Sunday, December 29, 2019

Find

1.5.20

Danica Mckellar

Find
Design
寻找设计
Xúnzhǎo shèjì
デザインを見つける
Dezain o mitsukeru
ps119.1+
Find consilio

Happy are those who walk in the law
with the benign design of the natural draw.  

Civility is accord with the rightness of truth for security.
Instruction in defense directs action for maturity.

The least force necessary to resolve a crisis
is economic and instructive for credible license.

Logic for the function of service to the public
is unction that serves work that is productive for uplift. 

Administration for economic benefit
is the purpose that organizes action in the genesis
of value that defeats the influence of the degenerate deficit.



How is this supposed to work?
If I shake it will it go berserk? 

Happy are those who walk in the way
that orders steps for goodness in the night or day.

The goal to do no wrong
is as strong as the length of long
that learns from error to sing our song.

Precepts are ordered to anticipate mastery in command
to win the struggle to overcome the dictum of detrimental demand.

The demand for radical change 
is the reason that this discourse seems strange.

That which is wanted in the weight of their speech
is supplied by the aptness of the undecided to believe.

The radicals want to change everything for them.
They would overthrow the state of the union for their dictum.

Opposition to the radical insists on regression
though the need for reform stands as a profession.

Moral polity is directed to conservative reform.
Even good change is inconvenient to the status formed.

I will order my ways to be steadfast
in keeping the statutes cast
from the experience of goodness in the past
for the benefit of the future asked.

My eyes are fixed on the commandments
for the enchantment of advancement.

I will praise you with an upright heart
when my precedents are ordered for the art
of the smart chart for profit from the mart.



I will observe the benefit of divine energy
in the reverie of synergy in the sensory.

The name Syncletica means to work with the call
that reflected the life of Adam  prior to the Fall.

The ascetic life taught prayer through abstinence
for moderation in the consumption of accident
or tactlessness.

How can young people work to purify the heart?
Human nature is the garden that needs to be cultivated from the start.

Experience has a broadness that reaches beyond the personal
but consequence holds the person accountable to the endurable.

Prayer seeks an answer to the contemplation of the word
insofar as logic with reason can rule out the absurd
to find the ability to function in situations that occur.

Scripture is a word that helps to consider the past
with the appeal to relation in the community designed for the task.

Law is the template to judge the morality of behavior
with respect for good polity as a sign of divine favor.

I will not stray from the path set by the commandments
as it is a course that my heart will seek for enhancement
with respect for age in advancement.

I treasure the word with my mind
that the discovery of wisdom will find
a way that does not sin as seen or as blind 

Blessed is the Creator of the seen and unseen
who provides the answer to prayer to keep the machine
clean with a functional glean.

I will declare that which warrants the statement
when my experience reveals the value of the placement.

I delight in the sight of Your revelation
as a sign of the divine delight in the celebration
of refinement in sublime insight for the striation 
of the station in sensation with respect for location. 

The interlocking precepts of interlocutors
will help me to see beyond the scope of the monocular.

I will meditate on the value of variant views
to fix my eyes on the best of what is true 
for me in relation to You. 

I will delight in the education You provide.
I will not forget Your word as my guide.

The Provider who provided providence
has also given reason for guidance
to the profit of trade alliance 
with the logic of evidence for defense
without cruelty, violence 
or deceptive contrivance


Open my eyes to behold
the wonder of things that unfold
as a vicarious experience told
that converts the imagination to gold
in the anticipation of actions bold.

I have lived as an alien to the grandness of the land.
Do not hide the benefits of Your providential plan. 

My soul is consumed with desire
for the consumption of my spirit with fire.

I long for the ordinance of order
that will delineate the boundaries for the border.

You rebuked the insolence of the accursed
who nursed the curse of the thirst to coerce. 

Send their scorn and contempt away
that their hostility may be replaced with the right way
to look at life as a functional play. 

Even though elected politicians may plot against me,
I will seek the policy of good polity for responsibility
with liberty in the law You can see.

Your words provide instruction for induction.
I delight in the degrees of unction in fluxion. 

The venerable old man had a good attitude.
He saw mystery as invitation to find knowledge with gratitude.

The faithful of Israel will be restored.
The blind will be able to see the glory of the Lord.

The ignorant will understand the meaning of the Word.
The lame will rejoice in the ability to get past the absurd.

Order has become the father to Israel.
Ephraim will no longer espouse vitriol.

The faithful will be respected as firstborn.
The firstborn will not lead the descent into scorn.

Cleopatra provided refuge for those who fled from Herod's Judea.
The gospel of Matthew reports that Joseph fled there with Mary and Jesus.

Out of Egypt the son was called after the death of Herod. 
He was taken to the land of Israel to Mary's home inherited.

Nazareth was a town of Galilee in her hills.
Jesus grew as a Nazorean in the prophecy fulfilled.

Blessed be the Father of our beloved Jesus Christ
who has blessed us from the heavenly heights.

We were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world
to be holy and blameless in love with wonders by the Spirit whirled.

We were destined for adoption as children through Christ 
according to the praise of the glorious grace bestowed by his sacrifice.

----------------------

Aleph
1st letter
Beati inmaculati
Blessed undefiled

1 Happy are those whose way is blameless,
    who walk in the law of the Lord.
2 Happy are those who keep his decrees,
    who seek him with their whole heart,
3 who also do no wrong,
    but walk in his ways.
4 You have commanded your precepts
    to be kept diligently.
5 O that my ways may be steadfast
    in keeping your statutes!
6 Then I shall not be put to shame,
    having my eyes fixed on all your commandments.
7 I will praise you with an upright heart,
    when I learn your righteous ordinances.
8 I will observe your statutes;
    do not utterly forsake me.

Beth
2d letter
In quo corrigit
How can

9 How can young people keep their way pure?
    By guarding it according to your word.
10 With my whole heart I seek you;
    do not let me stray from your commandments.
11 I treasure your word in my heart,
    so that I may not sin against you.
12 Blessed are you, O Lord;
    teach me your statutes.
13 With my lips I declare
    all the ordinances of your mouth.
14 I delight in the way of your decrees
    as much as in all riches.
15 I will meditate on your precepts,
    and fix my eyes on your ways.
16 I will delight in your statutes;
    I will not forget your word.

Gimel
3d letter
Tribue servo tuo
Give your servant

17 Deal bountifully with your servant,
    so that I may live and observe your word.
18 Open my eyes, so that I may behold
    wondrous things out of your law.
19 I live as an alien in the land;
    do not hide your commandments from me.
20 My soul is consumed with longing
    for your ordinances at all times.
21 You rebuke the insolent, accursed ones,
    who wander from your commandments;
22 take away from me their scorn and contempt,
    for I have kept your decrees.
23 Even though princes sit plotting against me,
    your servant will meditate on your statutes.
24 Your decrees are my delight,
    they are my counselors.

----------------------
================
-----------------------

How does this work?

Chn.  这是如何运作的?
            Zhè shì rúhé yùnzuò de?
Jpn.  これはどのように作動しますか?
           Kore wa dono yō ni sadō shimasu ka?
Krn.   이것은 어떻게 작동합니까?
            igeos-eun eotteohge jagdonghabnikka?
Ltn.   Quid opus est hoc?
Itn.    Come funziona?
Grk.   Πως λειτουργεί αυτό?
            Pos leitourgeí aftó?
Spn.   ¿Como funciona esto?
Frn.    Comment cela marche-t-il?
Gmn. Wie funktioniert das?
Dth.    Hoe werkt dit?
Hgn.   Hogy működik ez?
Trk.    Bu nasıl çalışıyor?
Rsn.    Как это работает?
           Kak eto rabotayet?

How is this supposed to work?
Will it go berserk if I give it a jerk?

---------------------------

Psalm 119

Psalm 119 has 176 verses divided into 22 stanzas. There is one stanza for each of the 22 characters that make up the Hebrew alphabet. Each of the eight verses of each stanza begins with the same letter in the Hebrew text.

This feature was not maintained in the Septuagint, but the name of the corresponding Hebrew letter was placed at the beginning of each stanza. The first has alef. The last has taw.

This psalm is one of about a dozen alphabetic acrostic poems in the Bible. The name of God (Yahweh/Jehovah) appears twenty-four times.

The acrostic form combined with the use of the Torah words constitute the framework for an elaborate prayer. The grounds for the prayer are established in the first two stanzas (alef and beth).

The Torah is held up as a source of blessing and right conduct. The psalmist pledges to dedicate himself to the law.

The prayer in the expression begins in the third stanza (gimel, v. 17). This prayer includes dramatic lament (e.g. verses 81-88), joyous praise (e.g. verses 45–48) and prayers for life, deliverance and vindication (e.g. v. 132-34). The combination of forms is like many other psalms

The uniqueness of Psalm 119 is found in the way that the requests are continually and explicitly grounded in the gift of the Torah and the psalmist's loyalty to it.

The first and fifth verses in a stanza often state the same theme followed by a statement of opposition, affliction or conflict. The final (eighth) verse tends to be a transition introducing the next stanza.
Aleph is the first letter of the Semitic abjads. It includes the Phoenician ʾālep 𐤀, Hebrew ʾālef א, Aramaic ʾālap 𐡀, Syriac ʾālap̄ ܐ and Arabic alif ا. It also appears as South Arabian 𐩱 and Ge'ez ʾنlef አ.

These letters are believed to have derived from an Egyptian hieroglyph depicting an ox's head. The Phoenician variant gave rise to the Greek alpha (ء), the Latin A and Cyrillic ہ.

The name aleph is derived from the West Semitic word for "ox". The shape of the letter derives from a Proto-Sinaitic glyph that depicts an ox's head. The glyph may have been based on an Egyptian hieroglyph.

The modern Arabic form literally means 'tamed' or 'familiar.' The same root in modern Hebrew can mean 'trained' when applied to pets or 'tamed' when referring to wild animals.

The Egyptian "vulture" hieroglyph is also referred to as aleph.

Beth is the second letter of the Semitic abjads. It includes the Phoenician Bēt, Hebrew Bēt ل, Aramaic Bēth, Syriac Bēṯ ܒ and Arabic Bāʾ.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to, among others, the Greek Beta, Latin B and Cyrillic ء, آ.
The name bet is derived from the West Semitic word for "house". The  shape of the letter derives from a Proto-Sinaitic glyph which depicts a house.

Gimel is the third letter of the Semitic abjads. The variants include Phoenician Gīml, Hebrew ˈGimel ג, Aramaic Gāmal, Syriac Gāmal ܓ and Arabic ǧīm ج . The letter may have been named after a weapon that was either a staff sling or a throwing stick in the hypothetical Proto-Canaanite form.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek gamma ( Γ , γ), the Latin C and G and the Cyrillic (C, c pronounced s) .

-----------------------

Love


Jeremiah 1:1-3 identifies the book as "the words of Jeremiah son of Hilkiah".

The Book of Jeremiah contains a considerable amount of material of a biographical and historical nature in addition to the prophet's own words. This material is especially valuable because it reveals the personality of the prophet more clearly than any of the other prophetic books.

The period in which Jeremiah lived was one of the most critical in Hebrew history. His public ministry began during the reign of King Josiah (640-609 BCE).

The background to Jeremiah is briefly described in the introduction to the book. Jeremiah began his prophetic mission in the 13th year of king Josiah (c. 627). His work was finished in the 11th year of king Zedekiah (586) "when Jerusalem went into exile in the sixth month."

One of the important events that took place a few years after Jeremiah began his prophetic work was the discovery of the book of the law in the Temple at Jerusalem. The main part of this work is now called the Book of Deuteronomy.

It was declared to be the word of Yahweh. King Josiah made it a part of the law of the land.

Jeremiah was enthusiastic about King Josiah's decision.  The law was intended to correct the social injustice that prevailed in the land. Practice associated with concession to foreign rule was seen as the cause for the injustice. Faithfulness to the law would protect the worship of Yahweh from contamination by the heartless influences from external forms.

The Deuteronomic reformation was a major change that had difficulty taking hold even according to the judgment of the kings who were being held accountable for their decisions regarding religious observance.

The good kings did not advocate participation in the rites of the longstanding polytheistic cults. They were brave in the proclamation of faith in the one God. They dedicated their service to the people of the land. They were judged to be faithful.

The bad ones saw participation in polytheistic rites as part of being vassals to the king of kings in the Middle East.

The collection of writings that make up the Book of Jeremiah includes oracles, addresses, prayers and exhortations made by the prophet.

The text is interspersed with materials that, though relevant to Jeremiah's work, were contributed by other persons. The material is arranged without strict topical or chronological order.

The authentic oracles of Jeremiah are probably to be found in the poetic sections of chapters 1-25. The book as a whole has been heavily edited. The prophet's followers including his scribe Baruch and later generations of Deuteronomists added material.

Chapters 1-10 describe how Jeremiah was called to prophesy. He warned Judah about the consequences for participation in the sin of the polytheistic religion. Judeans were criticized for their faithlessness.

Jeremiah felt that it was necessary to undermine the trust that people placed in external objects. The prophet declared that the day was coming when the Temple would be destroyed. The ark of the covenant would be taken away. The nation that called itself the chosen of Yahweh would be taken into captivity.

These statements aroused the anger of the priests and King Jehoiakim.

Jeremiah was charged with treason. He would probably have been put to death had not some of his friends succeeded in hiding him until the wrath of his enemies subsided.

Jeremiah dictated a series of oracles in which the policies of King Jehoiakim and his subordinates were severely criticized when it was no longer considered safe for him to appear in public.

Warnings were given concerning what would happen if the practices and the policy that preceded the Old Covenant were not changed.

Chapters 11-26 warned of the destruction that would be poured out on Judah. The constant worship of false idols and the sacrifices that were offered to them were cited as the cause for the anger of God.

Chapters 26-29 contain biographic material and interaction with other prophets.
Chapters 30-38 proclaim God's promise of restoration including Jeremiah's "new covenant".

The covenant has been interpreted differently from Christianity by Judaism.

The description in this section reported that the prophet had been lowered into a cistern as punishment for his prophesy regarding the fall of Jerusalem.

The prophet had also challenged the religious hypocrisy, economic dishonesty and oppressive practices of Judah’s leaders.

King Zedekiah eventually ordered him to be released from the well which the officials had placed him in as an alternative to the death penalty which they said his prophesy warranted.

Jeremiah contended that humans cannot change their nature by themselves. Such reform can occur only through cooperation with the one God.

Yahweh can act on human hearts only when humans recognize their need for it. The value for reform decreed by law had to be understood to be accepted.

Inner transformation in human nature was needed for the success of the reformative movement.

The Old Covenant was based on laws that were decreed as far back as the time of Moses. It was a contract or agreement between Yahweh and the Israelites in which the people agreed to obey all of the commandments given to them.

The Israelites did not live up to the terms of that agreement. Jeremiah believed that he knew the principal reasons why they had not done so. The wrongful motives of evil desire were ingrained as part of their human nature.

The only thing that could bring about a right relationship with Yahweh would be a change of heart. This change would create a new nature. Such a thing was unattainable except by means of the New Covenant in which Yahweh promised to do for the Israelites that which they could not do for themselves.

Chapter 31 spoke to the New Covenant.

Jeremiah 31:7-9

Thus says the LORD:
Sing aloud with gladness for Jacob
and raise shouts for the chief of the nations;
proclaim, give praise and say,
'Save, O LORD, you people,
the remnant of Israel.'

'See, I am going to bring them from the land of the north
and gather them from the farthest parts of the earth
among them the blind and the lame,
those with child and those in labor together.

'A great company shall return.
With weeping they shall come
and with consolations I will lead them back.
I will let them walk by brooks of water
in  straight path in which they shall not stumble.

'I have become a father to Israel
and Ephraim is my firstborn.'

----------------------

The faithful of Israel will be restored.
The blind will be able to see the glory of the Lord.

The ignorant will understand the meaning of the Word.
The lame will rejoice in the ability to get past the absurd.

Order has become a father to Israel.
Ephraim will no longer espouse vitriol.

The faithful will be respected as my firstborn.
The firstborn will not lead the descent into scorn.

=================

Jeremiah's prophetic ministry lasted until sometime after the fall of Jerusalem and the beginning of the Babylonian captivity. He encountered strong opposition from King Jehoiakim (609-598) and King Zedekiah (597-586). His life was threatened on more than one occasion.

The Babylonians permitted him to remain in his homeland. Many of his fellow countrymen were taken into captivity. He was taken to Egypt against his will by a group of exiles who found it necessary to flee Jerusalem for their own safety.

Jeremiah died in Egypt after a long and troublesome career.

Jeremiah's teaching had a profound effect on the development of both Judaism and Christianity. Many passages in the Christian scriptures indicate that both Jesus and Paul not only accepted certain ideas from Jeremiah but gave them a central place in their own interpretations of the meaning of religion.

-----------------------------

Introductory Blessing


Ephesus

Ephesus was an ancient Greek city on the coast of Ionia. It was located 3 kilometers (1.9 miles) southwest of present-day Selחuk in İzmir Province, Turkey.

It was built by Attic and Ionian Greek colonists in the 10th century BCE on the site of the former Arzawan capital. Arzawa was the western neighbor and rival of the Middle and New Hittite Kingdoms in Anatolia from the 15th to the 13th centuries.

The capital of the Kingdom of Arzawa was Apasa, the location that would be rebuilt as Ephesus. The  Achaeans of Mycenaean Greece and Arzawa formed a coalition against the Hittites in various periods.

It was one of the twelve cities of the Ionian League during the Classical Greek era (5th and 4th centuries). This period saw the annexation of much of modern-day Greece by the Persian Empire and its subsequent independence.

Classical Greece had a powerful influence on the Roman Empire and on the foundations of Western civilization. Modern Western politics, artistic thought in architecture and sculpture, scientific thought, theater, literature and philosophy originated during this period of Greek history.

The  Temple of Artemis was completed around 550. It became one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.

Artemis was the goddess of the hunt, the wilderness, wild animals, the Moon and chastity.
She was the daughter of Zeus and Leto and the twin sister of Apollo. She was the patron and protector of young girls.

She was one of the most widely venerated of the Ancient Greek deities. Her symbols were a bow and arrow, a quiver and hunting knives. The deer and the cypress were sacred to her. The goddess Diana was her Roman equivalent.

Two temples to Artemis had been destroyed on the site. One was ruined by a flood in the 7th century. The other was burned by arson in the 5th century. The greatest and last form was funded by the Ephesians.

The new temple was sponsored by Croesus, the founder of the Lydian empire and overlord of Ephesus.

It was designed and constructed from around 550 BC by the Cretan architect Chersiphron and his son Metagenes. It was 115 m (377 ft) long and 46 m (151 ft) wide, supposedly the first Greek temple built of marble.

Its peripteral columns stood some 13 m (40 ft) high, in double rows that formed a wide ceremonial passage around the cella that housed the goddess's cult image. Thirty-six of these columns were decorated by carvings in relief.

Heraclitus deposited his book "On Nature" as a dedication to Artemis in the great temple.

Among other monumental buildings were the Library of Celsus and a theater capable of holding 25,000 spectators.

Ephesos was one of the seven churches of Asia that are cited in the Book of Revelation.

The western portion of Asia Minor was known as the Roman province of Asia in the time of the apostles.

Ephesus was a great commercial center. Its harbor was crowded with ships. Its streets were thronged with people from every country. It presented a promising field for missionary effort like Corinth.

The city was a popular center for the worship of Diana. The fame of the magnificent temple of "Diana of the Ephesians" extended throughout all Asia and the world. Its splendor made it the pride of the nation.

The idol within the temple was declared by tradition to have fallen from the sky. Symbolic characters were inscribed upon it. The characters were believed to possess great power. Books had been written by the Ephesians to explain the meaning and use of these symbols.

Many magicians who wielded a powerful influence over the minds of the superstitious worshipers of the image within the temple were among those who gave close study to these costly books.

The magicians of those times have their counterpart in the spiritualistic mediums, the clairvoyants and the fortune-tellers of today. The mystic voices that spoke at Endor and at Ephesus are still misleading the superstitious.

Paul dealt with the magicians and soothsayers in Ephesus while struggling with state offices and pagans. The church was established and strengthened by his diligent labor. The city became the third important city of Christianity after Jerusalem and Antioch in a short time.

Ephesians

The letter to the Ephesians is the 10th book of the New Testament. The authorship is attributed to someone influenced by Paul's thought.

The Apostle Paul wrote the letter sometime around 62 CE while he was in prison in Rome according to tradition. This was about the same time as the epistle to the Colossians had been written. The two letters are similar in many points.

The letter's characteristically non-Pauline syntax, terminology and eschatology suggest a date about 20 years after the death of Paul.

Most English translations indicate that the letter was addressed to "the saints who are in Ephesus" (1:1). The words "in Ephesus" do not appear in the best and earliest manuscripts of the letter.

Marcion was a second-century heresiarch who created the first New Testament canon. He believed that the letter was actually addressed to the church at Laodicea.

The letter lacks personal greetings or any indication that the author has personal knowledge of his recipients. Paul had stayed in Ephesus for more than 2 years (Acts 19:1;20:1).

The introduction to the letter implies that Jesus is the Son of God, but it artfully refers to him as Christ. The implication that Christ was the Son was drawn out theologically at a later time.

Ephesians 1:3-6

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, just as he chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless before him in love. He destined us for adoption as his children through Jesus Christ according to the good pleasure of his will to the praise of his glorious grace that he freely bestowed on us in the Beloved.

----------------------

Blessed be the Father of our beloved Jesus Christ
who has blessed us from the heavenly heights.

We were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world
to be holy and blameless in love with wonders by the Spirit whirled.

We were destined for adoption as children through Christ
according to the praise of the glorious grace bestowed by his sacrifice.

=================

Nazorean


The name Judea is the English adaptation of the Greek Ioudaia. The Latin form was Iudaea. The contemporary English form is "Judah."

Judah was the 4th son of Jacob and Leah. HIs name means "thanksgiving" or "praise."
Yehudah was the name for an Israelite tribe. David was born to the tribe. He was the first king for the kingdom of that name. Saul was the first king for Israel and Judah.

The ancient Kingdom of Judah was derived from the tribal name. The kingdom existed from 934 until 586 BCE.

The name for the region continued to be incorporated through the Babylonian conquest, Persian, Hellenistic and Roman periods. The variants were Yehud, Yehud Medinata, Hasmonean Ioudaia and Roman Iudaea. 

Iudea with Herod


Herod was born around 73 BCE in Idumea, south of Judea.  Herod's father, Antipater was by descent an Edomite whose ancestors had converted to Judaism. Herod was raised as a Jew.

Herod's rise to power is largely due to his father's good standing relation with Julius Caesar, who entrusted Antipater with the public affairs of Judea.

John Hyrcanus II was the Hamonean King of Judea for one year (67-66 BCE), then the ethnarch (ruler) of Judea probably from 47-40 BCE. He had once summoned Herod to stand trial for murder. Herod determined to punish him for the action.

Herod was appointed provincial governor of Galilee in ca. 47 BCE when he was about 28 years old. He  farmed the taxes of that region for the Roman Senate. He met with success in ridding the area of bandits.

Antipater's elder brother, Phasael, served as governor of Jerusalem. The young Herod cultivated a good relationship with Sextus Caesar, the acting Roman governor of Syria. Sextus appointed Herod as general of Coelesyria and Samaria.

He enjoyed the backing of Rome, but the reports of his brutality were condemned by the Sanhedrin.
Herod and his brother Phasael were named as tetrarchs by the Roman leader Mark Antony in 41 BCE to support John Hyrcanus II.

Antigonus, Hyrcanus' nephew, took the throne from his uncle in alliance with the Parthians. Herod fled to Rome to consult with the Romans about the restoration of Hyrcanus II to power.

Pompey the Great had conquered Jerusalem in 63 BCE. This placed the region in the Roman sphere of influence. Herod was unexpectedly appointed King of the Jews by the Roman Senate in Rome around 40 BCE.

Herod went back to Judea to win his kingdom from Antigonus. He married the grandaughter of Hyrcanus II, Mariamne I, near the end of the campaign. Mariamne was also the niece of Antingonus.

The marriage was an attempt to win favor with the Jewish population. Herod was already married to Doris. They had a son, Antipater. Doris and her son were banished to make room for Herod's next move in his rise to power.

Herod set out with a large army to capture Jerusalem with Sosius, the governor of Syria, in 37 BCE. Antigonus was sent to Marc Antony for execution. Herod took the title of basileus (Βασιλεύς, "king") as the sole ruler of Jerusalem. He ended the Hasmonean dynasty and started the Herodian.

John Hyrcanus had conquered the region of Idumaea, the Edom of the Hebrew Bible, in a campaign that lasted from 140-130 BCE. He had required all Idumaeans to obey Jewish law or to leave. Most Idumaeans converted. A number of them intermarried with the Jews and adopted their customs. This meant that the males had to be circumcised.

It was thought that while Herod had complied with the external customs, his political actions were reckless or decadent. It was reported that he executed several members of his own family, including his wife Mariamne I.

Herod's rule marked a new beginning in the history of Judea. Judea had been ruled autonomously by the Hasmonean kings from 140 until 63 BCE.

The Hasmonean kings retained their titles, but became clients of Rome after the conquest by Pompey in 63 BCE.

Herod overthrew the Hasmonean Antigonus in the 3-year-long war between 37 and 34 BCE. He ruled under Roman overlordship until his death ca. 1 CE. When he passed on the throne to his sons it established the Herodian dynasty.

Herod was granted the title of "King of Judea" by the Roman Senate in 40 BCE. He was a vassal of the Roman Empire. He was expected to support the interests of his Roman patrons as such.

His rule faced 2 threats when he obtained leadership in Judea. The first threat came from his mother-in-law Alexandra, who sought to regain power for her family, the Hasmoneans.

Cleopatra married the Roman leader Antony in the same year.  Alexandra asked Cleopatra for aid in making Aristobulus III the High Priest.

Aristobulus III might partially repair the fortunes of the Hasmoneans if made High Priest. Cleopatra presented the request to Antony but urged Alexandra to leave Judea with Aristobulus III and visit Antony.

Herod received word of this plot. He feared that if Antony met Aristobolus III in person he might name Aristobulus III King of Judea. This threat induced Herod to order the assassination of Aristobulus in 35 BCE. This ended this first threat to Herod's throne.

Antony's marriage to Cleopatra in 37 BCE also sparked a power struggle between Roman leaders Octavian, who would later be called Augustus, and Antony.

Herod owed his throne to Rome. He had to pick a side. He chose Antony.

Antony lost to Octavian at Actium in 31 BCE. This posed a second threat to Herod's rule. Herod had to regain Octavian's support if he was to keep his throne.

Herod convinced Octavian at Rhodes in 31 BCE that he would be loyal to him through his ability to keep Judea open to Rome as a link to the wealth of Syria and Egypt and his ability to defend the frontier.

Herod continued to rule his subjects as he saw fit. Restrictions were placed upon him in his relations with other kingdoms despite the autonomy afforded to Herod in his internal reign over Judea.

Herod's support from the Roman Empire was a major factor in enabling him to maintain his authority.

Josephus characterizes Herod's rule in generally favorable terms in The Jewish War. The tyrannical authority that many scholars have come to associate with Herod's reign came out more in the Jewish Antiquities.

Herod's despotic rule was demonstrated by many of his security measures. He used secret police to monitor and report the feelings of the general populace towards him. He sought to prohibit protests and had opponents removed by force.

He had a bodyguard of 2,000 soldiers. His personal guard took part in his funeral. It included the Doryphnoroi, a Thracian, Celtic (probably Gallic) and Germanic contingent.

While the term Doryphnoroi does not have an ethnic connotation, the unit was probably composed of distinguished veteran soldiers and young men from the most influential Jewish families.

Thracians had served in the Jewish armies since the Hasmonean dynasty. The Celtic contingent were former bodyguards of Cleopatra. They were given as a gift by Augustus to Herod following the Battle of Actium.

The Germanic contingent was modeled upon Augustus's personal bodyguard, the Germani Corporis Custodes. These were responsible for guarding the palace.

Cleopatra in Egypt


Roman rule had been preceded by the Ptolemaic and Persian dominions.

The groundwork for Ptolemaic rule began in 332 BCE. Alexander III of Macedon conquered Egypt with little resistance as part of his campaign to defeat the Persians.

He was welcomed by the Egyptians as a deliverer. He visited Memphis and went on pilgrimage to the oracle of Amun at the Oasis of Siwa. The oracle declared him to be the son of Amun-Re. He conciliated the Egyptians by the respect which he showed for their religion.

While Macedonians commanded military garrisons at Memphis and Pelusium, Alexander left the civil administration in local control. There were two, later one governor.

Alexander founded Alexandria to be a major commercial port. It became Egypt's commercial and administrative capital as well as its intellectual center.

Ptolemaic Egypt began when Ptolemy I Soter declared himself Pharaoh of Egypt in 305 BCE after the death of Alexander (323 BCE).

All the male rulers of the dynasty took the name Ptolemy. Ptolemaic queens regnant, some of whom were the sisters of their husbands, were usually called Cleopatra, Arsinoe or Berenice.

The Ptolemaic Kingdom was a powerful Hellenistic state. It extended from southern Syria in the east to Cyrene to the west and south to the frontier with Nubia.

The most famous member of the line was the last queen, Cleopatra VII. She was known for her role in the Roman political battles between Julius Caesar and Pompey. Later she was engaged in the dispute between Octavian and Mark Antony.

Her apparent suicide at the conquest by Rome marked the end of Ptolemaic rule in Egypt. Ptolemaic rule ended with the death of Queen Cleopatra VII and the Roman conquest in 30 BCE.

Galilee

Galilee was named by the Israelites in the Bible as the tribal region for Naphthali and Dan. The Tribe of Dan was the hereditary local law enforcement and judiciary for the whole nation. They were dispersed in the lands for all the tribes. The region is generally referred to as Naphthali as a result.

Galilee had a tradition of political autonomy. The northern traditions that go into the Hebrew Bible are informed by this political sensibility of autonomy. The tribal confederacy that had started during the period of the Judges was part of the northern Kingdom of Israel before and after the conquest by Assyria.

Upper Galilee is the more remote area to the extreme north. Lower Galilee borders the Sea of Galilee on the east and the Mediterranean Ocean on the west. People were speaking Aramaic and Hebrew in the north. They spoke Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek.

The name “Galilee” comes from the Hebrew word galil which means “circle” or “region”. The region of Galilee in the first century CE was encircled by Syro-Phoenicia stretching along the eastern Mediterranean coastline and northwards, by Gaulanitis to the north-east, by the Hellenistic settlements of Decapolis to the south-east and by Samaria to the south. Samaria separated Galilee geographically from Judea.

Most of Galilee consists of rocky terrain at heights of between 500 and 700 m (1640-2300 ft.). Several high mountains are in the region. Mount Tabor and Mount Meron are included.

The climate has relatively low temperatures and high rainfall. Flora and fauna thrive in the region as a result. Many birds annually migrate from colder climates to Africa and back through the Hula–Jordan corridor.

The streams and waterfalls, the latter mainly in Upper Galilee, along with vast fields of greenery and colorful wildflowers. The natural beauty and numerous towns of biblical importance make the region a popular tourist destination.

Much of the Galilee region was conquered and annexed by the first Hasmonean King of Judaea Aristobulus I (104 - 103 BCE) during the expansion of the Hasmonean dynasty.

The Roman emperor Augustus appointed his son Herod Antipas as tetrarch of Galilee after the death of Herod the Great. The government for the territory remained a Roman client state.

Antipas was a capable ruler. Josephus does not record any instance of him using force to put down an uprising and he had a long, prosperous reign.

Antipas rebuilt the city of Sepphoris and founded the new city of Tiberias in either 18 CE or 19 CE. These two cities became Galilee's largest cultural centers. They were the main centers of Greco-Roman influence, but were still predominantly Jewish.

A large gap existed between the rich and poor, but the lack of uprisings suggest that taxes were not exorbitantly high. Most Galileans probably did not feel their livelihoods were being threatened.

The archaeological discoveries of synagogues from the Hellenistic and Roman period in the area show strong Phoenician influences and tolerance for other cultures.

Antipas married his half-niece Herodias late in his reign. She was already married to one of her other uncles. His wife, whom he divorced, fled to her father Aretas, an Arab king, who invaded Galilee. He defeated Antipas's troops before their withdrawal.

Both Josephus and the Gospel of Mark 6:17–29 record that the itinerate preacher John the Baptist criticized Antipas over his marriage. Antipas consequently had him imprisoned and beheaded.

Antipas went to Rome around 39 CE to request that he be elevated from the status of tetrarch to the status of king at the urging of Herodias. The Romans found him guilty of storing arms. He was removed from power and exiled. This ended his forty-three-year reign.

Nazareth is currently known as "the Arab capital of Israel." The inhabitants are predominantly Arab citizens of Israel. Muslims constitute 69% of the population. Christians make up 30.9%. Old Nazareth had a Jewish population of 40,312 in 2014.

"Nazareth" is derived from one of the Hebrew words for 'branch', namely ne·ṣer, ‏נֵ֫צֶר‎. The prophetic, messianic words in Book of Isaiah 11:1 stated, 'from (Jesse's) roots a Branch (netzer) will bear fruit'.
Modern-day Nazareth is nestled in a natural bowl which reaches from 320 meters (1050 ft.) above sea level to the crest of the hills about 488 meters (1600 ft.).

The presence of kochim tombs with fragments from ossuaries found by archaeologists indicates that the people living there were Jewish during the time of Jesus.

Research indicates that the village had a population of 400 and one public bath. The mikva was important for civic and religious purposes. Bathers were cleansed for in physical and ritualistic senses.

Matt. 2:13-15; 19-23

Now after they had left an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, 'Get up, take the child and his mother and flee to Egypt. Remain there until I tell you. Herod is about to search for the child to destroy him.' Then Joseph got up took the child and his mother by night and went to Egypt and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet, 'Out of Egypt I have called my son.'

When Herod died, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt and said, 'Get up, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel for those who were seeking the child's life are dead.'

Joseph got up, took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. When he heard that Archelaus was ruling over Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. After being warned in a dream, he went away to the district of Galilee. There he made his home in a town called Nazareth so what had been spoken through the prophets might be fulfilled, 'He will be called a Nazorean.'

----------------------

Cleopatra provided refuge for those who fled from Herod's Judea.
The gospel of Matthew reports that Joseph fled there with Mary and Jesus.

Out of Egypt this son was called after the death of Herod.
He was taken to the land of Israel to Mary's home inherited.

Nazareth was a town of Galilee in her hills.
Jesus grew as a Nazorean in the prophecy fulfilled.

=================

wiki Herod the Great
wiki Herodian Kingdom of Judea
3 Client Kings of Rome

-------------------------

Monastic Life


Sarah, Theodora and Syncletica of Egypt
Lectionary

Diocletian's reign (284–305 CE) marked the transition from the Roman to the Byzantine era in Egypt. A number of the Egyptian Christians who were persecuted left civilization to find refuge in the wilderness.

The New Testament had by then been translated into Egyptian. This became the basic text that motivated the pragmatic ascetics to seek guidance from the Father in heaven.

The Desert Mothers were female Christian ascetics living in the desert of Egypt, Palestine and Syria in the 4th and 5th centuries. They typically lived in the monastic communities that began forming during that time.

Some lived as hermits. The experience of solitary existence was thought to be a conversation with the Creator. Prayer combined with fasting was the ascetic mode for communication.

Communication with the unseen Father was an exercise in looking at the design of nature for the economy of life. The discovery of wisdom in truth became the motivation to express the discovery to others.

Expressions that resonated beyond the experience of other monks was shared with those who sought wisdom that could be applied to civilization.

Egypt was the Motherland for Christian monasticism.

A distinct Egyptian Coptic Church was firmly recognized as established by the Council of Chalcedon in 451.

Coptic asceticism had formed the original foundation for Christian Monasticism. Anthony went into the wilderness of Egypt around 285.  He organized a kind of monastic life for his disciples in about 305.

Abba Anthony  became the first one to be called "monk" (Gr: μοναχός). He was the first to establish a Christian monastery. The Monastery of Abba Anthony in the Red Sea area is the oldest in the western world.

Anthony's way of life was focused on solidarity with those seeking wisdom in the solitary life.

Abba Pachomius the Cenobite was a Copt from Upper Egypt. He established communal monasticism in his monasteries in upper Egypt. His work laid the basic monastic structure for many of the monasteries outside of Coptic orthodoxy.

Women from that era influenced the early ascetic or monastic tradition while living outside the desert were called Desert Mothers.

Men and women leading the chaste life gained a reputation for wisdom in speech and their ascetic economy of life. Apologists pointed to them as examples of Christian conduct despite the austere conditions in which they lived.

The voluntary renunciation of worldly possessions for the experience of poverty was not only an exercise in learning how to pray while abstaining from a normal diet. The monks who led the way into a chosen way had the motivation to write about the experience in order to communicate something of the value to the broader community.

Origen, Cyprian and Pamphilus became teachers who gave instruction with their written work. Their instruction helped to form agreement in doctrine regarding the divine nature of the Son as a settlement of the Christological issue of relationship with God the Father.

The literature of the Desert Fathers is well known because most of the early lives of the saints "were written by men for a male monastic audience." Even the occasional stories about the Desert Mothers come from the early Desert Fathers and their biographers.

The desert women had an important place in the leadership role within the Christian community. There are several chapters dedicated to the Desert Mothers in the Lausiac History by Palladius. He mentioned 2,975 women living in the desert.

Other sources include the various stories told over the years about the lives of saints of that era, traditionally called vitae ("life"). The lives of twelve female desert saints are described in Book I of Vitae Patrum (Lives of the Fathers).

The Desert Mothers were known as ammas ("spiritual mothers"). They were comparable to the Desert Fathers (abbas) due to the respect they earned as spiritual teachers and directors.

One of the most well known Desert Mothers was Amma Syncletica of Alexandria, who had twenty-seven sayings attributed to her in the Apophthegmata Patrum, or Sayings of the Desert Fathers.
Two other ammas, Theodora of Alexandria and Amma Sarah of the Desert, also had sayings in that book.

Amma Syncletica was born to wealthy parents in Alexandria sometime around 270. She was said to have lived to her eighties in about 350. She was well educated. Her education included an early study of the writings of Desert Father Evagrius Ponticus.

She sold everything and gave the money to the poor after the death of her parents. She lived as a hermit among the tombs outside of Alexandria. She moved outside the city with her blind sister.

A community of women ascetics grew up around her gradually. She served as their spiritual mother. Syncletica taught that moderation was the lesson that she had drawn from her experience as an ascetic and hermit, Asceticism was not an end in itself. It was the means to attain experiential knowledge.

Theodora of Alexandria was the amma of a monastic community of women near Alexandria. She had fled to the desert disguised as a man prior to that and joined a community of monks. She was sought out by many of the Desert Fathers for advice. It was reported that Bishop Theophilus of Alexandria came to her for counsel.

The sayings of Sarah of the Desert indicate that she was a hermit living by a river for sixty years. Her sharp replies to some of the old men who challenged her show a distinctly strong personality.

Two male anchorites decided to humiliate her in the desert according to one story. They said, "Be careful not to become conceited thinking to yourself." Anchorites were required to take a vow of stability of place. They chose to live in cells often attached to a church.

She replied, "Look how anchorites are coming to see me, a mere woman." She added, "According to nature I am a woman, but not according to my thoughts."

----------------------

Sayings:

Amma Sarah said, "If I prayed God that all people should approve of my conduct, I should find myself a penitent at the door of each one, but I shall rather pray that my heart may be pure toward all."

Amma Syncletica said, "In the beginning there are a great many battles and a good deal of suffering for those who are advancing towards God and afterwards, ineffable joy. It is like those who wish to light a fire; at first they are choked by the smoke and cry, and by this means obtain what they seek ... so we must also kindle the divine fire in ourselves through tears and hard work."

Amma Syncletica said, "There are many who live in the mountains and behave as if they were in the town; they are wasting their time. It is possible to be a solitary in one's mind while living in a crowd; and it is possible for those who are solitaries to live in the crowd of their own thoughts."

----------------------

The name Syncletica means to work with the call
that reflected the life of Adam  prior to the Fall.

The ascetic life teaches prayer through abstinence
for moderation in the consumption of accident
or tactlessness.

================

Amma Theodora said that neither asceticism, nor vigils, nor any kind of suffering are able to save. Only true humility can do that. There was a hermit who was able to banish the demons. And he asked them: "What makes you go away? Is it fasting?" They replied: "We do not eat or drink." "Is it vigils?"

They said: "We do not sleep." "Then what power sends you away?" They replied: "Nothing can overcome us except humility alone." Amma Theodora said: "Do you see how humility is victorious over the demons?"

-----------------------

The Church


Richard Hooker

The Church of England adopted a position that allowed for the conservative modification of public policy with respect for reason in the determination of goodness. It was allowed that the benefit of the Church was identified with the monarch who would choose to defend her from enemies foreign or domestic.

This was not to fly in the face of all that had been accomplished with Church leadership out of Rome. There was still agreement with that which was right about policy for national sovereignty by the Pope with the college of cardinals.

The build toward cultural Christian unity with the consensus of agreement between nations with different languages was cultivated with the emperor as the king of kings for the European continent.
The build towards greater unity was seen as endangered by the claim to papal supremacy as supported by the investiture of selection of clergy by the Catholic authority.

The Vatican had made itself into a state authority that was separate from and placed itself over royal leadership. It was all male and all single except for those who chose to act as aristocratic in political dominion.

These were married and acted as magistrates who had offenders punished with corporal or capital punishment. There was question as to whether their judgment wasn't for their benefit at the expanding expense of the public.

The gradual development of royal authority for European unity became questionable as an evolutionary process when colonial expansion for global domination became the basis of the competition for the domination of imperial leadership with the practice of the Inquisition, indulgences and the competition for the natural resources in lands occupied by primitive natives.

The benefit of trade with primitive people was threatened by the exploitation of their labor with slavery.

The royals in the majority of kingdoms opposed slavery as something that was antithetical to Christian society. The common people without education were encouraged to identify the royal position as corrupt.

The institution of monarchy was viewed as subject to the corruption of the benefit of the royals for their personal benefit even though the placement of the authority for the House of Commons was being placed over that for the monarchy.

The vision of Isaiah had advocated for the establishment of the royal line of succession as the means by which damage caused by the competition for the top spot could be reduced.

The promise of benefit for the people of the kingdom was indicated as a conservative and progressive value. The royal family was to act as a model for this value so they could be seen as such.

Benefit from such a vision was not accepted by polytheistic society. Stories about competition with violence or cruelty were circulated in opposition to the association of royal leadership with the absolute.

Executive authority was only a step in the direction of the cultivation of domination of political leadership by the military for trade by the patrician class. The position of consul had a one year and usually a one time tenure that could be used by the plebians to ascend to the patrician position of status in society.

Leadership at the inception of the US republic defined public safety as the basis for having a national government. Monarchy was defined as corrupt for the sake of the experiment in self-determination by selection with election to public office.

When Alexander had been asked to select a successor to his position of leadership, it is reported that he simply stated "the best."

Royal succession was established after his empire was divided between his leading officers. Leadership by occupancy in foreign lands was limited to the administration of a system of election if only because of the success of the Republic in Rome.

When the Roman republic took over in power the state still favored self-determination with election, but the line of succession for the emperor was not seen as royal because he could select a successor by adoption. The succession could be modified by the emperor's choice.

Patricians viewed this innovation to republic as the action of a dictator. The subjection of imperial authority to the will of the patricians and the plebians was dictated as necessary for the recognition of the office as for the people. The distinction for the benefit of the patricians was dropped explicitly for the sake of the association of the lower class with the people.

The existence of poor people came to be used as a proof of the corruption of executive leadership even in elected office. That poverty was increased for the benefit of the demands of dictate by the lower house of representation by the party that refuses to acknowledge republic as a democracy is denied as a plausibility.

Ecclesiastical Lawes
Text
Book 1, Ch. 1, S. 1
The Cause for Discourse     

Richard Hooker has set the stage for the reasonable consideration of political government with his work on ecclesiastical law. The simple observation that there is good or bad leadership in polity allowed for self-determination by election in the framework of the success of the line of succession for executive authority with policy for the public.

Hooker expressed his distaste for demagoguery in the Ecclesiastical Lawes. He argued that those who seek to persuade a multitude that they are not as well governed as they ought to be will find those who listen.

Precedent for the Force of Law



The established government can be criticized for evident defects, but it is the proposal for replacement by untested proceedings that begs the question for improvement. The discontent simply want to replace the elect with something different, not necessarily better.

The contest for election should be determined by the consideration of what is necessarily better or the contest lacks value for the public.

The open reproval for the supposed disorders of the state are taken to be friendly to the principled benefit of all in terms of the color for the freedom of mind for what passes for good in the current criticism of disorder. 

He wrote, "That which wanteth in the weight of their speech, is supplied by the aptness of men’s minds to accept and believe it."

-------------------------

The demand for radical change
is the reason that this discourse seems strange.

That which is wanted in the weight of their speech
is supplied by the aptness of the undecided to believe.

The radicals want to change everything for them.
They would overthrow the state of the union for their dictum.

Opposition to the radical insists on regression
though the need for reform stands as a profession.

Moral polity is directed to conservative reform.
Even good change is inconvient to the status formed.

===========

If that which has been established is defended as the necessary state of affairs on the other hand, then the prejudice that is rooted in the heart is allowed as preferred without argument. Long practice and usage however carry the force of law.

Conservative Reform

It seems that the redemption of reason for conservative reform is recommended as the course for manageable improvement.

C.D. Broad would eventually advise that precedent should not be replaced unless it was by something as good or better.

The chief executive official might not be re-elected to serve another term in office, but the conservative model for royal succession was an argument for conservative reform in republican government.

There were no term limits for the president of the US until the 22d amendment was ratified in 1951. It was enacted with the certainty that only the chief executive could be found guilty of corruption for his or her own benefit.

Corruption from Congressional officials was believed manageable on a case by case basis. The thought that a party could be guilty of corruption has not been viewed as plausible.

Term limits were established after FDR as a presumed benefit for the Republicans, but he enacted socialist policies for the American government.

This left the precedents established by his presidency as a benefit to the socialists in the Democrat party.

This political action took place prior to the impeachment of Nixon by a couple of decades. Nixon was actually an advocate for idealistic pragmatism. He ordered the reduction of troops from Vietnam in response to protests from the American public.

The accusation of criminal conduct by the Watergate scandal was pressed as a foregone conclusion by the leftist media. The issue of troop reduction was obscured for the sake of the call for impeachment.

The president was accused of having ordered a break-in to DNC HQ at Watergate. While he protested that he was not a crook, the media presented the impeachment by the House as proof of his guilt.
---------------------

Active Literacy


Umberto Eco
b. 1.5.1932  Alessandria, Italy
d. 2.19.2016 Milan, Italy

Umberto Eco was an Italian novelist and university professor. He was a polymath in semiotics.
He is widely known for  the novel Il nome della rosa (The Name of the Rose).

The novel was published in 1980. The text was an artful reworking of Conan Doyle. Sherlock Holmes was transplanted to 14th-century Italy as a Franciscan friar. His associate in investigation was a Benedictine novice.

The work was a historical mystery that combined semiotics in fiction with biblical analysis, medieval studies and literary theory. It was translated into 30 languages, it sold more than 10m copies worldwide. A film starring Sean Connery as the monk-detective, William of Baskerville, was made.

He later wrote other novels, including Il pendolo di Foucault (Foucault's Pendulum) and L'isola del giorno prima (The Island of the Day Before). His novel Il cimitero di Praga (The Prague Cemetery) was released in 2010. It topped the bestseller charts in Italy.

Eco also wrote academic texts, children's books and essays. He edited and translated books from French into Italian. Raymond Queneau’s “Exercises in Style” (1983) was an example.

He was the founder of the Department of Media Studies at the University of the Republic of San Marino, president of the Graduate School for the Study of the Humanities at the University of Bologna, member of the Accademia dei Lincei and an honorary fellow of Kellogg College, Oxford.

Eco was honored with the Kenyon Review Award for Literary Achievement in 2005 along with Roger Angel.

Umberto Eco
S. 翁贝托生态
T.  翁貝託生態

翁 Weng    old man                翁 o         venerable          Un  うん    ウン       Um 움 cellar                 
贝 bei         shellfish               貝 bai      shellfish             be   べ       ベ           be   베 best         
托  tuo        entrust                 託 taku    consign               ru    る       ル          leu   르 porn           
生  Sheng   to be born            生 sei       life                      to    と        ト         to     토 sat         
态  tai          attitude               態 tai        atttitude              E     え       エ           e      에  on     
                                                                                           ko   こ       コ           ko    코  nose         
_______________

The venerable old man had a good attitude.
He saw mystery as an invitation to find knowledge with gratitude.

================


Sunday, December 22, 2019

Define

12.29

Alison Brie

Define
Portion
定义部分
Dìngyì bùfèn
部分を定義
Bubun o teigi
ps119.49
Define pars

Remember your word to the child in your service.
You had given me hope in the production of surplus.

The public's ownership of private property is for the public.
Even a celestial scarecrow can dance with the muppets.

The push to make private property public
reduces the capacity to care for one's own uplift.

The defense of person or property
is a right for those who choose to see
natural design providentially. 

This is my comfort in the time of hardship.
Your love gives my life of faith promise. 

I have not turned from your law
though belief in cruelty has defined me as a flaw.

I take comfort in the memory of your judgment.
The influx of your uncreated energy has helped with adjustment.

I remember your Name for what you have done.
Your deliverance from darkness has been won
for life in the light of the sun.

Your statutes have been like songs
whenever I have learned to right my wrongs.

I have learned how to see what your law meant
because I dedicated my soul to your commandments.

Your word leads me to my portion of your providence
with confidence in the consciousness of consonance 
with the owner's provenance.

I have promised to keep your words
to overcome hardship, adversity and the absurd.

I entreat you with my heart
to grant mercy on your part.

I have considered ideals 
for pragmatic deals
and the practice of policy
that doesn't abolish me.

I do not tarry 
when it comes time to carry
my weight for your love
to wait for the Spirit as a dove.

I define my purpose with logic for function
to complete my role in the conjunction
of induction with deduction. 

Though the cords of insecurity seek to entangle my memory,
I won't concede conceptually to treachery
by the false perception of the sensory.



Deception is the art of magicians.
It teaches a lesson in testing the positions
of politicians for provision by the vision 
of the mission.



The appearance of an event doesn't always show an agent as the cause.
Even the roll of the dice was supposed to be an accidental element to what the outcome was. 

I am filled with indignant station 
for the generation of invalid vexation.

How much does this cost?
Is time all that has been lost?  

I will rise to give thanks at night
for righteous judgment with insight.

I am a companion to those who have the faith
to keep your commandments at length for what's great.

The earth is full of the love of creation.
Matter expresses the substance of design for elation.

You have done well in instruction for service
with the definition of purpose to be purchased. 

Teach me the discernment of knowledge for wisdom
in the business of showing vision with rhythm for a system.

I had gone astray when I was afflicted
with an addiction that was predicted 
as restrictive and constricted
in a way that had been depicted.

I have learned that it has been your word
that helped me infer behavior that is preferred.

You are the good that brings forth goodness
with instruction from the hoodless
in how to avoid hoodiness.

Liars have smeared me with lies
but I will keep my faith despite their tries
to force me to do otherwise.

Their heart is engrossed with flaw
but my delight is in your law.

I incurred a lesson in how not to be
from those who have afflicted me.

The words of your law are more dear 
than thousands of words filled with false cheer.

Jerusalem is a jewel in the land of promise.
The bride is adorned with the sparkle of solace.

The nations see glory in the vindication of your existence.
Exculpation exonerates the confirmation of faithful persistence. 

Christ came that we might be justified by faith.
The Son was born of woman under the law as great.

The Spirit of the Son has been sent into our hearts
because we are children who cry to the Father for our part. 

You are no longer a slave but a child.
As a child you are an heir both reconciled and mild.

---------------------

Zayin
7th letter
Memor esto verbi tui
Remember the word you

49 Remember your word to your servant,
because you have given me hope.
50 This is my comfort in my trouble,
that your promise gives me life.
51 The proud have derided me cruelly,
but I have not turned from your law.
52 When I remember your judgments of old,
O Lord, I take great comfort.
53 I am filled with a burning rage,
because of the wicked who forsake your law.
54 Your statutes have been like songs to me
wherever I have lived as a stranger.
55 I remember your Name in the night, O Lord,
and dwell upon your law.
56 This is how it has been with me,
because I have kept your commandments.

Heth
8th letter
Portio mea, Domine
My portion, Dominated

57 You only are my portion, O Lord;
I have promised to keep your words.
58 I entreat you with all my heart,
be merciful to me according to your promise.
59 I have considered my ways
and turned my feet toward your decrees.
60 I hasten and do not tarry
to keep your commandments.
61 Though the cords of the wicked entangle me,
I do not forget your law.
62 At midnight I will rise to give you thanks,
because of your righteous judgments.
63 I am a companion of all who fear you
and of those who keep your commandments.
64 The earth, O Lord, is full of your love;
instruct me in your statutes.

Teth
9th letter
Bonitatem fecisti
You have done well

65 O Lord, you have dealt graciously with your servant,
according to your word.
66 Teach me discernment and knowledge,
for I have believed in your commandments.
67 Before I was afflicted I went astray,
but now I keep your word.
68 You are good and you bring forth good;
instruct me in your statutes.
69 The proud have smeared me with lies,
but I will keep your commandments with my whole heart.
70 Their heart is gross and fat,
but my delight is in your law.
71 It is good for me that I have been afflicted,
that I might learn your statutes.
72 The law of your mouth is dearer to me
than thousands in gold and silver.

-----------------------
=================
-----------------------

Zayin- sword; weapon (Phoenician rt.)
Heth- portion; court (Egyptian rt.)
Teth- wheel (Phoenician rt.); good

How much does this cost?
Chn.  这个多少钱?
            Zhège duōshǎo qián?
Jpn.  この費用はいくらですか?
           Kono hiyō wa ikuradesu ka?
Krn.  이 얼마예요?
           i eolmayeyo?
Ltn.  Quanti hoc cost?
Itln. Quanto costa questo?
Grk. Πόσο κοστίζει αυτό?
          Póso kostízei aftó?
Spn. ¿Cuánto cuesta este?
Frn.  Combien ça coûte?
Gmn. Wieviel kostet das?
Hgn.   Mennyibe kerül?
Trk.    Ne kadar ediyor?
Rsn.   Сколько это стоит?

-----------------------

Psalm 119


Psalm 119 is a hymn about the perfection that is found with the law. A hymn is a song of praise that celebrates the work of the divine energy in history.

This hymn has 176 verses. The number makes it the longest psalm. It is also the chapter with the most verses in the bible.

It is a prayer of one who delights in and lives by the moral code of the Torah as the sacred law.

The psalm is arranged in an acrostic pattern. There are 22 letters in the Hebrew alphabet. The  hymn contains 22 units of 8 verses each.

Each of the 22 sections is given to a letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Each line in that section begins with that letter.

The closest parallel to this pattern in Scripture is found in Lamentations 3. This chapter is also divided into 22 sections. There are a few other passages in the Hebrew Scriptures which use an acrostic pattern.

The author is unnamed. The celebration of perfection as the aim for the law gives the style a post-exilic characteristic. Scripture is mentioned in at least 171 of the 176 verses.

Here are 8 basic words used to describe the Scriptures as the written revelation. Law or torah is used 25 times. Word or dabar is used 24 times. Judgments or mispatim is used 23 times.

Testimonies or edot is used 23 times. Commandments is used 22 times. Statutes is used 21 times. Precepts is used 21 times. Word or imrah is used 19 times.

Piety is defined as a love of God that is not desiccated by study but refreshed, informed and nourished by it.

The 57th verse uses the Hebrew letter heth. Heth is derived from the Egyptian letter for court yard. The Hebrew word for “portion” translates into “inheritance or part.”

---------------------

Zion


Third Isaiah was composed after the return from Exile. This section included chapters 56-66.
Isaiah 44:6 contains the first clear statement of monotheism: "I am the first and I am the last; beside me there is no God".

This concept was developed in contrast to the god of gods as a theological justification for the king of kings in the Middle Eastern political hierarchy.

It is worth noting that the Achaemanid, Greek and Roman empires had a single emperor that appointed governors to govern the provinces. The Achaemanids selected Nehemiah to govern.

The Greeks appointed a foreigner. The Romans allowed a Idumean to act as a client king until the monarchy was dissolved with the destruction of Jerusalem.

The model for monotheism became the defining characteristic of post-Exilic Judaism. It eventually became the basis for Christianity and Islam.

The four so-called Songs of the Suffering Servant from Isaiah 42, 49, 50 and 52 call upon the servant to lead the nations. The servant was horribly abused, sacrificed himself in accepting the punishment due others and was finally rewarded.

Some Second Temple texts including the Wisdom of Solomon and the Book of Daniel identified the Servant as a group. The "wise" would "will lead many to righteousness" (Daniel 12:3). The Similitudes of Enoch understood the oracle in messianic terms.

The earliest Christians built on this second tradition. Isaiah 52:13–53:12 presented the fourth of the songs. It was interpreted as a prophecy of the death and exaltation of Jesus. This role was accepted by Jesus according to Luke 4:17–21.

Promises made to the Jews for the return out of captivity are viewed as indicators that Trito-Isaiah wrote after the exile. Clothing in the garments of salvation was testimony that the promise would be extended to the ends of the earth.

The promises have been interpreted as from Christ to the Church. There must have been a hope that monotheism would result in one official state religion for the realm. Problems for the state did not arise until the official faith was treated as the only legal religion.

The amendment against law by Congress for the establishment of religion or against the free exercise of it was the product of the Spirit of the bible as inferred in opposition to the Inquisition, Crusades, Witch Hunts, indulgences, slavery or religious persecution by the state.

The practice of putting down protest based on disagreement may have been believed to have been directed against the spirit of rebellion, but any legislation that supported the action was viewed as sectarian insofar as it had violated the promotion of respect for the law by other legal religions. 

This was not in the Spirit of the promise of salvation as offered by the sacrifice of Christ on the cross. The sacrifice was made once for all time. Scripture states that the Messiah came to set the captives free. He was to help the blind to see, the lame to walk and the poor to rejoice in the promise as a liberation in the pursuit of happiness in the struggle against hardship.

The restoration of Jerusalem in the state of Israel is seen as a sanctification of legal religion by law.

Isa. 61:10-62:3

I will greatly rejoice in the LORD,
my whole being shall exult in my God.
He has clothed me with the garments of salvation.
He has covered me with the robe of righteousness
as a bridegroom decks himself with a garland
and as a bride adorns herself with her jewels.

For Zion's sake I will not keep silent.
For Jerusalem's sake I will not rest
until her vindication shines out like the dawn
and her salvation like a burning torch.

The nations shall see your vindication
and all the kings your glory
and you shall be called by a new name
that the mouth of the LORD will give.
You shall be a crown of beauty in the hand of the LORD
and a royal diadem in the hand of your God.

----------------------------

Jerusalem is a jewel in the land of promise.
The bride is adorned with the sparkle of solace.

The nations see glory in the vindication of your existence.
Exculpation exonerates the confirmation of faithful persistence.

=================

Justified by Faith


Galatia was located in Asia Minor or present day Turkey. A number of Celtic Gauls had migrated to the area.

The Galatians were a Gallic (Celtic) people of the Hellenistic period that dwelt mainly in the north central regions of Asia Minor or Anatolia in what was known as Galatia. They were a part of the great migration led by Brennus.

Brennus invaded Greece in 281 BC with a huge war band and was turned back before he could plunder the temple of Apollo at Delphi. Another group had split off from Brennus. They had migrated into Thrace under their leaders Leonnorius and Lutarius. These invaders appeared in Asia Minor in 278–277 BC

Leonnorios led the invasion into the area. The invaders had been invaded by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to help in a dynastic struggle against his brother. Three tribes crossed over from Thrace to Asia Minor.

Their skin was fair. Their hair was red. They spoke a different language. They were eventually defeated by the Seleucid King Antiochus I in a battle where the Seleucid war elephants shocked the Celts. While the momentum of the invasion was broken, the Galatians were by no means exterminated.

The migration led to the establishment of a long-lived Galatian territory in central Anatolia, which included the eastern part of ancient Phrygia that became known as Galatia.

They stayed through the Greek and Roman occupations.

The constitution of the Galatian state is described by Strabo. Each tribe was divided into cantons conformably to custom.

Each was governed by a tetrarch with a judge under him whose powers were unlimited except in cases of murder. Murders were tried before a council of 300 drawn from the twelve cantons who met at a holy place 20 miles south-west of Ancyra.

 It is likely it was a sacred oak grove since the name means 'sanctuary of the oaks' in Gaulish.
The local population of Cappadocians were left in control of the towns and most of the land. They paid tithes to their new overlords who formed a military aristocracy. These nobles kept aloof in fortified farmsteads surrounded by their bands.

These Galatians were warriors. They were respected by Greeks and Romans. They were often hired as mercenaries. Sometimes they fought on both sides in the great battles of the times.

Rome sent Gnaeus Manlius Vulso on an expedition against the Galatians in 189 BCE. The Romans won the Galatian War. Galatia was dominated by Rome until it became a client state in 64.

The old constitution disappeared. Three chiefs were appointed as tetrarchs. One led each tribe. This arrangement soon gave way before the ambition of one of these tetrarchs, Deiotarus. He was the contemporary of Cicero and Julius Caesar. He made himself master of the other two tetrarchies and was finally recognized by the Romans as 'king' of Galatia.

A number of Galatians of the Roman Empire were evangelized by Paul the Apostle's missionary activities in the first century CE.  The Acts of the Apostles recorded that Paul traveled to the "region of Galatia and Phrygia." Phrygia was immediately west of Galatia.

Judaizers were Christians who taught that it was necessary to adopt Jewish customs and practices found in the Law of Moses to be saved. This meant that Gentile converts had to be circumcized even as adults.

The epistle to the Galatians presents the argument against the Judaizers.

Paul's letter is addressed "to the churches of Galatia" (Gal. 1:2). The New Testament says that the churches of Galatia (Antioch of Pisidia, Iconium, Lystra and Derbe) were founded by Paul himself (Acts 16:6; Gal.1:6;4:13;4:19). They seem to have been composed mainly of gentile converts (Gal. 4:8).

The churches were led astray from Paul's faith centered teaching after his departure by individuals proposing "another gospel." The different instruction was centered on salvation through the Mosaic law. It was called legalism.

The Galatians appear to have been receptive to the teaching of these newcomers. The epistle is Paul's response to what he sees as their willingness to turn from his doctrine.

There is a political implication that the status of the emperor and the imperial succession by family inheritance or adoption represented a liberation from the law by Christ. Cyrus, an Achaemenid ruler, had been identified as the 'Messiah' by the Hebrew scriptures.

This foreign ruler was considered to be the political extension of the promise of royal succession to the house of David. Circumcision was not a religious rite that was practiced by the Greeks or the Romans.

Paul argued against circumcision as an unnecessary external rite of the religion that wasn't warranted by the promise in the vision revealed to Abraham that he would be the father of nations.

Abraham would become the father by virtue of his faith, not his observance of religious custom. Circumcision was compared to animal sacrifice as something that might have been on the way to obscurity.

Galatians 3:24-25, 4:4-7

We were imprisoned and guarded under the law until faith would be revealed. The law was our disciplinarian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith.

When the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of woman, born under law in order to redeem those who were under the law that we might receive adoption as children.

God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts because we are children, crying, 'Abba! Father!' You are no longer a slave but a child. If a child then an heir through God.'

-----------------------

Christ came that we might be justified by faith.
The Son was born of woman under the law as great.

The Spirit of the Son has been sent into our hearts
because we are children who cry to the Father for our part.

You are no longer a slave but a child.
As a child you are an heir reconciled.

=================

Expectation

Heraclitus of Ephesus
b. 535 BCE  Ephesus, Ionia, Persian Empire
d. 475 BCE  Ephesus, Ionia, Delian League

Heraclitus was a Pre-Socratic philosopher from Ionia. He was a native of Ephesus when it was in the Persian Empire.  Kusadasi,Turkey is located where Ephesus had been.

He is known for his doctrine of universal flux. He taught that things are in a constant state of change. Opposites are joined in unity when the abstract definition of concepts doesn't agree with physical reality. Certainty in expectation can be destroyed in the face of disaster or unexpected fortune.

Fire is the essential material element for the world. The universal flux existed in the Word or the Logos, the Reason for change.

Ephesus was a prominent city in Ionia, the Greek-inhabited coast of Asia Minor. He inherited the honorific title for the office of “king” of the Ionians according to one account. He resigned this to his brother. He is generally considered to have favored aristocratic government over democracy based on his political observations.

Ephesus was close to Miletus. This was the city where the first thinkers recognized in later tradition as philosophers lived. There is no record of his having made the acquaintance of any of the Milesian thinkers, Thales, Anaximander or Anaximenes. It is not known that he was taught by them. There is no testimony that he had traveled.

He is said to have written a single papyrus roll). The scroll was reputed to have been deposited in the great temple of Artemis at Ephesus. The story is plausible. Temples often served as depositories for money and other valuables. No libraries are known from the time of Heraclitus in the city.

The fragments that still exist indicate that his book looked more like a collection of proverbs such as were ascribed to the seven sages than like a cosmological treatise of the Milesians.

Theophrastus said that it seemed only half-finished. It was a kind of hodgepodge he attributed to the author’s melancholy.  Diogenes Laertius reported that the work was divided into three sections, one on cosmology, one on politics (and ethics) and one on theology (9.5–6).

All these topics are treated in the extant fragments but it is often difficult to see what boundaries the work might have drawn between them since Heraclitus seems to have seen deep interconnections between science, human affairs and theology.

His logic denied the law of non-contradiction.

His work was structured in contrast to the Greek tradition of philosophy as influenced by the epic poets Homer and Hesiod, the poet and philosopher Xenophanes, the historian and antiquarian Hecataeus, the religious mathematician Pythagoras, the sage Bias of Priene, the poet Archilochus and the Milesian philosophers.

Heraclitus’ most fundamental departure from previous philosophy can be seen in his emphasis on human affairs. While he continued many of the physical and cosmological theories of his predecessors, he shifted his focus from the cosmic to the human realm.

Heraclitus stressed that the message of the Word was not his own invention. It was a timeless truth available to any who attended to the way the world itself is.

Blindness in comprehension was one of his main themes. While all things occurred according to Reason, humans were inexperienced in the experience of events with words. He promised to describe each thing according to its nature to show how it is, but he couldn't guarantee that the description would be understood.

He described the nature of the Word as eternal. It exists. It always existed. It will last forever, but the comprehension of it exceeds the general ability to recognize it.

Opposites are necessary for life, but they are unified in a system of balanced exchange. The world itself consists of a law-like interchange of elements symbolized by fire. The world is not to be identified with any particular substance, but rather with an ongoing process governed by a law of change.

John is the 4th of the canonical gospels. The book was completed around 90-110 CE. It is anonymous, but it is ascribed to the disciple whom Jesus loved. It shares style and content with the 3 Johannine epistles. It is included with the book of Revelations as Johannine, but not from the same author.

The discourses contained in this gospel seem to be concerned with issues of the church–synagogue debate at the time of composition. The community appears to define itself primarily in contrast to Judaism, rather than as part of a wider Christian society. It presents a perspective that is 'in the world' but not fully of it.

Religion was presented as a forum for the monotheistic form rather than for a particular body of people. It managed to suggest the capacity for the integration of the Greek, Roman, Judaic and Persian worlds.

The author knew some version of Mark and possibly Luke. He shared with them some items of vocabulary and clusters of incidents arranged in the same order.

Key terms from the synoptics are absent or nearly so. The author felt free to write independently of the synoptic texts. The wedding in Cana, the encounter of Jesus with the Samaritan woman at the well and the raising of Lazarus, are not paralleled in the other gospels.

The author drew these from an independent source called the "signs gospel". The speeches of Jesus came from a second "discourse" source. The prologue was drawn from an early hymn.

The phrase "the Word" refers to Jesus as indicated in other verses later in the same chapter. This verse and others throughout Johannine literature connect the Christian understanding of Jesus to the philosophical idea of the Logos and the Hebrew Wisdom literature.

John 1:1-6

The Word was with God in the beginning and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through him. Not one thing came into being without him. What has come into being in him was life. The life was the light for all people. The light shines in the darkness. The darkness did not overcome it.

There was a man sent from God whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify to the light so all might believe through him. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to that which was coming into the world which enlightens everyone.

-----------------------

The Word was in the beginning with God.
All things came into being by reason with odds.

Life has come into being through chance in the law.
Action against the law is wrong
unless the expression is fatally flawed.

The light shines in darkness.
The darkness did not overcome the harness.

There was a man sent to baptize with water.
John was sent to cleanse and testify against slaughter.

He was not the life of the Light for the world
but he testified for the Word as a flag unfurled.

The Word came as Jesus to baptize with fire
to reconcile worlds as the controversial pacifier.

Logic with metaphor is a powerful tool
for the communication of ideas in the rule
of the schools for trade based on fuel and the jewel.

=================

Private Property


Plato was against an economy based on private property.

"....no one will posses any private property, except for what's entirely necessary." (Republic,416d)

This statement in Plato's Republic was a precursor to more modern ideas such as communism and socialism. "Utopian" ideas like Plato's are suspicious because they point to a totalitarian society as inevitable. What's the difference  between a utopian society like the one in Plato's Republic and the dystopian model presented in, Brave New World or 1984?

Aristotle argued for the private ownership of property as the basis for economics.
Aristotle on private-property and money

Aristotle delivered a cogent attack on the communal ownership of property by the ruling class called for by Plato. Plato's goal of the perfect unity of the state through communism was denounced by pointing out that such extreme unity runs against the diversity of mankind.

It's against the reciprocal advantage that everyone reaps through market exchange.

Aristotle delivered a point-by-point contrast of private as against communal property. Private property is more productive. It will lead to progress.

Goods owned in common by a large number of people will receive little attention. People will mainly consult their own self-interest and will neglect duty when they can leave it to others. People devote the greatest interest and care to their own property by contrast.

One of Plato's arguments for communism is that it is conducive to social peace. No one will be envious. They will not try to grab the property that belongs to all.

Aristotle retorted that communal property leads to continual and intense conflict. Each will complain that he has worked harder and obtained less than others who have done little and taken more from the common store.

They took more because they didn't spend as much time working for what was held in common. They took the time to take as much as they could for as little work as possible.

Not all crimes or revolutions are powered by economic motives. Men do not become tyrants to suffer coldness and deprivation. .

------------------------

Martyrdom


Thomas Beckett
b.  12.21.1119  Cheapside, London, England
d.  12.29.1170  Canterbury Cathedral, Kent, England

Thomas Becket was the son of a merchant who rose to power during the reign of Henry II. The two became friends before Henry was crowned king.

King Henry I had  sent his son to live in Becket's household. It was the custom for noble children to be fostered out to other noble houses.

Thomas and Henry grew up in the same house. They hunted and played chess together.  The two men grew to share one heart and mind.

Thomas didn't pursue higher education, so he was resigned to work as a lower order cleric. He worked for Theobald, the Archbishop of Canterbury, as a liason to Rome. He recommended that Anselm of Canterbury be canonized as a saint.

Theobald  sent him to Bologna and Auxerre to study canon law. He named Becket Archdeacon of Canterbury in 1154.

Other ecclesiastical offices included a number of benefices, prebends at Lincoln Cathedral and St Paul's Cathedral and the office of Provost of Beverley.

His efficiency in those posts led Theobald to recommend him to King Henry II for the vacant post of Lord Chancellor. Becket was appointed in January 1155.

When Theobald died in 1161 Henry selected Becket to replace him as the Archbishop. He was hoping to draw a line for authority in the investiture controversy.

The argument concerned who should invest a new bishop with his staff and ring. This had been carried out by the King in a symbolic demonstration of royal power, but Pope Urban II had changed the practice in 1099. He argued that only the papacy had the authority for the task. Clergy should not pay homage to their local temporal rulers.

This judgment caused friction between Archbishop Anselm and King William when Anselm agreed with the pope. Anselm went into exile.

Henry I succeeded William. He gave up his right to invest his clergy, but retained the custom of requiring them to do homage for the temporalities, the landed properties they held in England.

Henry II held that the English custom was to allow secular courts to try lower order clerics accused of crimes. Becket took the position that all clergy, whether only in minor orders or not, were not to be dealt with by secular powers. Only the ecclesiastical hierarchy could judge the accusation of crime.

Thomas Becket was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1162 until his murder in 1170. He engaged in the controversy with King Henry II from 1163 to 1170. The report of his murder tabled the decision regarding royal authority.

BBC History: Thomas Becket
wiki Thomas Becket

--------------------


The Bible

John Jay wrote only 7 of the Federalist Papers, but he developed the case for international relations with foreign powers for national security.

The third paper was the second of four essays by Jay on the utility of the Union in protecting Americans against foreign aggression. He had earlier acted as ambassador to Spain and Secretary for Foreign Affairs. This experience contributed to his focus on international relations.

Jay was a member of the Church of England prior to the American Revolution. He joined the Protestant Episcopal Church in America after independence. He had been a warden of Trinity Church, New York since 1785.

Jay served as vice-president (1816-21) and president (1821-27) of the American Bible Society. He believed that the most effective way of ensuring world peace was through propagation of the Christian gospel.

He argued that real Christians will abstain from violating the rights of others in a letter addressed to Pennsylvania House of Representatives member John Murray dated October 12, 1816.  Those who abstain from such a thing will not provoke war.

Most nations had peace or war at the will of rulers whom they did not elect.  Monarchs were not always wise or virtuous. Catholics lacked respect for national security. Republic had to be defined in a way that was strong enough for the life of the nation.

Providence gave people the choice of their rulers. It is the duty, privilege and interest of a Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers. The moral precepts of Christianity were necessary for good government.

No human society had ever been able to maintain both order and freedom with cohesiveness and liberty without moral precepts. Should our Republic ever forget that the fundamental principles for law in our society were drawn from the Bible, the results would be harmful.

Federalist Papers #3
Text

Jay argued that the people of America had entertained the importance of one government vested with sufficient power for all general purposes for a long time in the third Federalist Paper.

Unity for royal sovereignty was a part of western history from the inception of the Christian religion in the holy Roman empire.

The pope blessed each king to select his political and religious officials until Urban II changed the policy in 1099. The change in policy adversely affected the national part of security in each kingdom.

The safety of the nation affords great significance to those who wish to define it precisely and comprehensively to meet the needs of defense from threat caused by a variety of circumstances and considerations.

Security is for the preservation of peace and tranquility against dangers from foreign arms and influence as well as from instability of like kind arising from domestic causes. A cordial union under an efficient national government affords the best security that can be devised against hostility from abroad.

The number of wars which had happened will be found to be in proportion to the number and weight of the causes which provoked or invited them whether real or pretended. What would be the number of causes for war for a united America? Would there not be more for a disunited nation?

Should it turn out that the United America will give the fewest, then it will follow that the union tends most to preserve the people in a state of peace with other nations.

The cause of war arose either from the violation of treaties or from direct violence. America had already formed treaties with no less than six foreign nations.

All of them were maritime except for the agreement with Prussia. The maritime nations were able to cause injury and harassment.

The confederation had also had extensive commerce with Portugal, Spain and Britain. The two latter kingdoms had the circumstance of neighborhood to attend as well.

Once an efficient national government was established, the best people in the country would not only consent to serve, but would also be appointed to manage it.

Although town, country or other contracted influence may have placed officials in assemblies, senates, courts of justice or executive departments, yet more general and extensive reputation for talents and other qualifications are necessary to recommend the qualified to offices in the national government.

This level has the widest field for choice and an overview with respect for law. It would not experience that want of proper persons which was evident in some of the states.

The administration, the political counsel and the judicial decisions will be more systematic and judicious than those of individual states.

Relations with other nations will be more satisfactory and safe.

Treaties, the articles for treaties and the laws of nations will be expounded in one sense and executed in the same manner.

Adjudications on the same points and questions in different states or in more than one confederation would not always be in accord or be consistent.

The wisdom of the convention in committing such questions to the jurisdiction and judgment of courts appointed by and responsible to one national government was to be commended.

The prospect of loss or advantage may tempt the governing party in one or two States to swerve from good faith and justice.

Those temptations will have little or no influence on the national government. That which swayed some states will be fruitless on the greater part of the union. Good faith and justice will be preserved. The treaty of peace with Britain added weight to this reason.

The national government would not be affected by the local circumstance even if there were to be those who should fall to such temptations that result from circumstances peculiar to the state despite the disposition to oppose the fall by the governing party.

They will neither be induced to commit the wrong themselves nor want for power or inclination to prevent or punish its commission by others.

So far as either designed or accidental violations of treaties or the laws of nations afford the  cause of war, they are less to be apprehended under one general government than under several lesser ones. The larger union favors the safety of the people most.

One good government affords more security against dangers from war caused by direct and unlawful violence.

Not a single Indian war had been occasioned by aggression from the federal government. There were instances of Indian hostilities having been provoked by the improper conduct of individual states.

Spanish and British territories bordered on some states and not on others. The cause of quarrel was more immediately confined to the border states. The impulse of sudden irritation induced by a quick sense of apparent interest or injury was most likely to excite war with these nations by direct violence.

A national government is more effective in the mediation of settlement or the amicable resolution of disputes. The pride of states disposed them to justify all their actions and to oppose the acknowledgement, correction or repair of error or offense.

The national view of such cases is not affected by this pride. Moderation and candor consider the means most proper for extrication from difficulties.

The state of Genoa endeavored to appease Louis XIV in 1685. He demanded that they should send their chief magistrate with four of their senators to France to ask his pardon and receive his terms.

They were obliged to submit to his demands for the sake of peace. Would he on any occasion either have demanded or have received like humiliation from Spain, Britain or any other powerful nation?

A strong united nation is not asked to submit to the condition of humiliation.

The condition of the world has changed since the time that Jay offered his argument, but the benefit of national security is still a primary concern for the union. The borders still define the greatest area of concern for the safety of the country.

International relations are best handled at the national level. Trade can be negotiated with respect for the protection of transportation for people and products.

----------------------

Induction


Plato had described the Athenian model for democratic monarchy as insufficient for Greek security. He felt that the Spartan form was more beneficial for the perpetuation of the culture.

His description of love in the Phaedrus conveyed the impression that sexual relations for love were homosexual. The agreement in sexual congress was viewed as a political component that was added to marriage. Whether the relations were for passionate (Bacchanalian) or dispassionate (Apollonian) love the purpose was to establish dominance for dictatorship.

The military emphasis in the dual kingship of the Spartans was seen as adequate for defense against the Persian threat. The idealism of the ideal forms would allow for the development of a confederation of kingdoms for the variable consideration of custom and practice with the Greek language.

Aristotle presented a metaphysical view that was competitive with the Persian empire. His dialectical method allowed for the formation of opinion based on the consideration of various views. His unmoved Mover suggested a level of dispassion in judgment that could rule an empire.

The imperial story line regarding the solicitation of alliance with the threat of genocide or slavery presented a real world dilemma with respect for detachment from the world.

While slavery might conceivably have been used to work slaves into the status of serfs or freedmen, it might also have been used to perpetuate cruelty in punishment or violence in aggression for the sake of private property.

Alexander established a pattern of leadership that insisted on libraries for the collection of documentation of written material and administrators who would organize a system of election for political officials. His acceptance of status as a deity after he defeated the Persians may have been a concession to slavery as a part of imperial government.

If he knew about the Jewish ascription of the title of Messiah to Cyrus as the liberator of the captives, he left the decision regarding the practice open to question with the ambiguity of the definition of what was 'best.'

The Romans adapted the Greek model to an idea of republic that organized public sentiment with religious festival and a system of election. They didn't have gymnasiums for public education, but they used gladiatorial contests and enslavement as the means to reduce the savage threat from barbarian tribes.

The Greek phalanx was adopted as the standard form for military conflicts with the military force from other kingdoms or empires. The emperor was seen as a necessary evil to fight other empires. This said, a line of succession that included adoption as an option was instituted for the perpetuation of the culture.

Octavian countered the notion of homosexuality as necessary for love in political relations with the recognition of the importance of the family as the dominant social influence for political and religious organization.

Justin Martyr countered the notion that the monotheism of Christians was detrimental to the Roman empire with the proposal that homosexuality was unnatural. It encouraged an artificial consensus of women with women and men with men. Either consensus wasn't as good for the public as something that was for the benefit of both.

Monasticism was developed as a social form in religion for those who didn't feel that marriage would work. Productivity with the organized independence of the unmarried was established as beneficial for the public. The education that had been limited to the aristocracy was made available to more people of both sexes.

Monasticism was not supported by the Protestant Reformation. Marriage came to be viewed as the only acceptable order for the management of private property.

The unmarried came to be labeled as homosexual by the common judgment advocated by those with less educational requirement in government. Those who were unmarried and no longer had the option of monasticism as a social form would accept the label if they didn't feel that marriage would work for them.

C.D. Broad was unmarried. He exercised his option to get higher education. He elected to study the work of Aristotle. He chose to evaluate the problem of selection in relation to precedent. His proposal was that a precedent should be allowed to stand unless it could be replaced by something as good or better.

This presented a difficulty to the the consideration of heterosexual and homosexual relations in marriage. The issue was complicated by another degree for those who didn't find a partner who could cooperate for the successful management of the household as an element in the private ownership of property.

It would be senseless to argue that homosexual marriage has to be the dominant form for the public. Such a society would be doomed to failure by attrition. The life and work of C.D. Broad helped to develop an alternative argument.   

C.D. Broad
b. 12.30.1887 Harlesdon, London, United Kingdom
d. 3.11.1971 Cambridge, United Kingdom

Unmarried

Homosexuality was declared a mental illness in the NY Times article in 1963.

NY Times Article on the growth of homosexuality in the city in 1963
NY Times Article: Homosexuality

Another article from 2018 expresses the ABC's about the Lesbian Gay Alliance.

ABC's
NY Times Article: Gender Language

"Take, for example, the addition of “Q” that became increasingly popular as the 20th century turned into the 21st. Some insisted this stood for “questioning,” representing people who were uncertain of their sexual orientations or gender identities. Others declared it was for “queer,” a catchall term that has shed its derogatory origins and is gaining acceptance."

Family organization is regarded as important in monarchy and republic. Marriage is treated as a political tool for growth in status or as a defense against attack for being unmarried.

Monasteries used to act as a haven for the unmarried. The Roman Catholic Church adopted a celibate priesthood, because the monastic community had become so powerful that they felt that more could be accomplished by a single than a married person.

The Buddhist religion has never had a married priesthood. The monks are unmarried or they cease to be monks.

The Roman Empire adopted a stance against homosexuality over a century after Octavian had sought to make marriage and family values the pillar for society.

The Republic had made politics a subordinate order to the development of business organization as a family interest. This didn't stop or decrease war, but there is always that thought that business could exist or even thrive without military conquest if the world were to value free and fair trade as the international practice.

Justin the Martyr had something to do with making homosexuality an immoral offense against society. He wrote an argument to the emperor that recommended that he persecute homosexuals instead of Christians.

C.D. Broad

Charlie Dunbar Broad was an English historian of philosophy and philosopher of moral science.

Broad's essay on "Determinism, Indeterminism, and Libertarianism" in Ethics and the History of Philosophy (1952) introduced the philosophical terms "occurrent causation" and "non-occurrent causation". These terms became the basis for the contemporary distinction between "agent-causal" and "event-causal" in debates on libertarian free will.

He was born in London in the latter part of the 19th century.

Harlesden, Middlesex

Harlesden is an area in northwest London. Its main focal point is the Jubilee Clock which commemorates Queen Victoria's Golden Jubilee.

It was  a rural village in the 19th century. It began to develop some of its urban appearance with the arrival of the railways. Willesden Junction, Kensal Green and Harlesden stations all had an effect on the developing village. Cottages for railway and industrial workers were built. Housing for the local middle class was developed as well.

Harlesden lost it s rural nature as factories replaced  farms and woodland.

London grew to be a global city of immense importance as the capital for the British Empire. The growth was fed by immigrants from the colonies and refugees from conflicts and famines.

It was the largest city in the world from about 1825, the world's largest port and the heart of international finance and trade.

Railways connecting London to the rest of Britain, as well as the London Underground was built. Roads, a modern sewer system and many famous sites were constructed.

CD Broad

Charlie Dunbar Broad was born in Harlesden on 30 December 1887.

He was educated at Dulwich College from 1900 until 1906. He gained a scholarship to study at Trinity College, Cambridge in 1906. He graduated with First-Class Honours in 1910.

Broad’s early interests were in science and mathematics. He came to believe that he would never be a first-rate scientist despite being successful in these. He turned to philosophy.

Broad’s interests were exceptionally wide in range. He devoted his philosophical acuity to the mind-body problem, the nature of perception, memory, introspection, the unconscious and to the nature of space, time and causation. He also wrote extensively on the philosophy of probability and induction, ethics, the history of philosophy and the philosophy of religion.

He became a Fellow of Trinity College in 1911. This was a non-residential position. The position enabled him to also accept an opening he had applied for as an assistant lecturer at St Andrews University.

He was later made a lecturer at St Andrews University. He remained there until 1920. He was appointed professor at Bristol University in 1920. He worked there until 1923 when he returned to Trinity College as a College lecturer.

He was a lecturer in 'moral science' in the Faculty of philosophy at Cambridge University from 1926 until 1931. He was appointed 'Sidgwick Lecturer' at Cambridge University in 1931. He kept this role until 1933 when he was appointed Knightbridge Professor of Moral Philosophy at Cambridge University. He held the position until 1953.

He became known for his thorough and dispassionate examinations of arguments in such works as Scientific Thought (1923), The Mind and Its Place in Nature (1925) and Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy (2 vols., 1933-1938).

----------------------

Charlie Dunbar Broad was an unmarried academic during a time when homosexual acts were designated as illegal by legislated law. He has been described as "openly gay", but this could be because he authored a letter to The Times that requested that the law against homosexual acts be rescinded.

The letter was co-signed by A.J. Ayer, Bertrand Russell and 28 others. It cited the Wolfenden's Report as a reference that recommended that homosexuality no longer be regarded as a criminal offense.

I couldn't find a quote by Broad wherein he declared himself homosexual. I recalled reading a statement by Russell that a bachelor is an unmarried man however.

Whether he was gay or not, there was the distinct possibility that an unmarried person might be accused and convicted for homosexual acts due to the false conviction that being unmarried must mean that the person is homosexual.

Gay marriage has a value to society insofar as it doesn't reproduce offspring. It is reasonable to assume that many heterosexual marriages stop reproductive action after some offspring have been produced.

The married couple then precedes to act as parents who have interdependent or independent agendas with regard to providing a service or product for the market.

There are grounds to argue that a homosexual partnership should be blessed rather than sanctified as a marriage. A blessed union wouldn't have the lifelong obligation that a marriage has.

If the partners find that they can't cooperate productively in a lifelong contract, they can seek an alternative arrangement. They don't have the responsibility to provide for offspring.

This said, divorce is an option for those who feel that marriage isn't productive. Homosexual marriage has been deemed legal by the US Supreme Court. Many states legalized the marriage immediately thanks in no small part to the LGBT alliance as a political lobby.

I have found that being single has allowed for productivity in my written work. I don't have to struggle with the obligation of making sure that my marital partner is happy before I attempt to produce a product of my own.

I have to take care of my responsibilities without the help of a marital partner, but I didn't want to make an issue out of making my partner make be happy before she or he got to do independent activities.

I don't agree that the Anglican Communion should have favored opposition to gay marriage. I know that they are a world wide organization, but Great Britain has blessed unions for homosexual couples. The Episcopal Church of America was suspended for 3 years from the AC.

They seem to be showing favor for the Ugandan contingency that wanted to legislate the death penalty as a punishment for homosexuality. Concession to legislation of that sort strikes me as church compliance with government overreach in the extension of the claim to power over people.

I am hopeful that the radical opposition to homosexuality will be regarded as that which should result in suspension. Let the matter drop otherwise. The legality of marriage is a political issue. The sanctification or blessing of the union is a religious matter. Any support for the death penalty or treating the action as criminal should be regarded as extreme.

It is not the business of the state or the church to require heterosexual marriage as the only choice for legal adults.

Charlie Broad
S. 查尔斯·布罗德
T. 查爾斯·布羅德

查 Cha   to examine               查           no kanji        Cha   ちゃ-  チャ-         Chal 찰  the             
尔  er      you                          爾  ji       you                ri        り-        リ-          li      리  lee
斯  si       this                          斯  shi    this                Bu     ぶ          ブ           Beu  브  bro     
布  Bu     to announce            布   fu     cloth              ro      ろ-        ロ-           lo     로  in                   
罗  luo    to catch                    羅   ra      gauze           do     ど           ド           deu   드  de       
德  de      morality                  德   toku  ethics                                         

------------------------

The appearance of an event doesn't always show an agent as the cause.
Even the roll of the dice was supposed to be an accidental element to what the outcome was.

=================
-----------------------

Border Security


Immigrants are expected to cross into the country at established checkpoints so security personnel can check documentation regarding the citizen's records.

Those who have a criminal record are considered to be a greater security risk. Migrant workers and those with temporary visas are expected to report the address to their residency while in the country.

Liberal Dems want to allow those who didn't cross at checkpoints to be granted the rights of citizens without the path to citizenship. There is no educational requirement for that 'plan.'

The undocumented immigrant doesn't have to understand the language to vote. They don't have to understand the language find employment. They just need someone who will translate for them. They don't have to understand the language to receive services when appointed a translator.

They don't have to work to get paid in the liberal system, because the liberal politician is going to have the American taxpayer do the work and pay for the undocumented immigrant. The liberals are using this system to establish democratic dictatorship.

It's not constitutional. It's not republican. It's rule by demand from the ignorant and belligerent that weakens the constituent rights for the citizens of the country.

Do liberals blame the socialism in the US on China? Education makes the difference in the meritocracy of employment. When people with less education are hired over those with education and experience because it was unfair that the educated learned from 'books', the meritocracy is replaced with a system that meets worker demands from employees who didn't bother to get an education.

The Chinese have a civil service test that most people pass only with education. Articles about Chinese government however define the economy as socialist and the democracy as a dictatorship. Is their law too well defined? Are they too busy using the expertise of the uneducated for the authority of the government official?

Core Interests
NY Times Article: China's Core Interests

Note how the NY Times article defines the concept of "core interests."

"With the national security law, it has become even clearer that the term refers to what Chinese leaders see as three sacrosanct rights of the nation: maintaining the political system, with unquestioned rule by the Communist Party; defending sovereignty claims and territorial integrity; and economic development."

The national security law passed in 2015 had been a cause of controversy in Hong Kong and Macau. It is conceivable that Hong Kong and Macau have more democratic dictatorship than Beijing. What does that do to the NY Times definition of the problem?

Security


Look at the different translations of the national security law for China (2015).

China's National Defense
Text

" It is the aspiration of the Chinese government and people to lead a peaceful, stable and prosperous world into the new century...

Article 2

"The Chinese government firmly pursues a national defense policy that is defensive in nature. The Constitution of the People's Republic of China (PRC) clearly specifies the tasks of the armed forces of the PRC as being to consolidate national defense, resist aggression, defend the motherland, safeguard the people's peaceful labor, participate in national construction and strive to serve the people. China's state interests, social system, foreign policy and historical and cultural traditions postulate that China will inevitably adopt such a national defense policy."

National Security Law
Text

"Article 1 To maintain national security, safeguard the regime of people's democratic dictatorship and the socialist system with Chinese characteristics, protect the fundamental interest of the people, ensure the smooth advancement of reform, opening up, and socialist modernization, and achieve the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, this Law is developed in accordance with the Constitution."

The second translation is rife with catch phrases that make the western reader think that 'those Chinese are still communists.' It skipped the first article and translated the second with the terms "regime", "dictatorship" and "socialist."

The first demonstrates a concern for international relations that is consistent with the current president's proposal for international cooperation. The national law is an expression of respect for international relations.

--------------------

When the draft was removed as the justification for service in the US military, enlistment became voluntary. Recruiters used incentive to attract enlistees.

This made the use of the military for national security a matter of choice.

This has considerable impact regarding the investment in the budget for national security with respect for the military. A small increase in expenditure was warranted for college loans.

Material support for electronics, equipment and barracks improvements was added.

Legislation for the existence of the military for national security will decrease the amount of fake news used to justify the existence of the armed forces as a legal entity.

Budgetary modifications could be adjusted for real world events and conditions. The importance of fictional stories would be decreased with respect for the defense of the country. 

Military leadership has a strong tradition in the quality of education established at West Point, Annapolis and Colorado Springs.

The military support for constitutional law makes the service honorable. It is not there to enforce dictatorship.

Against Torture


C.S. Lewis
Finding Shakespeare Video

Communism was a primitive economic form for republic. The concept of private property allows each a portion of providence. Unity in agreement with the objectivity of goodness provides elasticity to the portion that results from the provision of a service.

C.S. Lewis provided a modern view for the value of theism in the search for truth in God with the classical perspective. Truth is most relevant in context. The argument for monotheism moves the cultural context for the value of religion forward from that which is too restrictive about polytheism.

This produces a value when civilization doesn't act as the larger savage.  Cruelty in punishment and violence in aggression cost the public too much to warrant savage policy in practice.

The state of the nation needs a well trained military for defense against hostile threats, real or pretended. Pretend threats serve a purpose when used to prepare for defense against anything real.

Those cultivated fictions which journalism has presented to the public have produced a benefit for national security with respect for the defense of trade. International trade has taken the scope for military protection outside of the designated boundaries for the country.

There is that which is right for the military acting as a police force against actions like terrorism provided that there is instruction given in the customs and language for the theater for operations.

Such instruction helps the people in the military act in a way that is well informed, so they don't create larger problems than those they help to solve.