Showing posts with label maturity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label maturity. Show all posts

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Order

1.26.20


Rosamund Pike


Order
Thought
订单思想
Dìngdān sīxiǎng
注文思考
Chūmon shikō
ps119.97+
Ordinis thought

The Father spoke the elements with material elation.
The Word put them together in the act of creation.

Logic is drawn from language with the art of reason.
It is the means of expression for the particular season.

What is the name for this season now?
Winter shivers when cold is sensibly endowed.

The art of division separates thought 
from emotions that have nought.

Animals are prompted to action by impulse with instinct.
A person is directed to act by judgement that isn't too instant.

Self-preservation is common to both
but the human entertains production for economic growth.

How I love 
the sight of the dove!

The flight in the light 
represents spiritual delight.

When darkness had threatened the memory of the past
the wings of the dove signaled remembrance of strength that will last.

Water is necessary to drink, cook and clean.
It is essentially good for health and hygiene.

Various arts are devoted to the performance of action
with the order of readiness to display interaction.

Entertainment produces action for a desirable effect
to impress the audience with the desired intent.

Art has procedure established by reason.
Happiness varies with time in the season.

How I love law for constancy and variance.
It is constant against acts that damage in variants.
It allows for variance in empirical experience.

Reason directs action from the lower powers
but it also reflects on itself with respect for the hour.

Logic and grammar form the base for rhetoric.
These are the elements of thought that reverence relevance.

The order of letters identify the word as a unit.
Spelling precedes grammar in language that is human.

The art of production enables the performance of manual acts
in the easiest way that thought can enact.

Reason had reasoned about manual acts
to create a product that expresses consensual craft.

Art is necessary to direct the act of apprehension
so the action can gain traction for production by selection.

Logic is the name for the craft in this art.
The order of thought communicates ideas at least in part. 

The order of nature is a concern in this craft.
It is design that produces duty that isn't just a fast draft cast to last.

Reflection on the commandments made me wiser for what's true 
than I would have been had I not used the law as a cipher for the newly renewed.

That which was savage in the expression of the elements 
had 'made' me act in a way that wasn't civil or relevant.

My enemies work to push me back to that state
that often enough sounded like an expression of hate.

Logic is an art in the science of reason.
It is ordered for meaning in the action needed.

It was a beacon of light 
when darkness darkened sight.



This darkness was rebellion against authority
whether it came from the majority or minority.


The land of Zebulun and Naphtali had fallen into contempt
but from this curse they would ascend.

Each home struggled with the call to unity
in defense of tribal land as part of a larger community.

They had allied with a planned rebellion
that turned the land into a dwelling place for hellions.

Darkness had obscured faith in the Light
as the means by which people came to sight.

The best end was hidden by the brightness.
It could be discerned by diligent forthrightness.

They rejoice before you as with the joy of harvest
but by your faith you will reach the farthest.


Rod of Asclepius

Reason is structured to communicate ideas on design
when these fix agreement like the rod of Asclepius divined.

Logic is the art of arts
that directs production from any start.

The parts of diversity are ordered for unity
to guide the union to organize community.

The first act of reason is the recognition of the unit.
A thing exists as it is and is as illumined. 
Recognition of the unit is like song is to music.

The thing that exists is represented by an idea in the memory.
The representation is a reflection of a fact that is sensory.

The second operation is combination or division.
Truth or falsity are present in the interpretation of the mission
for the admission of what is right about this vision.

Subtraction is the reverse of addition.
Multiplication is the inverse of division.

I have more understanding of knowledge than the vitriol from my haters
because the acts of reason lift me above the insults from those anti-negotiators.

I can move from one thing to another grown
when the unknown becomes known 
by knowledge drawn from other sources shown.

The order for the comprehension of representation
is drawn from the recognition of units in combination.

My study has made me wiser than the experience of my years
because I have observed instruction from God's law extend beyond the fears
and tears drawn from the weird.

I restrain my action from evil
that I may keep my word intact in the legal.

I do not shrink from judgment by reason
because I was taught to judge with reasonable adhesion.

Unity in things essential is more important
than disagreement as the constant content in portent.

Has Christ been divided?
Such a view is misguided.

Is the name of your baptist the main concern for faith?
Baptism is the initiation that helps you to learn to deal with natural pain.

The gospel is the means by which to grow in Christ.
By this our unity is defined as essentially undivided.

Divine energy is sweet to my taste.
It is a product of experiential or literary grace.

I gained understanding from the experience of what is right
by direction from the commandments of God in law with insight.

The struggle to find truth with combination or division
continues with participation in the heavenly vision.

The administration of agriculture was named Galilee.
The corridor of land extended from the smaller to the larger sea.

Like the transcendence of Jacob by Israel
the law of the land was for the unity of the legally real.

The people who toiled in darkness
were shown a great light that would not disarm us.

John had stated, 'Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.'
Jesus declared the same message without asceticism implied by demand.

Peter, Andrew, James and John were fishermen by trade.
They left their nets to become fishers of men by Jesus made.

The Word provides a light for my feet.
Illumination in the dark is what I need
to believe, breath and see what I seek.

There is light enough to avoid snakes
or bad luck from mischief or mistakes.  

I have sworn and am determined 
to keep the rightness of the judgments illumined.

When I am deeply troubled
I ask for help to avoid the trouble doubled. 

The testimony from my lips has been accepted
as willing tribute for what is divine and not neglected.

Responsibility is organized for safety
with security as a measure for the stately.

Traps have been laid for me by the immoral
but I have not been deterred by their quarrel.

The promise of salvation is my inheritance. 
It is my support against conflict, adversity and insensate chance.

I have applied my heart to fulfill the divine statutes
by the application of principles for duty I can use.

I hate it when my mistake does me harm.
I love the rules that keep me armed for charm.

You are the safety that secures my refuge
My hope is in the word that will be used. 

I will not act on the impulse to cause harm
yet I will defend myself from attack that is so armed.

Sustain me with the shelter of your promise
that my hope will remain august and honest.

Hold me in safety with the length and strength of security
and I will delight in what's right in law beyond my maturity.

Consequence results from action in the world.
Deceitfulness adds dissonance to the consequential blur.

Reward for rightness or loss for the wrong
is consequence that judgment can discern to grow strong. 

Those who deny consequence for their action 
lose the sense of true consonance for their faction.

My flesh trembles with fear for salvation.
I fear the loss of benefit for the nation.

The Spirit soars
when love adores.

-----------------------

Psalm 119
Mem
13th letter
Water
Quomodo dilexi!
How I love!

97 Oh, how I love your law!
all the day long it is in my mind.
98 Your commandment has made me wiser than my enemies,
and it is always with me.
99 I have more understanding than all my teachers,
for your decrees are my study.
100 I am wiser than the elders,
because I observe your commandments.
101 I restrain my feet from every evil way,
that I may keep your word.
102 I do not shrink from your judgments,
because you yourself have taught me.
103 How sweet are your words to my taste!
they are sweeter than honey to my mouth.
104 Through your commandments I gain understanding;
therefore I hate every lying way.

Nun
14th letter
Snake
Lucerna pedibus meis
My feet

105 Your word is a lantern to my feet
and a light upon my path.
106 I have sworn and am determined
to keep your righteous judgments.
107 I am deeply troubled;
preserve my life, O Lord, according to your word.
108 Accept, O Lord, the willing tribute of my lips,
and teach me your judgments.
109 My life is always in my hand,
yet I do not forget your law.
110 The wicked have set a trap for me,
but I have not strayed from your commandments.
111 Your decrees are my inheritance for ever;
truly, they are the joy of my heart.
112 I have applied my heart to fulfill your statutes
for ever and to the end.


Samekh
15th letter
Support
Iniquos odio habui
I hate

113 I hate those who have a divided heart,
but your law do I love.
114 You are my refuge and shield;
my hope is in your word.
115 Away from me, you wicked!
I will keep the commandments of my God.
116 Sustain me according to your promise, that I may live,
and let me not be disappointed in my hope.
117 Hold me up, and I shall be safe,
and my delight shall be ever in your statutes.
118 You spurn all who stray from your statutes;
their deceitfulness is in vain.
119 In your sight all the wicked of the earth are but dross;
therefore I love your decrees.
120 My flesh trembles with dread of you;
I am afraid of your judgments.

--------------------
===============
--------------------

Psalm 119
13th, 14th and 15th letters

Mem
Water

Mem is the 13th letter in the Semitic abjads. These include the Hebrew mēm מ, Aramaic Mem, Syriac mīm ܡܡ, Arabic mīm م and Phoenician mēm.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek mu (ج), Etruscan M, Latin M and Cyrillic ج.

It is believed that the Phoenician word for “water”, mem (Phoenician mem.png) is a morphed and simplified Egyptian hieroglyphic symbol for water.

Mem, like Kaph, Nun, Pe, and Tzadi, has a final form that is used at the end of words. The shape is changed from מ to ם.

The letter is King over Water, Formed Earth in the Universe, Cold in the Year, and the Belly in the Soul in  the Sefer Yetzirah. The Sefer Yetzirah is the title of the earliest extant book on Jewish mysticism.

Some early commentators treated it as a treatise on mathematical and linguistic theory as opposed to Kabbalah. Yetzirah is more literally translated as "Formation"; the word Briah is used for "Creation".

The letter is associated with The Hanged Man (Atu XII), the element of water and the path between Geburah and Hod on the Tree of Life in Tarot cards.

The card for the Hanged Man shows  an image of a man being hung upside-down by one ankle. This method of hanging was a common punishment at the time for traitors in Italy. The solemn expression on his face suggests that he is there by his own accord.

The card is meant to represent self-sacrifice as opposed to corporal punishment for criminality. It means the person having the cards read can choose to correct himself to avoid the imposition of being corrected by others.

Gevurah is "the essence of judgment and limitation". It corresponds to awe and the element of fire.
Hod is explained as an analogy. One overcomes or submits to an obstacle in oneself instead of "conquering" some thing in one's way (Netzach).

Nun
Snake

Nun is the 14th letter of the Semitic abjads. These include the Phoenician Nūn, Hebrew Nun נ, Aramaic Nun, Syriac Nūn ܢܢ, and Arabic Nūn ن.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek nu (ح), Etruscan N, Latin N, and Cyrillic ح.

Nun is believed to be derived from an Egyptian hieroglyph of a snake. The Hebrew word for snake, nachash begins with a Nun and snake in Aramaic is nun. Nūn means large fish or whale in Arabic.
Naḥs in modern Arabic literally means "bad luck".

A rolled Nun passes play to the next player with no other action in the game of dreidel. A dreidel is a four-sided spinning top used to play the game with the same name during the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah.

Each side of the dreidel bears a letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The letters are  נ (nun), ג (gimel), ה (hei) and ש (shin).

These letters are translated in Yiddish to a mnemonic for the rules of a gambling game played with the dreidel. Nun stands for the Yiddish word nisht ("nothing"), Gimel for gants ("all"), Hei for halb ("half") and Shin for shtel ayn ("put in").

Together they represent the Hebrew phrase nes gadol hayah sham ("a great miracle happened there"). The statement refers to the Miracle of the cruse of oil.

The story of the miracle occurred after the liberation of the Temple in Jerusalem during the Maccabean Revolt as described in the Talmud. A  jug of pure oil that was to be enough to light the lamp for one day lasted for eight days.

Samekh
Support

Samekh is the 15th letter in the Semitic abjads. These include the Phoenician sāmek 𐤎‎ ; Hebrew samekh סָמֶךְ and Syriac semkaṯ.

The letter has no continuant in the Arabic alphabet, its numerical value is taken by Arabic Šīn.
The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek xi (خ).

The archaic "grid" shape of Western Greek xi (Greek Xi archaic grid.svg) was adopted in the early Etruscan alphabet (𐌎 esh), but was never included in the Latin alphabet.

The Phoenician letter may continue a glyph from the Middle Bronze Age alphabets. It is either based on a hieroglyph for a tent peg or a support. It may possibly be the djed "pillar" hieroglyph.

-----------------------

Bring the bull before the entrance of the tent. Aaron and his sons shall lay (samkh) their hands on the head of the bull. (Exo. 29:10)

 -----------------------

The act of laying on hands was used to consecrate a priest for service or an animal for sacrifice in a blood ritual.

The apostles combined the action with prayer for the restoration of good health.

-----------------------

What is the name for this season?
Winter.

Chn.  这个季节叫什么名字?
            Zhטge jלjiי jiאo shיnme mםngzל?
           冬季。
            Dōngjל.
Jpn.    今シーズンの名前は何ですか?
             Kon shīzun no namae wa nanidesu ka?
             冬。
             Fuyu.
Krn.    이번 시즌의 이름은 무엇입니까?
             ibeon sijeun-ui ileum-eun mueos-ibnikka?
             겨울.
             gyeoul.
Ltn.     Quod nomen hoc tempore
             Hiems.
Itln.     Qual ט il nome per questa stagione? Inverno.
Spn.     ¿Cףmo se llama esta temporada? Invierno.
Frn.      Quel est le nom de cette saison? Hiver.
Gmn.    Wie heit die Saison? Winter.
Dtch.     Wat is de naam voor dit seizoen? Winter.
Czch.     Jak se jmenuje tato sezףna? Zimnם.
Hngn.    Mi a neve ennek a szezonnak? Tיli.
Trk.         Bu sezonun adı nedir? Kış.
Grk.        Ποιο είναι το όνομα αυτής της σεζόν; Χειμώνας.
                Poio eםnai to ףnoma aftםs tis sezףn? Cheimףnas.     
Rsn.      Как называется этот сезон? Зима.
               Kak nazyvayetsya etot sezon? Zima.

-------------------

Isaiah 9:2



Map of 12 Tribes of Israel



Zebulun was the sixth son of Jacob and Leah. The name translates as 'home.' It was ascribed to one of the twelve tribes of Israel. It was to become one of the ten lost tribes at the time of Isaiah.

Joshua allocated the land among the twelve tribes after the conquest of Canaan according to the book ascribed to his name.

Zebulun was allocated the territory at the southern end of the Galilee. The eastern border was the small sea. The western border was the Mediterranean. The south was bordered by the Tribe of Issachar. The north had Asher on the western side and Naphtali on the eastern.

Zebulun is described as sending to the battle those that handle the "sopher shebet" in the ancient Song of Deborah. The "rod of the scribe" was a stylus of wood or metal used to inscribe clay tablets or to write on papyrus. It was depicted in certain Assyrian monuments.

Those who wielded it would have been the associates of lawgivers. The tribe was considered to have a symbiotic relationship with Issachar. Issachar was the tribe that traditionally was seen as having many scholars according to Jewish tradition.

Zebulun financially supported Issachar's devotion to the study and teaching of the Torah in exchange for a share of the spiritual reward from such research. The terms Issachar and Zebulun came to be used by Jews for anyone engaged in such a relationship.

The Revised Standard Version rendered the description in the Song of Deborah of the people sent to battle by Zebulun as "those who handle the marshal's staff". They weren't the scholars. They sent officials as officers.

Naphtali was one of the northernmost of the twelve tribes. The name means "my struggle." Joshua assigned Naphtali the eastern side of the Galilee according to the Bible. This region held the highly fertile plain of Gennesaret. Josephus had called the area the pride of nature.

The tribe produced farmers and fighters. Militarism was celebrated in Naphtali's history.
Ahaz, king of Judah, had appealed to Tiglath-Pileser III, the king of Assyria, for help c. 732 BCE.

Tiglath-Pileser sacked Damascus and Israel. He annexed Aram and a large part of Israel, "including all the land of Naphtali." The people were not allowed to have a king from their tribes.

Chapter 9 in the Book of Isaiah is a continuation of the prophecy started in Ch. 7 and continued in Ch. 8. It is composed of mingled threats and promises. Its characteristic may be said to be "rays of light thrown into the midst of shades."

It promises comfort and deliverance at the same time it denounces the sins of the nation. The anger of the Lord had not been turned away. The previous chapter had closed by describing a time of general calamity and darkness.

This begins Isa 9:1-4 by showing that the calamity would not be so great as in former times. It would be mitigated. There would be light, particularly in the dark regions of Zebulun and Naphtali.

--------------------

Isaiah 9:1-3

There will be no gloom for those who were in anguish. He brought into contempt the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali in the former time, but he will make glorious the way of the sea, the land beyond the Jordan, Galilee of the nations in the latter time.

The people who lived in a land of deep darkness--
on them light has shined.
You have multiplied the nation.
You have increased its joy.
They rejoice before you
as with joy at the harvest
as people exult when dividing plunder.

--------------------

The land of Zebulun and Naphtali had fallen into contempt
but from this curse they would ascend.

Each home struggled with the call to unity
in defense of tribal land as part of a larger community.

They had allied with a planned rebellion
that turned the land into a dwelling for hellions.

Darkness had obscured faith in the Light
as the means by which people came to sight.

The best end was hidden by the brightness.
It could be discerned by diligent forthrightness.

They rejoice before you as with the joy of harvest
but by your faith you will reach the farthest.

===============

Unity in Faith


Corinth was a classically cosmopolitan Greco-Roman city.

Its location by the sea made it accessible to other cultures. Poseidon was the chief god, but there were temples for Demeter, Octavia, Apollo, Hermes, Isis, Venus-Fortuna and Aphrodite.

The temple of Aphrodite on the Acrocorinth was reputed to have temple prostitution.
Competition for reputation was based on the claim to fame by association with a name.

Ecstatic experience was associated with religion. Too much thought might lead to the consideration of measure. Measure could be used to test for certain claims to fame, but there was always something about a cult that transcended investigation by experiment.

It was the experience of ecstasy that defied and defined Apollonian excess in measured existence.

T.S. Eliot expressed the WWII form of cosmopolitan consciousness in his poem The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.  The excess of measure was reduced to a physical household act when Prufrock declared:

I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;
I know the voices dying with a dying fall
Beneath the music from a farther room.
So how should I presume?

Competition is regarded as a beneficial part of nature insofar as it helps sensory perception focus on key elements in the production of a service. Too much competition however is divisive. It can result in enslavement to 'victory' as a form of idolatry.

The introduction to the first letter to the Corinthians renounced that which is wrong with the claim to authority by association with a name.

The new religious form for monotheism was looking like it would simply transfer the conflict between the gods to that between humans.

The author later referred to a letter that he had written earlier (1 Corinth. 5:9). He had explained that mixture with the immoral could corrupt the resurrected life in Christ.

His advice was, "Don't mix with the immoral." This may have been a major theme in the first letter.

The unity of the faith was to be found in Jesus as Christ. The preservation of the forward movement of society in the monotheistic form was expressed in the symbolic death of false gods in Christ crucified on the cross.

The same problem that had existed before the establishment of the church threatened to manifest in a different guise. Who baptized whom was packaged as the new competition. This also was all too human.

The anthropomorphism of the gods had the societal value for drawing attention to the unique frame for time with respect for the movement of the planets and stars. This uniqueness found expression in the immorality of divine beings.

This was not good insofar as it encouraged vice through stories about violence in aggression or cruelty in punishment.

Paul knew that the message of Christ crucified would not appeal to the wisdom of the world, but he felt that the church had to have a government that was directed toward societal benefit in advancement by faith in the love of God.

He downplayed his own leadership in terms of baptism in order to emphasize the value of the gospel for the Church and the larger society outside the community. The loyalty of believers was directed to the name of Jesus as the Author of salvation for the faith.

1 Corinth. 1:10-17

I appeal to you by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that all of you should be in agreement. There should be no divisions among you. You should be united in the same mind and the same purpose.

It has been reported to me by Chloe's people that there are quarrels among you. What I mean is that each of you says, "I belong to Paul', 'I belong to Apollos', 'I belong to Cephas' or 'I belong to Christ.'

Has Christ been divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul?
I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius. No one can say that you were baptized in my name. (I did baptize the household of Stephanas also. I don't know if I baptized anyone else beyond that.)

Christ did not send me to baptize, but to proclaim the gospel.

--------------------

Unity in things essential was more important
than disagreement as the constant content in portent.

Has Christ been divided?
Such a view is misguided.

Is the name of your baptist the main concern for our faith?
Baptism is the initiation that helps you to learn to deal with natural pain.

The gospel is the means by which to grow in Christ.
By this our unity is defined as essentially undivided.

===============

Upper and Lower Galilee


The area occupied by the tribes of Zebulun and Naphtali would become Lower and Upper Galilee by the time of the Roman occupation.

The fertility of the upper region made the land a symbol for cross-cultural development. The administrative function for Zebulun combined with the struggle to produce food from the land that had to be defended for the production of Naphtali. The union of administration with agricultural labor represented sustenance with the ability to increase production.

The cultivation of the darkness of the earth in the light of day was an expression of promise.

Matt. 4:12-23

When Jesus heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew to Galilee. He left Nazareth and made his home in Capernaum by the lake in the territory of Zebulun and Napthtali, so what had been spoken through the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled:

'Land of Zebulun, land of Naphtali,
on the road by the sea across the Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles--
the people who sat in darkness
have seen a great light.
Light has dawned
for those who sat in the region of shadow and death.'

Jesus began to proclaim from that time, 'Repent for the kingdom of heaven has come near.'

He saw two brothers as he walked by the Sea of Galilee. Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew, his brother, were casting a net into the lake for they were fishermen. He said to them, 'Follow me and I will make you fishers for men.' They left their nets and followed him immediately.

He saw two other brothers as he went from there. James son of Zebedee and his brother John were in the boat with their father Zebedee mending their nets. He called them. They left the boat with their father and followed him.

--------------------

The Land of Zebulun and Naphtali
was a corridor that extended from the sea of Galilee.

Like the transcendence of Jacob by Israel
the law of the land was for the unity of the legally real.

The people who toiled in darkness
were shown a great light that would not disarm us.

John had stated, 'Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.'
Jesus declared the same message without asceticism implied by demand.

Peter, Andrew, James and John were fishermen by trade.
They left their nets to become fishers of men by Jesus made.

===============

Truth



When Thomas Aquinas lived in the 13th century the works of  Aristotle had largely been forgotten in Western Europe.  These works started to become available again partly from Eastern European sources and partly from Muslim Arab sources.

The Muslims in Africa had most likely received translations from the Middle East and passed them into Europe through their occupation of Spain.

These works offered an exciting new way of looking at the world. The logic of Aristotle considered what a number of sources had to say, but unlike the Socrates in Plato's dialogs, he didn't use logic as a means to eliminate explicit agreement.

His dialectic reason offered the expansion of the capacity to look at virtually anything from the first person perspective to develop a philosophy that allowed for metaphysics.

Metaphysics was important in Greek and Roman exposition because it allowed for the relevance of observation by an observer. The focus was not just on the definition of order in nature as something that was outside of the human perspective.

There were  students of Aristotle that adopted him as as an alternative to Christianity. Others used his political philsophy as the means to justify slavery as the means to expand 'civilization.'

Christians who had been influenced by the anti-pagan legislation of Byzantine Romans defined Aristotle and Plato as enemies of the faith.

Thomas Aquinas was an example of the kind who used knowledge of scripture to consider the analysis of Aristotle's classical perspective to criticize the Islamic influence on European culture. It was felt that Islam was an incursion in Europe.

Aquinas was like the Muslims who had translated Aristotle's work in that he undertook to explain Christian ideas and beliefs in language that would make sense to disciples of Aristotle.

Aristotle's analytics were not as restricted to the control of a city state by a king or a despot as was the political philosophy of Plato.

His a posteriori analytics made it into the historical analysis of the history of Rome without explicit reference to his work. A number of patricians were inclined to see him as too imperial for their sense of republic.

This analytical approach was still radical in the time of Aquinas. Given the threat of exclusion or punishment represented by the Inquisition he lived on the edge of ecclesiastical approval.

His success can be measured by the prevalence of the notion that Christian scholars in the Middle Ages informed reason for faith with the work of Aristotle as a scholastic effort.

The insistence of Aquinas that logical argument must be prepared to meet argument from other scholars on their own ground to become familiar with the oppositional view. A logician can argue for his position from their premises. This technique has been a permanent and valuable contribution to Christian thought.   

The socialist position as derived from Marx has expressed the asceticism of the Christian religion as a means to convert the unconverted. The Christian logician can argue that though socialism is anti-religious, it doesn't prove that Christianity is false.

It can be asserted that the popularity of Marx is dependent upon the condemnation of capitalism by the demands of labor as supported by officials in government who are working for their bureaucratic power over the private sector.

The socialist position essentially reduces the existence of management, the middle class, the wealthy and Christianity to things that are in the way of the proletariat. It is a degenerative advocacy in the development of civilized society. It was the replacement ideology for slavery. 

Plato


Thomas Aquinas on Posterior Analytics

Posterior analytics is the study of patterns in analysis that retains consistency with the logical description of reality. It is about the experience of education with reason.

Physics is the study of nature. This study includes the description of forces that change things in the physical world. Change doesn't happen unless it is caused.

This study describes how things would work in nature without the observation of the observer. It is purely physical in terms of mechanical operations of matter and energy in space.

Metaphysics is concerned with first causes and the principles for how things work. It is derived from physics, but it is about that which is greater than the mechanical materialism in purely physical operations.

Free will is the expression of choice that seeks to order the randomness that occurs in the regular course of events to organize a structure that will result in a beneficial outcome.

How is it that we are to work the elements of chance to result in a desired benefit? Can we work to make luck produce good fortune?

Aristotle wrote in his Metaphysics, (980b26), “the human race lives by art and reason." The art of reason distinguishes humankind from other animals. Animals are prompted to action by instinct and impulse. A person is directed to act by judgment with reason.

Various arts are devoted to the ready and orderly performance of human action. An art is a definite and fixed procedure established by choice that produces a desirable effect.

Reason not only directs the action of lower powers, it selects its own direction for action. That which is particular to intellect is the ability to reflect upon itself. Intellect knows itself.

Reason is able to reason about its own operation.

The art of construction or production enables anyone capable to perform manual acts in an easy and orderly manner. This was thought that had reasoned about manual acts.

An art is needed to direct the act of communication, so the act of reasoning might proceed in an orderly and easy manner with the hope of producing a product with a benign purpose.

This art is logic. It is the science for reason with language. Logic is concerned with order for the meaning of expression in the act of organizing thought. Reason concerns itself with its proper matter, the ability to communicate ideas.

It is the art of the arts, because it directs us in order for the acts from which all arts proceed. The parts of logic are to be viewed according to diversity for the order of unity.

There are three acts of reason. The first two belong to the intellect. One action of the mind is the understanding of the unity of a simple thing.

It conceives what a thing is as it exists according to this action. This operation is called representation. Aristotle explained this in his book on Categories.

The second operation of the intellect is combination or division. The true or the false are present in this operation. Aristotle recorded his observations on this in the book entitled On Interpretation.

The third act is concerned with that which is unique to reason. This is the means by which to advance from one thing to another in such a way that through that which is known someone comes to a knowledge of the unknown.

This order for the comprehension of meaning with the structure for reason is considered in the remaining books of logic.

Text: Posterior Analytics I, Thomas Aquinas
Text: Posterior Analytics II, Thomas Aquinas

Brennan


Education has to have a reasonable means to test for comprehension with respect for age and grade level.

It is necessary to build the strength of student memory with instruction that starts with vocabulary and ends with student application in written expression.

Word recognition requires the correct order of letters that is given in the instruction of how to spell. Definition has to be given so the meaning of the word is recognizable.

The memory of definition has to be strengthened with repetition in the context of different contextual sets. There are different word games that allow for this action. Students can break down one word to make different words for review. They can play hangman to guess the spelling for a word based on the number of letters.

Variability in context allows the student to see that choice is an element of reason in the expression with words with the intent to communicate an idea.

Wordsearch facilitates word recognition.  Crossword puzzles, matching and fill in the blank games provide different contexts to strengthen the memory of the definition.

Verbal debates on a topic that includes the words being studied develops skill in verbal expression.
Around the World helps students to move around the room when the definition is remembered correctly.

Certain games lend a sense of order to the composition of tests to assess for retention. Matching the definition with the word can be combined with filling in the blank or multiple choice contests.

Short essays can be used until students have developed the capacity to express argument to defend an opinion.

The science of logic can be developed in an orderly and beneficial way for student achievement.

Is Republic in or with the Monarchy?


Federalist Paper #5

Anne was Queen of England, Scotland and Ireland between 8 March 1702 and 1 May 1707. She had been born in the reign of Charles II to his younger brother and heir presumptive, James II.

The House of Stuarts was suspected of Roman Catholicism. Charles had Anne and her older sister Mary raised as Anglicans for this reason.

Mary married William III of Orange. Orange was a province in southern France, but he was also a Stadtholder of Holland. This made him part of the Dutch reform.

The Dutch leadership was more radical than the English or the German monarchy, because they had adopted republic as their form of government.  This made their affiliation with Calvin strong and their opposition to the agreement between Henry VIII and Martin Luther a political cause.

The monarchy was defined as corrupt due to the claim to the divine rights of kings. The divine right was interpreted as an assertion of absolute power.

The marriage of William and Mary saved the monarchy in England, Scotland and Ireland by virtue of William's association with the Dutch reform.

Mary's Anglican position was shifted to allow Calvinism even though they had instigated the Civil War and replaced the monarchy with the commonwealth.

Anne married Prince George of Denmark. He was from the House of Hanover. This made him acceptable to Protestants in Germany, Denmark, England and Scotland. The Danes had an alliance with the French.

The marriage was arranged by Charles II with the hope of joining the parliaments of England and Scotland.

Her father, James II, had appointed Roman Catholics to military and administrative posts in defiance of the Test Acts that prohibited the action. He also tried to persuade Anne to baptize her youngest daughter as a Catholic.

The opposition to Roman Catholicism wasn't sectarian. The papal office had claimed supremacy. The claim would not have aroused much opposition if it were purely titular.

Papal supremacy was claimed prior to the call to the Crusades and the institution of the Inquisition. It also came before the assertion of investiture and the policy of indulgences.

The office of the pope was asserting itself as the emperor in fact or the power that determined the emperor's actions. Henry VIII's concern regarding the royal line of succession was supported by his protest against the sovereignty of the state being divided.

The English Civil War demonstrated that a 'house divided against itself' could not stand. The alliance between the Anglicans and Calvinists was strengthened. Rhetoric against Roman Catholicism as a threat to sovereignty was allowed.

The Calvinists favored control of parliament by the House of Commons. They had used the argument that royalty was corrupt for the civil war and to take control of parliament, but allowed for the restoration of the monarchy with the alliance with the Dutch reform in the marriage of William and Mary. 

William and Mary had no children so Anne was elevated to Queen after William died in 1702.

The Acts of Union were instituted by the parliaments of England (1706) and Scotland (1707) to form Great Britain as a single state.

John Jay made reference to Anne's letter about the union in the 5th Federalist Paper.

His argument as Publius was directed to persuade the public to agree to the union of the states with a Constitution for the national republic as a modern state. Those who were opposed to the national union were inclined to propose a confederacy with 3 or 4 regional governments.

The divisions in the Seleucid empire would only be divided according to geographical convenience according to that historical model. Jay and Madison were favorably disposed to a hybrid between the commercial empire of the Phoenicians and the Roman variation on the same.

The one year term limit for the cursus honorum or course of honor was too rigorous to be regarded as practical given the modern experience of the administration of law by parliament in Europe.

The recommended requirement of education in law was to be more rigorous for election to the Senate. The smaller yet more stately body was to temper the lesser requirements for election to the House of Representatives to guard against the populist inclinations of democracy.

The Calvinists in England had called themselves Puritans because they hoped that the charge that the royalty was corrupt would unify the local councils in parliament for self-determination.

The Calvinists in Scotland identified themselves as Presbyterians because they wanted to emphasize the local church government was run by presbyters or elders. The elders agreed on policy that was given to the parish as theirs as well.

That which was agreed to be the case by the elders was expected to be agreed to by the vote of the congregation. The will of the people was determined by the elders and passed to the people for agreement.

We are best acquainted with the history of Great Britain by the convenience of knowing the English language. The limitation to a single language isn't as beneficial as a multi-lingual capacity, but the history of Great Britain offers a microcosm of European relations with each other through Rome.

Jay offered agreement with the value of empiricism when he asserted that we could profit from the experience of British unity without having to pay as much to find the way independently.

While common sense indicated that the three kingdoms should be united as one, history shows that they were divided for ages. There was a constancy of quarrels that contributed to the report of wars.

Anne was born in England from a Scottish dynasty. When she spoke of her nationality she identified herself as English. It was a choice as well as a condition of birth. When she persuaded Scotland to join the union, she wrote about being joined in affection for protection against the animosities promoted by foreigners as enemies. 

Mutual jealousies were perpetually kept inflamed when the kingdoms were not united. The seperate states were more meddlesome than useful to each other.

Regional nations in America would invite the same kind of difficulties in the conflicts with bordering states and foreign powers.

It could not  be presumed that the same degree of sound policy, prudence and foresight would uniformly be observed by each of these confederacies for a long succession of years.

The argument to retain the confederacy was treated as an argument for the retention of separate confederacies. If the government did not have national security as a chief purpose for union, agreement for a confederate army would not be as strong.

The American government has not as yet legislated approval for a standing military. The existence of military bases on foreign soil is a major justification for the support for that which is supported by the government in practice.

Jay identified the North as the region of strength. The militia that had been raised for the Revolutionary War would come to be raised again for the Civil War. This was due in no small part to the classification of residents as citizens. Males could vote and own property at the time.

Jay would eventually lead the movement in New York to abolish slavery. Voting by former slaves was subject to populist contrivance at local levels. The national government would not recognize the right for African American males to vote until the 15th amendment was ratified in 1870.

He argued that the strength of the northern hive would come to excite the same ideas and sensations in the more southern parts of America which it formerly did in the southern parts of Europe.

He wrote that it would not be a rash conjecture to predict that its young swarms might often be tempted to gather honey in the more blooming fields and milder air of their luxurious and more delicate neighbors.

The harshness of the winter climate was used to anticipate the behavioral tendencies of those who would come to be called the 'carpetbaggers' of the Reconstruction period from the north.

Had these regional trends been left to form in confederacies it would not be reasonable to assume that alliance could have been organized for the combination and union of wills of arms and of resources necessary to put and keep them in a formidable state of defense against foreign enemies.

When did the independent states into which Britain and Spain were formerly divided combine in such alliance to unite their forces against a foreign enemy?

It was the divisions in Spain that allowed for the Muslim incursion. The inquisition was instituted after the Muslim occupation was overthrown as an act of overcompensation.

It was likely that the foreign nation with whom the southern confederacy might be at war would be the one with whom the northern confederacy would be the most desirous of preserving peace and friendship.

An alliance contrary to their immediate interest would not be easy to form. It would be more natural for these confederacies to apprehend danger from one another than from distant nations considering the distance from Europe.

Each of them should be more desirous to guard against the others by the aid of foreign alliances, than to guard against foreign dangers by alliances between themselves. It would be easier to receive foreign fleets into our ports and foreign armies into our country, than it is to persuade or compel them to depart.

Let candid judgment determine whether the division of America into any given number of independent sovereignties would secure us against the hostilities and improper interference of foreign nations.

Calvinism as a religious form was against monarchy in general. Locke made it clear in his treatise on civil government that the parts of the bible that favored monarchy were to be treated as history. The analytical philosophy of Aristotle allowed for the interpretation of the bible with respect for democracy.

The orientation allowed for local prejudice as the determinant force in law. The presumption of prejudice has since come to be used by populist socialism as a means to enforce national prejudice as a correction.

The national prejudice assumes that the majority is at fault for racism, sexism or capitalism. The majority then is overcorrected for the reelection of populists in Congress. These same 'representatives' favor the impeachment of the president on the basis that the office must have won the election by corruption.

The charges of abuse of power and the obstruction of Congress were made for the benefit of the state officials who made the charges. They were not formed with probable cause for investigation. The populists just want to see if the unsubstantiated formation of the charges for impeachment will win the popular vote.

Analytical philosophy also allows for the favorable interpretation of union. Union was described as stronger than division with respect for independence. The weakness of division would invite danger from foreign powers.

The royal family was tolerated in both England and Scotland at the time of the union as Great Britain. Queen Anne had argued for union on the basis that the agreement would provide protection from enemies.

The Acts of Union were enacted in 1707 to form Great Britain in anticipation of the larger union with the Irish kingdom in 1800.

Ireland became a republic with the institution of their constitution in 1937. Brexit presents another challenge to British unity insofar as there those who favor the European union over that of Britain.       
wiki Federalist Paper #5
Text: Federalist Paper #5

Logic
W.O. Quine

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Recognize

9.22.19
Maggie Grace

Recognize
Boundaries
认识到边界
Rènshì dào biānjiè
境界を認識する
Kyōkai o ninshiki suru
ps79
Agnoscis finibus terminabitur

They came 
to defame.

Hostiles have entered your land.
They have rejected the Constitution as a plan. 

They crossed the border illegally
to take money from the citizens strategically.

Your inheritance has been invaded.
Sanctuary by liberals has been abraded.

The temple built for divine design
has been profaned by the illegal line. 

The bodies of those murdered have been given as food for the birds of the air.
The flesh of your faithful were given to the beasts outside of legal affairs.

Blood has been shed on either side of the border.
There was no one there to observe the burial order.

Border Wall

Open borders make a parody of security.
Policy has run contrary to our maturity.

How long will the fire blaze as angry?
How long will the flesh burn like gangrene?

Correct those hostile to the divine will for the country.
Punish those who defy the law so bluntly.

They have devoured profit from competition.
They have agreed to the liberal fiction.

Do not hold our error against us forever.
We are working to build our national treasure
together.

Help us to find glory in the name of God.
Deliver us by forgiveness to help us beat the odds.

Why should liberals be allowed to ask, "Where is their victory?"
They seek to destroy opposition as contradictory 
to their conquest of history.

The protagonist was on the inside of order looking out, but not.
He found chaos in and outside the border without a plot.

Let the sorrowful sighs of sadness arise to the skies.
Spare those convicted of crime by the testimony of lies.

Whoever is constant in faithfulness can be trusted with more.
Those who have not been worthy of trust in another's store
did not earn the right to take excess, much less more.

What will come to those who operated dishonestly?
Restitution will be their largest commodity.

Let them suffer remorse for the reviling with which they reviled.
Let the remorse endorse the correction of error they compiled.

We are the people of God. Christ is our pastor.
We will give praise with thanks to recover from disaster.

The autumnal equinox has arrived.
The end of summer will be derived.

The earth will start to tilt away from the sun.
The light of day for work or fun 
will become shorter than the night's run.



The Harvest Moon serves as a sentinel in the sky
to remind us of the bounty that the earth with work supplies.

Orchids

The bible and prayer evangelized the frontier
while the tortoise ate the orchid without fear.

I mourn for those who have been hurt.
Dismay is felt for those who did not convert.

Conservative reform gives credit to things won in the past
as an expression of accomplishment by what our ancestors asked.

I urge that prayers be made for everyone including those in high positions.
Offer thanksgiving for petitions that have been acquisitioned.

Lead peaceful lives with dignity in constancy
that we may be found acceptable in the sight of divine economy.

abraded- scraped

----------------------

Harvest moon works as a sentinel of worth
収穫月は空のガードとして機能
Shūkaku tsuki wa sora no gādo to shite kinō

of the blessings of a working earth.
します働く地球の祝福の。
shimasu hataraku chikyū no shukufuku no.

-----------------------

79 Deus, venerunt
Light, they came

1 O God, the heathen have come into your inheritance;
they have profaned your holy temple;
they have made Jerusalem a heap of rubble.
2 They have given the bodies of your servants as food for the birds of the air,
and the flesh of your faithful ones to the beasts of the field.
3 They have shed their blood like water on every side of Jerusalem,
and there was no one to bury them.
4 We have become a reproach to our neighbors,
an object of scorn and derision to those around us.
5 How long will you be angry, O Lord?
will your fury blaze like fire for ever?
6 Pour out your wrath upon the heathen who have not known you
and upon the kingdoms that have not called upon your Name.
7 For they have devoured Jacob
and made his dwelling a ruin.
8 Remember not our past sins;
let your compassion be swift to meet us;
for we have been brought very low.
9 Help us, O God our Savior, for the glory of your Name;
deliver us and forgive us our sins, for your Name's sake.
10 Why should the heathen say, "Where is their God?"
Let it be known among the heathen and in our sight
that you avenge the shedding of your servants' blood.
11 Let the sorrowful sighing of the prisoners come before you,
and by your great might spare those who are condemned to die.
12 May the revilings with which they reviled you, O Lord,
return seven-fold into their bosoms.
13 For we are your people and the sheep of your pasture;
we will give you thanks for ever
and show forth your praise from age to age.

----------------------
================.
----------------------

Jeremiah 8:18-19

'The harvest is past, the summer ended
and we are not saved.'

For the hurt of my people I am hurt.
I mourn. Dismay has taken hold of me.

----------------------

The autumnal equinox has arrived.
The end of summer will be derived.

The earth will start to tilt away from the sun.
Daylight will become shorter than the night's run.

I mourn for those who have been hurt.
Dismay is felt for those who did not convert.

================

1 Timothy 2:1-3

I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions and thanksgiving should be made for everyone including kings and all who are in high positions so we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in godliness and dignity. This is right and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior who desires everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

----------------------

I urge that prayers be made for everyone including those in high positions.
Offer thanksgiving for petitions that have been acquisitioned.

Lead peaceable lives with dignity in constancy
that we may be found acceptable in the sight of divine economy.

================

Luke 16:10-12

Make friends for yourselves with wealth that when it is gone they may welcome you into the eternal home. Whoever is faithful in little is faithful also in much. Whoever is dishonest in little is dishonest in much. If you have not been faithful with wealth, who will entrust to you true riches? If you have not been faithful with what belongs to another, who will give you what is your own?

----------------------

Whoever is constant in faithfulness can be trusted with more.
Those who have not been worthy of trust in another's store
did not earn the right to take excess, much less more.

What will come to those who operated dishonestly?
Restitution will be their largest commodity.

================

Fall Equinox
Facts About Equinox

While the September equinox usually occurs on September 22 or 23, it can very rarely fall on September 21 or September 24.

A September 21 equinox has not happened for several millennia. It will happen twice in the 21st century in the years 2092 and 2096. The last September 24 equinox occurred in 1931. The next one will take place in 2303.

The equinox dates vary because of the difference between how the Gregorian calendar defines a year (365 days) and the time it actually takes for Earth to complete its orbit around the Sun (about 365 and 1/4 days).

This means that each September equinox occurs about 6 hours later than the previous year's September Equinox. This eventually moves the date by a day.

-------------------------

Self-Sufficiency

Philander Chase
b. 12.14.1775 Cornish, New Hampshire
d. 9.20.1852 Jubilee College, Illinois

Philander Chase was a bishop and an educator in the United States in the 19th century. His ancestors were Puritans. His parents were Congregationalists. He became an Episcopalian. He was a pioneer on the western frontier. This was in Louisiana, Ohio and Illinois for him.

His life gives a view of religion in the United States at the outset of its institution as a republic. His organizational skill for prayer and evangelization came from his education at Dartmouth College. He was trained to act as a missionary for the new nation with organization at the community level.
He helped to establish a number of churches before he became a bishop.

He organized Kenyon College as a seminary and a private liberal arts school in Gambier, Ohio. It was founded in 1824 with grants from Lords Kenyon and Gambier in England. Ohio became the 17th state on March 1, 1803

He founded Jubilee College in Illinois in 1840. It was one of the earliest educational enterprises in the state. It became the 21st state in 1818.

Self-sufficiency was the goal for both institutions.

The schools included a theological seminary, a college and a grammar school for boys. Kenyon had a printing press for local publications. Jubilee added a “seminary” for girls and a gristmill to grind grain.

Each had its own sawmill and farm. The schools were built with lumber from the saw mills. Instruction in small farming operations was offered. The school was named as an expression of thankfulness with joy.

Cornish

Cornish is a town in Sullivan County on the western border in southern New Hampshire.

The long ridge of Croydon Mountain follows the eastern boundary for the town. The highest point in the town limits is a knob on the mountain that reaches an elevation of 2,323 ft (708 m) above sea level. The Connecticut River bounds the town on the west.

There were 1,661 people as of the 2000 census.

The town was granted in 1763. It contained the area once known as “Mast Camp.” It was the shipping point for the tall masts that were floated down the river by English settlers.

It was incorporated by Colonial Governor Benning Wentworth in 1765. It was named for Sir Samuel Cornish, a distinguished admiral of the Royal Navy.

Philander Chase

Philander was born in Cornish, New Hampshire on December 14, 1775. His parents were Dudley and Allace Corbett Chase, the founders of the town. He was the youngest of 14 children. He utlimately survived his siblings.

His name was taken from the Greek root 'philandros.' It means lover. Philander showed his love for God with his life.

His ancestors had been Puritans who had fled to New England. His father was a deacon at the local Congregational church. He wanted one of his 5 sons to become a minister. Philander wanted to become a farmer, but his father persuaded him to go to college.

He enrolled at Dartmouth College for education in the ministry. It was while he was there that he discovered the Book of Common Prayer. It was like a reference book with short prayers for different occasions. It could be used by a priest or the laity.

The minister didn't have to create his prayer in the moment for the community. He would just read the prayers for the occasion. There was less disturbance caused by disagreement with personal choice in expression. The format carried the promise of organized evangelization.

Church communities could be established. Schools that entertained prayer could be organized with its help. He was so enchanted with the book that he became a lay reader in the Episcopal Church while at college.

He graduated from Dartmouth in 1795. The Episcopal Church in America was still in its infancy in the United States. It had been split from the Church of England during the American Revolution. Young men were not required to attend seminary in England, but there were no American Episcopal seminaries at the time. The first would not be founded until 1817.

Philander traveled to Albany, New York, to study under the Reverend Thomas Ellison.

He married Mary Fay of Hardwick, Massachusetts during the period of his instruction. They would have 2 sons before her death in 1818. George was born in 1797; Philander in 1800.

He was ordained as a deacon at St. George's Chapel on Long Island, New York on May 10, 1798. He was assigned to missionary duty by the bishop in the state's northern and western parts. Chase became one of only three Episcopal clergymen above the Highlands.

He traveled to evangelize by horseback in Troy, Lake George, Auburn and Bloomfield. He baptized, prayed and preached to meet the needs of widely scattered Episcopalians and other Protestants in the more rural areas.

He helped to organize the first congregation of Trinity Church in Utica, New York in 1798. St. John's Episcopal Church was established in the town of Canandaigua in the following year.

He was ordained as a priest in 1799. He was assigned to Christ Church in Poughkeepsie, New York. He preached to a community of Mohawk assembled in Canajoharie by the Society for the Propagation for the Gospel.

The Rev. Chase accepted a challenge to establish the first Episcopal congregation in Louisiana in 1805. He became the founding rector of what ultimately became Christ Church Cathedral in New Orleans.

He had moved south with Mary hoping to cure her of her tuberculosis. They left their children with relatives in New England.

Mary's health did not improve, but they wanted to oversee the further education of their sons George and Philander who had been accepted at the academy in Chesire, Connecticut.

He accepted a position as rector of Christ Church in Hartford in 1811.  He would serve there for 6 years. His autobiography called them the "Sunshine Years".

He felt the call to preach on the frontier. This urge was coupled with growing tension with John Henry Hobart, bishop of New York. Chase felt compelled to follow the migration west.

He settled in Worthington, Ohio, a small pioneer community established in 1803 by a group of fellow New Englanders. He purchased a tract of land for a farm and was appointed principal of Worthington Academy. His wife Mary succumbed to her illness in 1818.

He received the appointment of bishop of the newly-formed Diocese of Ohio after the loss of his wife. This appointment was met with much disapproval by several bishops. Chase was not consecrated until February, 1819. He married Sophia May Ingraham that same year.

Life in Worthington was not easy for the new bishop. His income from his farm and from Worthington Academy did not suffice. His position paid him no salary. He accepted the presidency of Cincinnati College in 1821 to improve his financial situation.

Chase would return to Worthington after about one year. He soon realized that the Diocese of Ohio was in dire need of help. He logged over 1200 miles on horseback between June 1820 and June 1821. He found it exceedingly difficult to find trained clergy.

The Episcopal Church paid little attention to its western expansion since its split from the Church of England. There was no expectation of help from the East. Bishop Chase formulated a plan.

He would found a theological seminary in the West to train clergy for the West. Other bishops objected to the plan, especially his rival, Bishop Hobart. General Theological Seminary had been founded in New York in 1817. Hobart believed that General was sufficient to train American clergy.

He was convinced that he could not raise the necessary funds in the US. He received a letter of introduction from Henry Clay to Lord Gambier and traveled to England. Kenyon College was founded with donations from his trip to England.

Chase initially set the college up on his farm in Worthington, but he soon determined that a new location was necessary. He purchased eight thousand acres of land in Knox County, northeast of Worthington. He was given help by Henry Curtis, a young Mount Vernon lawyer. Chase named the property Gambier.

Work began immediately on Gambier Hill. Kenyon College was moved to its new location in 1828. Chase had a saw mill built. Lumber from it was used to build the college building. He laid out the plot for a farm which he worked.

He was given a printing press as a gift from Lord and Lady Ackland for publications. He had a post office built for which he acted as the postmaster.

His theological seminary soon developed into a much larger educational institution. It included a traditional college and a grammar school.

Chase’s wife, Sophia, proved nearly as vital to the functioning of Kenyon College as the Bishop himself. She cooked for the students, nursed their illnesses and did their laundry. She managed affairs during the Bishop’s frequent trips to raise funds.

Some thought that Chase had misused monies donated to the theological seminary for the establishment and maintenance of the college. Others thought that the bishop of the diocese should not have charge of the college and the grammar school.

The Ohio Convention demanded that he relinquish some control in 1831. Chase was both frustrated and exhausted. He resigned the presidency of Kenyon College and the episcopacy of Ohio on September 9.

Chase left Gambier with his family and settled on a small farm 20 miles away near Millersburg. He named it the Valley of Peace. The next spring the family moved to Gilead, Michigan. He returned to the life of a simple farmer and itinerant minister.

He was elected the first bishop in a newly formed Diocese of Illinois in 1835. He looked to the East for aid for his new ministry. He received little help, so he quickly formulated plans for another theological seminary to be established near Peoria. He went to England again to raise the necessary funds.

He was greeted warmly by his English friends, but his efforts to raise money were less successful. He returned to American soil and began a fundraising tour of the southern United States.

This proved successful enough to allow him to lay the cornerstone for Jubilee College in 1839. Chase continued his travel and fundraising and left his cousin, Samuel, in charge of the day-to-day operations of the new college. The chapel at Jubilee was finished by 1841.

He wanted Jubilee to be a self-sufficient community as with Kenyon. His sons, Henry, Philander and Dudley managed the college farm and a large flock of sheep. Chase also built a sawmill and a gristmill on Kickapoo Creek.

Chase’s daughter, Mary, ran a small girls’ school. There was also a college and a grammar school along with the seminary.

His position within the church improved. He was appointed to preside in 1843 as the senior bishop.  His new college struggled to stay open. Fire destroyed the Jubilee saw and grist mills in 1849. A significant source of income was eliminated.

Its most important source of income would also be lost 3 years later. Chase was 77 by 1852. He had lived a hard pioneer life. His health began to fail. He was pulled from his carriage by his horse in September. He lingered for a few days, but died on September 20.

Jubilee College struggled without Bishop Chase at the helm. The doors were closed in 1862 after a decade. His son, Samuel, sought to open the college again after he had served as a chaplain in the Civil War. He was forced to start selling lands in 1871.

Bishop Chase was able to overcome the hardship of pioneer life to achieve his goal of bringing religion and education to the west. His position as a seminal figure in the history of the United States was established in the American frontier.

Dartmouth had originally been chartered as a missionary school for natives. The effort for this mission was limited by charity from the lower economic scale. It wasn't color blind.

Bishop Chase was a charitable leader who did what he could to provide for his students in an institution for a settled society. There would have been more integration if there had been less racial prejudice in either direction.

------------------------

Philander Chase
S. 菲兰德蔡斯
T.  菲蘭德蔡斯

菲 Fei       humble                菲  hi       thin                Fi    ふぃ   フィ         Pil  필  Phil               
兰 lan       orchid                  蘭  ran     orchid            ran  らん    ラン        lan  란  Lan                     
德 de        goodness             德  toku   ethics             da    だ-     ダ-            deo 더  more       
蔡 Cai       tortoise               蔡  sai      tortoise         Che ちぇ     チェ        Che 체  sieve               
斯 si          this                     斯  shi      this                isu   いす   イス          i     이  this         
                                                                                                                       seu  스   s                                                             
----------------------

The bible and prayer evangelized the frontier
while the tortoise ate the orchid without fear.

================

wiki Philander Chase
Lectionary: Philander Chase
NE Historical Society: Philander Chase
Jubilee College
Kenyon bio: P. Chase

------------------------

French history gives the reader the opportunity to consider a political system that entertained the restoration to monarchy as part of the vote. It is an investigation into the republican view of monarchy or republic.

The literary view looks at first person perspective as a consideration of different systems of thought. This explains how the relatively solitary life of a writer can be described as 'not alone' by Blanchot. The written word is an extension of identification with society.

Not Alone

Maurice Blanchot
b. 9.22.1907 Quain, Devrouze, France
d. 2.20.03 Le Mesnil Saint Denis, France

Maurice Blanchot was a French writer, philosopher and literary theorist in the 20th century. His work had a strong influence on post-structuralist philosophers such as Gilles Deleuze, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy.

His greatest influence has been felt in the fields of literature and literary theory. He wrote 11 novels and a series of essays. Many of the essays appeared in book form. None were bestsellers, but their quality counted. People were not always converted to his ideas, but they were invariably fascinated by him.

His fictional texts, Thomas the Obscure (1941), Death Sentence (1948) and The Madness of the Day (1949) are among the most unique and challenging in French literature.

His critical essays on Kafka, Rilke, Sade, Mallarmé, Hölderlin and his interpretation of the myth of Orpheus are considered canonical texts in the field of literary studies. His relationship to philosophy, though equally significant, is more nuanced and complex.

He sought to read philosophers on their own terms by engagement with their respective terminologies. He operated from inside the philosophical system in order to highlight the way in which the system inevitably opens onto an outside.

The tension between the functional scheme whether it was philosophical, political or textual and its anarchic unrepresentable outside was a commonly recurring trope within his writing.

Other recurrent themes can likewise be discerned in his work. These include an exploration of the paradoxes associated with death, repetition and time.

There are various aporias related to origins and ends as well. His writing shows him to be a thinker broadly committed to the privilege of anonymity and difference over identity and sameness.

This left his work with the French form of continental idealism. There was a shell within which different forms could operate, but the inside was dedicated to the avoidance of categorization rather than the identification of profit as the chief value.

It was the consequence of the liberal mechanism. 

Dijon, France

Quain is a small village in Saone-et-Loire. It lies between the Saone and Loire rivers. It is located about 80 km (50 mi.) south of Dijon in east central France.

The region is called Bourgogne-Franche-Comte. It is the result of the merger of the former regions of Burgundy and Franche-Comte in 2016. It is about the size of Switzerland.

The basement contains clay, sandstone, limestone, gypsum and alluvium, but the main subsoil resource is coal.

There are 3 mountain ranges in the area. The  Vosges massif is located in the north-east. The Jura extends over the entire eastern limit. The Morvan occupies a central position in the western part. The Vosges and the Jura meet in the Trouée de Belfort.

France was in the Third Republic at the start of the 20th century. The French Constitutional Laws of 1875 had defined the composition.

Calls for the re-establishment of the monarchy dominated the tenures of the first two presidents. The growth of support for the republican form of government among the French populace and a series of republican presidents in the 1880's gradually quashed prospects of a monarchical restoration.

The Third Republic established many French colonial possessions, including French Indochina, French Madagascar, French Polynesia and large territories in West Africa during the Scramble for Africa. All of them were acquired during the last two decades of the 19th century.

The early years of the 20th century were dominated by the Democratic Republican Alliance. The alliance was originally conceived as a center-left political body, but over time became the main center-right party.

Politics under the Third Republic were sharply polarized. Reformist France stood on the left as the heir to the French Revolution. Conservative France was rooted in the peasantry, the Roman Catholic Church and the army on the right.

The Third Republic endured for 70 years despite the sharply divided electorate and persistent attempts to overthrow it. It is the longest lasting system of government in France as of 2019 since the collapse of the Ancien Régime in 1789.

Maurice Blanchot

Maurice was born in Quain on September 22, 1907.

His family was Catholic. His father encouraged Maurice and his siblings to practice Latin at the kitchen-table.

He went to the University of Strasbourg to study philosophy and German. The university had one of the largest libraries in France at the time.

He met Emmanuel Levinas in 1926. Levinas was a Lithuanian born French Jewish phenomenlogist. The two began a life long relationship.

Blanchot had relocated to Paris by 1929. He briefly pursued the study of medicine at Saint Anne’s Hospital during the early 1930's.

He began his first collaborations with the journals of the French far-right. He was editor of the mainstream conservative daily the Journal des débats from 1932 to 1940. He contributed to a series of radical nationalist magazines while also serving as editor of the fiercely anti-German daily Le rempart in 1933.  He was editor of Paul Lévy's anti-Nazi polemical weekly Aux écoutes.

He expressed the opinion that France was being ruined by its constitution, the corruption of politicians and by foreigners. The worst enemy was Léon Blum's Popular Front government. He denounced "the degenerates and the traitors" who were governing France in the revue Combat in November 1936. He added that the day must come when the government should be brought down by the people.

Similar sentiments were expressed by anti-semitic writers attacking Blum. Blanchot was criticized for anti-semitism. This was not the case. Paul Levy's weekly Aux Ecoutes had been founded to denounce Hitler. His best friend was the Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. He did not use racially-exclusionary language or overt anti-semitic expression.

That he asserted that the government should be overthrown by the people made his polemical argument an advocacy for violence against France and the League of Nations of which it was part.  This was risked to warn against the threat to peace in Europe posed by Nazi Germany, but it was still seditious.

He worked in Paris during the Nazi occupation. He continued to work as a book reviewer for the Journal des débats from 1941 to 1944 in order to support his family. He wrote about such figures as Sartre and Camus, Bataille and Michaux, Mallarmé and Duras for a putatively Pétainist readership. Phillipe Petain served as the Chief of State of Vichy France from 1940 to 1944.

Blanchot laid the foundations for later French critical thinking by examining the ambiguous rhetorical nature of language and the irreducibility of the written word to notions of truth or falsity in these reviews.

His first novel, Thomas l'Obscur (1941), was an abstract work. It anticipated le nouveau roman in many ways. The ideal nouveau roman would be an individual version and vision of things.

It subordinated plot and character to the details of the world rather than enlisting the world in their service. The principal character, Thomas, had no personal history, was not situated socially and had no clear geographical location. There was no plot. There was only the set of the situation for description.

The work was an indication of Blanchot's postwar route. He would write a monthly article for the Nouvelle Revue Francaise from 1953 to 1968. It was these pieces, together with a number of collected essays, that would make his reputation as a literary critic.

His thought ran counter to the prevailing belief that literature and art should be dedicated to a cause to which writers have a duty to commit themselves. Blanchot believed that it was in writing itself that the author found his purpose. There was the use of language, the reality of silence and the overwhelming reality of death.

Blanchot met Georges Bataille in December 1940. Bataille had written strong anti-fascist articles in the thirties. They would remain friends until his death in 1962. Bataille was working on his book about Nietzsche when they met. He defined Nietzsche as a radically non-teleological adversary of Hegel.

Blanchot became a regular participant in the bi-monthly philosophical discussions at 3 rue de Lille at Bataille's invitation. He met Denise Rollin with whom he would later become friends.

Blanchot helped Bataille formulate the abortive project of the “Collège socratique” in late 1942.  He was present at the famous “Discussion on Sin” organized by Bataille in March 1944. The discussion was attended by Camus, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre and Klossowski, among others.

Blanchot's devotion to language was comparable to the observations of his friend Georges Bataille on obsessions and impulses. His devotion to the craft led him to support new writers such as Samuel Beckett and Alain Robbe-Grillet.

The spring of 1944 was a difficult time for both men. Bataille temporarily left Paris for Samois due to illness. Blanchot departed for his family-home in Quain.

He had been active in the Resistance and remained a bitter opponent of the fascist, anti-semitic novelist and journalist Robert Brasillach. Brasillach was the principal leader of the pro-Nazi collaborationist movement.

It was in Quain in June 1944 that Blanchot was put against the wall by a firing-squad and “mock-executed” by Nazi soldiers. These traumatic circumstances would be later recounted by Blanchot some fifty years later in his text, “The Instant of My Death” (1994).

He was on the move between Paris and various locales in the south of France throughout 1945 and 1946. It was during this period that he penned important essays on Kafka, René Char, Nietzsche and Hölderlin. He assisted Bataille in bringing to publication the first edition of the journal Critique.

Blanchot stopped work as a political journalist and began to write as a novelist and literary critic. He left Paris for the secluded village of Èze in the south of France in 1947. He spent the next decade of his life there.

He avoided the academy as a means of livelihood like Sartre and other French intellectuals of the era. He relied on his pen. He began a lifestyle of relative isolation. He would not see friends like Levinas for years though he continued to write lengthy letters to them.

Poor health was part of the reason for his self-imposed isolation. This was only part of it. His isolation was closely connected to his writing and is often featured among his characters.

He completed Death Sentence in 1947 and saw it published in June 1948. His third (and final) novel, The Most-High, featured a more political bent. It was also published in 1948.

It was followed by the fictional text, The Madness of the Day (1949) and another volume of critical essays, The Work of Fire (1949). The essays contained the seminal text, “Literature and the Right to Death” (first published in 1948). Lautréamont and Sade was published in 1949.

He was producing a new critical essay for publication virtually every couple of weeks by this point. He moved frequently during this period. He stayed with his brother, René, whenever he found himself in Paris.

He returned to the small house in Èze in September 1949. This would be his primary residence until 1957. He wrote some of the most influenctial critical essays of his career amidst the “essential solitude” of this medieval village overlooking the Mediterranean coast. The theoretical writings contained within The Space of Literature (1955) were included.

He published regularly in Nouvelle Revue Française from 1953 to 1968.

His mother died in 1957. Her passing affected the family greatly. He moved into his own flat on rue Madame in late summer 1958 after spending the winter with his brother and sister-in-law in Paris.

This began a new phase in his intellectual and personal itinerary. The return to Paris in 1957 was significant in a number of respects. First, it marked a renewed engagement with national politics. Second, it coincided with an increasing focus on questions of an explicitly philosophical nature which called for more rigor in that which was written.

The Algiers crisis of 1958, the collapse of the French Fourth Republic and the rise to power of de Gaulle ushered in a frightening new era in politics. Blanchot had not participated in national politics since the 1930's. He threw himself into the resistance against de Gaulle’s Fifth Republic.

He frequently met with Marguerite Duras and Dionys Mascolo throughout the late summer of 1958. Mascolo was a major influence on Blanchot’s political thinking during this time. He became involved with Mascolo’s anti-Gaullist paper (co-founded with Jean Schuster), Le 14 Juillet.

The marked change in Blanchot’s political thinking was clearly evident in his manifesto, “Refusal”. This was published in October 1958 along with another anti-Gaullist piece, “The Essential Perversion.”

When Francis Jeansen and twenty-three other dissidents were put on trial in September 1960 for opposing French colonial rule and supporting the Algerian struggle for independence, Blanchot, Mascolo, and a group of other intellectuals, determined to pen a declaration of solidarity with the defendants.

They wrote the "Manifesto of the 121". French soldiers in Algeria were called to desert rather than employ torture.

The document was named after the number of its signatories. Those who signed included Jean-Paul Sartre, Robert Antelme, Alain Robbe-Grillet, Marguerite Duras, René Char, Henri Lefebvre, Alain Resnais, Simone Signoret and others.

The manifesto supported the rights of conscripts to refuse the draft in Algeria. The manifesto was crucial to the intellectual response to the war.

Blanchot left his solitude to join the street demonstrations of the student protest movement in May 1968. He met the philosopher Jacques Derrida on one of the protests. They had both researched the work of Mallarmé, who had fulfilled Blanchot's belief that the hold on language was the supreme test of a writer.

He found himself at the heart of the anti-authoritarian movement as a member of the Comité d'action étudiants-écrivains. He penned numerous, unsigned pieces for the group’s magazine, Comité. He espoused a radical politics based upon a rejection of all forms of hitherto existing political order. It was to be a communism without communism.

Blanchot had distanced himself from the group by mid-1969. He cited its position in support of Palestine and opposition to the state of Israel as a reason in a letter to Levinas.

He worked continually in his writing to break the barriers between what are generally perceived as different "genres" or "tendencies". Much of his later work moves freely between narration and philosophical investigation.

He published La Communauté inavouable (The Unavowable Community) in 1983. This work inspired The Inoperative Community (1986), Jean-Luc Nancy's attempt to approach community in a non-religious, non-utilitarian and un-political exegesis.

He died on 20 February 2003 in Le Mesnil-Saint-Denis, Yvelines, France.

His work had been marked by an individual opposition to national movements. He repeated the European inclination to default to one form of socialism against the other. His position became nihilistic when he proposed a communism that was not communism. He was simply against any proposal for organization of any kind.

The argument against the liberal political mechanism rejects socialism and proposes that government employ the principle of the least force necessary to deter crisis. The liberal strategy as recorded by Locke sought to use the English bill of rights as the means to enslave or destroy any who would oppose government for the increase of benefit for liberals.

------------------------

Maurice Blanchot
S. 莫里斯布兰肖特
T. 莫里斯布蘭肖特

莫 Mo    do not                    莫  baku    must not                 Mo  も-      モ-           Mo 모  mother     
里 li        inside                    里  ri          village                    ri      り         リ          li    리  lee 
斯 si        this                        斯 shi        this                         su     す        ス           seu  스  s       
布  Bu     cloth                      布 fu         linen                       Bu    ぶ       ブ            Beul 블 Bl
兰  lan    orchid                    蘭 ran        orchid                     ran  らん    ラン        lang  랑 lang   
肖  xiao  to resemble            肖 sho       resemblance           sho  しょっ ショッ    has    핫 hot       
特  te       unique                   特 toku     special                    to     と         ト               

----------------------

The protagonist was on the inside of order looking out, but not.
He found chaos in and outside the border without a plot.

================

wiki Maurice Blanchot
IEP: Blanchot
Gdn Obituary: Maurice Blanchot