anyone who did not regularly attend service in their parish church or who attended only the sermon, not the full Prayer Book service, were regarded as controversial. Puritans believed that these rules were directed against them.

A declaration known to Puritans as the the Et Cetera Oath was to be administered to clergyman, clerics and candidates for ordination.

The oath declared approval for the doctrine, discipline or government in the Church of England as that which contained that which was necessary for salvation.

It qualified agreement with the episcopacy for the administration of the rite of marriage and the sacraments of Baptism and the Eucharist. The Church of England insisted on independence from the "usurpations and superstitions" of the see of Rome.

The key point was that the monarchy and the episcopacy of England were dedicated to the security of the realm.

The Puritans stated that the Canons of 1640 were unconstitutional. He claimed that Convocation was no longer legally in session after Parliament was dissolved.

The administration of the Et Cetera Oath also resulted in the Puritans' pro-Scottish sympathies becoming even more widespread.

Baxter became a moderate Nonconformist. He continued as such throughout his life. He was not exclusively tied to Presbyterianism even though he was regarded as a Presbyterianan. He often seemed prepared to accept a modified Episcopalianism. He regarded all forms of church government as subservient to the true purposes of religion.

The Calvinist position was irresolutely determined to define the monarchy as laying claim to absolute authority, so they opposed any measures perceived as such as corrupt. They formed a strange loop in their logic that prevented negotiation.

One of the first measures of the Long Parliament which lasted from 1640 to 1660 was to reform the clergy. A committee was appointed to receive complaints against them. The inhabitants of Kidderminster were among the complainants.

The vicar George Dance agreed that he would give £60 a year, out of his income of £200, to a preacher who should be chosen by certain trustees.

Baxter was invited to deliver a sermon before the people and was unanimously elected as the minister of St Mary and All Saints' Church in Kidderminster. This happened in April 1641, when he was 26 years old.

Kidderminster

Kidderminster is a town in Worcestershire, England. It is 17 miles (27 km) south-west of Birmingham and 15 miles (24 km) north of Worcester.

King Charles I had granted the Borough of Kidderminster a Charter in 1636.

The Reformed Pastor
Text

Baxter's ministry continued for about 19 years with many interruptions. He accomplished many reforms in Kidderminster and the neighborhood during that time.

He formed the ministers in the country around him into an association that united them irrespective of their differences as Presbyterians, Episcopalians and Independents.

The Reformed Pastor (1657) was a book which Baxter published in relation to the general ministerial efforts he promoted.

Baxter shared his experience to encourage other pastors in their vocation. The pastor's work was to glorify God and share the truth of the faith. Pastors are called to obey the commandments to seek knowledge so that they may grow in love as a model for piety.

English Civil War

England was united as kingdom during the rule of the House of Tudor. Ancestral Wales and the Lordship of Ireland were included in the union. There were 5 monarchs in the succession which ran from 1485 to 1603.

When Elizabeth I passed away without a successor the royal line was shifted to the House of Stuart from Scotland. While the same king ruled Scotland and England, there were different parliaments for each. The goal was to form a single parliament for Scotland and England as Great Britain.

The goal was opposed by Calvinists. The Puritans in England and the Presbyterians in Scotland accused the king of seeking an absolute monarchy. The union had been described as Protestant by the Etc. Oath. The oath included a pledge to accept the episcopacy in Church leadership.

The monarchy and the episcopacy were accused of corruption to refuse cooperation. James and Charles most likely suspended parliament in England in order to organize a single parliament for Great Britain. This was taken as evidence of the effort to claim absolute power.

The Protestation of 1641 was an effort to avert English Civil War by the claim of Protestant unity. Those over the age of 18 were offered the opportunity to sign the oath of allegiance to King Charles I and the Church of England as a way to reduce the tensions across the realm. Those that did not sign it were also listed under it as refusing to pledge the oath.

The oath broadened participation in government to the public. The privilege of authority also carred the responsibility of service to the crown for the protection of the realm. The English Reformation offered men in the public over the age of 18, the opportunity to assume a responsible position of authority in government.

Tensions continued to escalate between Parliament and King Charles I. Civil War broke out in August 1642. Baxter had recommended the Protestation. Worcestershire was a Royalist stronghold.

The English Civil War was a battle between royal and parliamentarian armies. The king directed a march to London in October 1642. London was held by parliament's main army as commanded by the Earl of Essex.

The royal force ran into resistance in Edgehill, 135 kilometeres (84 miles) northeast of the capital. Baxter was preaching in Alcester on 23 October, 32 km (20 mi.) east of the battle.

The battle was inconclusive but it was one of the first in the 4 year conflict of the first civil war. The king resumed his march on London, but the defending militia averted the march with reinforcements from the army of Essex.

Worcestershire was only 9 miles from Worcestershire. Essex marched his army from Northampton to Worcester after the king had marched his from Nottingham to Shewsbury.

Baxter moved to a parliamentarian stronghold in Coventry to promote the growth of sectaries after Worcester had been taken. Sectaries were nonconformist preachers. He found himself in company with no fewer than 30 fugitive ministers.

He officiated each Sunday as chaplain to the garrison. He preached a sermon each to the soldiery and the townspeople. He took his chaplaincy to Colonel Edward Whalley's regiment after the Battle of Naseby on 14 June 1645.

Naseby was 137 km (85 mi.) northeast of London and 92 km (57 mi.) north of Oxford, the royalist capital. The parliamentarian army had effectively destroyed the royalist force. Charles lost the bulk of his veteran infantry and officers, all of his artillery and stores, his personal baggage and many arms.

Parliament had won the first civil war within a year after the battle. King Charles I was executed on Tuesday 30 January 1649. He was beheaded by the judgment of parliament for crimes against the "people."

Baxter's connection with the Parliamentary army was characteristic of his reform. He supported sectaries and constitutional government over the republican form that the more radical leadership of parliament demanded.

He was summoned to London by Cromwell to assist in settling "the fundamentals of religion" during the Protectorate.

He regretted that he had not previously accepted the offer to become chaplain to Cromwell's Ironsides army unit, but he chose to preach about the divisions in the church when summoned to preach before him. He argued with him about liberty of conscience and even defended the monarchy in subsequent interviews.

Baxter stayed at the home of Lady Rouse, wife of the baronet, in Worstershire in 1647. He wrote most of a major work, The Saints' Everlasting Rest (1650) while there. He also promoted the establishment of a new University of Shrewsbury. Lack of funding prevented success.

He returned to Kidderminster where he became a prominent political leader. An all-day debate was held on 1 January 1650 with John Tombes at Bewdley to address leading issues between the contending parties in state and church. It was attended by about 1500 people on each side.

The Protectorate was the period during the Commonwealth when England and Wales, Ireland, Scotland and the English overseas possessions were governed by a Lord Protector as a republic.

The Protectorate began in 1653 when Oliver Cromwell was appointed Lord Protector of the Commonwealth under the terms of the Instrument of Government after the Barebone's Parliament.
A slim devotional work  under the title Call to the Unconverted to Turn and Live was published by Baxter in 1658.

Charles II issued the Declaration of Breda in which he made several promises in relation to the reclamation of the crown of England on 4 April 1660. The Convention Parliament proclaimed that King Charles II had been the lawful monarch since the execution of Charles I.

Baxter settled in London after the Restoration. When he was offered the episcopacy for the bishopric of Hereford in 1660, he declined it.

He preached in the capital until the Act of Uniformity 1662 took effect. The Act prescribed the form of public prayers, administration of sacraments and other rites of the Established Church of England according to the rites and ceremonies prescribed in the Book of Common Prayer.

Adherence to this was required in order to hold any office in the church as sanctioned by the government. It explicitly required episcopal ordination for all ministers, i.e. deacons, priests and bishops.

The Puritans had abolished many features of the Church during the Interegnum.

Baxter was barred from ecclesiastical office by the Act. He was not permitted to return to Kidderminster, nor was he allowed to preach.

He was prosecuted for preaching between 1662 and 1668. He was imprisoned for 18 months and was forced to sell two libraries.

It was during this period that he said, "I preached as never sure to preach again and as a dying man to dying men."

His writing was not outlawed. Baxter's health had grown worse, yet this was the period of his greatest activity as a writer. He wrote 168 or so separate works. These included major treatises such as the Christian Directory, the Methodus Theologiae Christianae and the Catholic Theology.

His Breviate of the Life of Mrs Margaret Baxter records the virtues of his wife and tenderness which otherwise might not have been known.

His theology caused a rift among the Dissenters. He differed from standard Calvinist doctrine on a number of important points. The atonement is not limited to a select few, but is available to all who will believe in Christ.

The righteousness that is imputed to the believer in the work of justification is not the righteousness of Christ, but is by virtue of the faith of the believer in Christ. Every sinner has a distinct agency of his own to exert in the process of his conversion to belief in Christ.

When he was released from prison he lived the remainder of his life peacefully from 1687 onwards. He died in London on 8 December 1691 (aged 76). His funeral was attended by churchmen as well as dissenters.

He was sincere in his conviction, but misguided by his independence. He was constant in the choice to argue in opposition to the ascendant leadership despite the benefit of national unity for security.
His position on the atonement as open to all who would accept Christ however was rightly defined for universal salvation.

Richard Baxter
S. 理查德·巴克斯特
T. 理查德·巴克斯特

理 Le     reason              理   ri         logic                       Ri    り         リ             Li   리   lee         
查 cha   to examine       查   no kanji                             cha  ちゃ-  チャ-          cha  차  car             
德  de    favor                德  toku      ethics                     do    ど         ド             deu  드  de               
巴  Ba    to hope            巴  ha         comma-design       Ba    ば       バ               Bag  박  foil       
克  ke    to restrain        克   koku    overcome               ku    く        ク              seu   스  s           
斯  si      this                  斯  shi        this                         su    す        ス               teo  터   foundation 
特  te     unique              特  toku     special                     ta     た-     タ-                           

-----------------------

The special atonement did not build a foundation for love.
The universal kind offered the promise for redemption by grace from above.

Perfection is not a thing to be claimed throughout temporal reality.
It is a goal to which to aspire in what can be seen in the afternoon tea.

=================

Religion

Baron d'Holbach
b. 12.8.1723  Edesheim, France
d. 1.21.1789  Paris, France

Paul-Henri Thiry or Baron d'Holbach was an encyclopedist and German philosopher in the French Enlightenment.

He was given the name Paul Heinrich Dietrich at his birth in Germany, but spent most of his life in Paris. He was well known for his atheism and his salon. His most famous work against nature was known as The System of Nature (1770).

His naturalism was based on a deterministic and materialistic metaphysic. He used the metaphysics for his polemics against organized religion. His ethical and political theory was utilitarian.

The close circle of intellectuals that d'Holbach hosted and sponsored produced the Encyclopedia. The Encyclopedia incorporated a number of revisionary religious, ethical and political works into an ideological frame that contributed to the French Revolution.

D'Holbach's visiting guest list included many of the most prominent intellectual and political figures in Europe. His salon was a shelter for radical thought and a hub for mainstream culture.

Edesheim, Germany

Edesheim is a village near the town of Landau in the Rhineland-Palatinate in Germany. It is located near the border with France. Landau is a long-standing cultural center. It is a market and shopping town surrounded by vineyards and wine-growing villages of the Palatinate wine region.

The area was part of France from 1680 to 1815. It was one of the Décapole, the ten free cities of Alsace. It received fortifications by Louis XIV's military architect Vauban in 1688–99. The town only had a population of about 5,000 in 1789, but it was one of Europe's strongest citadels.

Life
Causality

Paul-Henri Thiry Dietrich was baptized on 8 December 1723. His mother was Catherine Jacobina née Holbach (1684–1743). She was the daughter of Johannes Jacobus Holbach (died 1723). He was the Prince-Bishop's tax collector for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Speyer.

Paul's father was Johann Jakob Dietrich. He was a wine-grower.

Paul was raised in Paris by his uncle Franz Adam Holbach. His uncle had become a millionaire by speculating on the Paris stock-exchange.

Paul attended the Leiden University from 1744 to 1748 with his uncle's support. The university was founded in Leiden, Netherlands in 1575 by William, Prince of Orange, as a reward to the town for its defense against Spanish attacks. It is the oldest university in the Netherlands. It is known for an emphasis on social sciences.

He married his second cousin, Basile-Geneviève d'Aine (1728–1754), on 11 December 1750. They had a son whom they named Francois Nicholas.

Both his uncle and his father died in 1753. He was left with a large inheritance. He would remain wealthy throughout his life.

His wife died from an unknown disease in 1754. He moved to the provinces for a brief period with his friend Baron Grimm. He received a special dispensation from the Pope to marry his deceased wife's sister, Charlotte-Suzanne d'Aine (1733–1814) the following year.

They had a son, Charles-Marius (1757–1832) and two daughters Amélie-Suzanne (13 January 1759) and Louise-Pauline (19 December 1759 – 1830).

Holbach used his great wealth to throw the dinner parties for which he is famous. He owned a house in Paris in rue Royale, Butte Saint-Roch, which, generally, had a guest list restricted to serious intellectuals.

He retreated to his country estate at Grandval, Le Château de Grand-Val during the summer months when Paris was hot and humid. He invited friends to stay for a few days or weeks.

He invited Denis Diderot every year. Diderot was a writer who became best known for serving as co-founder, chief editor and contributor to the Encyclopédie along with Jean le Rond d'Alembert.

It was the first encyclopedia to include contributions from many named contributors. It was also the first to describe the mechanical arts. It included articles skeptical about Biblical miracles. This angered both religious and government authorities.

The biblical stories described events that displayed benefit from faith in the love of God that presented an alternative to ordinary polytheistic conventions that cultivated the expectation that intervention by supernatural beings would be coercive.

The beneficial outcome from faith in the love of God was promoted by the stories about the miracles. The miracles were a popular form of argument against classical determinism.

D'Holbach was known for his generosity. He often provided financial support discreetly or anonymously to his friends. Diderot was among them. It is thought that the virtuous atheist Wolmar in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Julie, ou la nouvelle Héloïse is based on d'Holbach.

His close social circle shared at least a willingness to entertain views that many would have thought too radical to be discussed in other social settings. The coterie met from the 1750's into the 1780's.

The group evolved over time, but its core members included Denis Diderot, Jean d'Alembert; Friedrich-Melchior Grimm and the naturalist Charles-Georges Le Roy.

D'Holbach was a contemporary of British Empiricists like David Hume and Adam Smith. Enlightenment thought was greatly influenced by the new mechanical and deterministic science of Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.

He was more determined by his determinism than his fellow French philosophes Condillac, Condorcet, Diderot, d'Alembert, Helvetius, Rousseau and Voltaire. He embraced the hard determinism that is implicit in a world of matter governed by perfectly strict and absolute Newtonian laws of motion.

He was an ontological materialist. He denied the existence of anything like an immaterial spirit. He was most notably against belief in anything supernatural. This opposition specifically excluded the idea of human free will.

He wasn't content with opposition to that which was wrong about the use of freedom. He opposed the existence of the concept altogether.

Determined by Causality 

He developed many of the arguments in use today by philosophers who call themselves naturalists. Where Hume was a "soft determinist" or "compatibilist," d'Holbach accepted most of the implications of his belief that natural causes are behind all human actions.

His home residence was his salon. A salon was a gathering of people under the roof of an inspiring host, held partly to amuse one another and partly to refine the taste and increase the knowledge of the participants through conversation. Meetings were held regularly twice a week, on Sundays and Thursdays, in d'Holbach's home.

He authored and translated a large number of articles on topics ranging from politics and religion to chemistry and mineralogy for the Encyclopedie. He may have written several disparaging entries on non-Christian religions, intended as veiled criticisms of Christianity itself.

His philosophical writings were published anonymously or under pseudonyms. They were printed outside France, usually in Amsterdam by Marc-Michel Rey. His philosophy was expressly materialistic and atheistic and is today categorized into the philosophical movement called French materialism.

The System of Nature (Le Système de la nature) was published in 1770 under the name of Jean-Baptiste de Mirabaud, the secretary of the Académie française. Mirabaud had died ten years earlier.

The work denied the existence of a deity. It refused to acknowledge a priori argument as evidence. The universe was defined as nothing more than matter in motion bound by the inexorably natural laws of cause and effect.

His objective  in challenging religion was posited as primarily moral. He saw the institution of Christianity as the major obstacle to the improvement of society.

The foundation of morality was to be sought not in Scripture but in happiness. His happiness however was hedonistic. He argued that vice should be loved as the source of pleasure.

He wrote, "It would be useless and almost unjust to insist upon a man's being virtuous if he cannot be so without being unhappy. So long as vice renders him happy, he should love vice."
(System of Nature)

He presented "enlightened self-interest" as the mediating factor in the pursuit of happiness. One could only entertain his own pleasure insofar as it sustained that of others.

There is an attempt to flip the utilitarian formulation for the greatest happiness of the greatest number into the self-promotion posited by the consensus of the claim to liberal power.

Liberals claimed the authority to punish those in the legal polity who were not in agreement with the self interest of the claim to liberal power over the society. It's the way that they turn the presumption of democracy for the republic or kingdom into the mandate of dictatorship.

The scientific materialism of d'Holbach was put together with the economic materialism of Marx and Engles in the economic theory of socialism. Socialists circumvent the action of organization to provide a service to the public with private property.

They skip to the idea that those who have organized a successful service need to be punished by unsubstantiated allegations through government control.

D'Holbach argued for laissez faire in agreement with the proposal of private property by Locke, but it the argument was made superficial by the claim to liberal power over society with the promotion of violent aggression and cruel punishment by deception.

A limited budget has to exercise selection in the choice of products in order to maintain a surplus of 'cash' in the bank. Liberals seeks to remove choice as an option. This is the greatest drawback of the determinist position.

Holbach died in Paris on 21 January 1789, a few months before the French Revolution.  The authorship of his various anti-religious works did not become widely known until the early 19th century.

The argument for free will within legal polity allows for the consideration of causality. The materialistism of naturalistic determinism does not allow for the thought of free will.

Paul Dietrich, Baron d'Holbach
S. 保罗·迪特里希
T.  保羅·迪特里希

保 Bao     to ensure                     保  ho       protect        Po  ぽ-       ポ-         Pol  폴  pole           
罗 luo      to catch                       羅  ra        gauze           ru   る        ル          Di    디   d           
迪 Di       to enlighten                 迪  teki    edify            Dei でぃ-   ディ-     teu  트   t             
特 te        special                         特  toku   special         to    と        ト           li      리   Lee           
里 li         internal                       里  ri         internal        ri    りっ    リッ       hi     히   he           
希 xi        hope                            希  ki        hope            hi     ひ         ヒ                                     

---------------------------

The enlightenment used anti-monotheistic sentiment
to promote revolution based on anti-religious resentment.

Socialism was developed as a result
to apologize for the resultant tumult.

====================

Heart
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ae/7a/23/ae7a2337cd5d1aea6c450aa35b0836a6.jpg

The central proposition of reformed epistemology is that beliefs can be justified by more than evidence alone. A primary argument against the existence of deity is that no one can see the divine nature.

Evidentialism argues that while belief other than through evidence may be beneficial, it violates some epistemic duty.

Central to reformed epistemology is the proposition that belief in God may be "properly basic" and not need to be inferred from other truths to be rationally warranted.

William Lane Craig described Reformed epistemology as "One of the most significant developments in contemporary Religious Epistemology." It denies the evidentialist take on rationality.

Alvin Plantinga distinguishes between what he calls de facto from de jure objections to Christian belief. A de facto objection is one that attempts to show that Christian truth claims are false.

De jure objections attempt to undermine Christian belief even if it is, in fact, true. Plantinga argues that there are no successful objections to Christian belief apart from those which are de facto (fact-based).

Reformed epistemology was named because it represents a continuation of the 16th-century reformed theology of John Calvin. He postulated a sensus divinitatis, an innate divine awareness of God's presence.

Calvin was trained as a lawyer. His church government was defined by local council. His defined human nature as totally depraved.

He emphasized providence to the Church as the answer to prayer. Bible study and instruction in the language were the key values in the advocacy for prayer.

Rebellion was not ruled out. No man was seen as sufficient to act as the sovereign due to corruption. Calvin's theology defaulted to the metaphysics and logic of Aristotle when it came to monarchy.

Republic with the regression to slavery and the slave trade was not explicitly endorsed until Locke implied that it was part of the liberal power of imperial civilization. This was a concession to the European competition with the Ottoman empire.

Since republic has been instituted major political changes with respect for constitutional law have been enacted. Slavery and the slave trade were outlawed. The right to vote for men of color and women was amended as explicit.

Calvin's influence on the political world was destructive with respect for leadership beyond the local level. The Reformed  epistemology has developed beyond the demotic design of local authority that entertains the spirit of rebellion against higher levels of political or social organization.

National level Calvinism had entertained higher levels of government as an instrument of punishment towards those who were not willing to attack with accusation those who were not operating in the sectarian mode of the secret surveillance state.

Local levels of perception have struggled with the story line of the imperial government since the prophesy of Ezekiel. The greatest happiness for the greatest number is a developmental form for the morality of legislated law that encourages the choice of goodness with free will in informed consent. 
Divine revelation has profound relevance in the context of this struggle.