Respect
Security
尊重安全
Zūnzhòng ānquán
セキュリティを尊重する
Sekyuriti o sonchō suru
ps87
The city was built on a small mountain.
The mountain grounded that which was founded.
Height held the advantage of sight for distance.
When invaders attacked the city was prepared for resistance.
Traders from different directions could be seen.
Welcome was prepared by the social machine.
The gate to the city welcomed visitors, family and friends.
It wasn't closed to ministers, misters, sisters or gems.
The gate was the way through which travelers entered.
Messengers shared word as a gift from the sender.
Egypt and Babylon were among those who knew me.
Revelation was the gate for the truth of our history.
Philistia, Tyre and Ethiopia were partners in trade.
Weapons, wheels and cattle were the offerings they made.
The ring of fellowship is that which unites.
Power is grounded in defense of alliance.
Alliance against the destructive elements
prepares people for defense against violence.
Cooperation extends beyond alliance.
Trade requires tact with respect for self-reliance.
The military is drawn from the people.
Training in strength overcomes feeling feeble.
Search for those lost while at work or at play
lends experience to training in a beneficial way.
The source of life is love.
Rescue comes from within and from above.
Zion is a lion on a hill.
Orion and Kiron match the iron will.
The Most High will sustain her.
She is a mighty cat that can still purr.
Accord with belief in what's right in law
is a birth that helps us grow despite our flaws.
The singers and dancers will show,
"Fresh springs are for your refreshment to know."
Pretend pre-dawn is light though dark
to watch your mind define the start.
We proclaim good news for your sake
that faith may shine to make your heart wake
to the knowledge of Christ that you may partake
of that which is great.
The Son of Man has been glorified
to bear fruit in the divine will for good as implied
for life.
---------------------------
Psalm 87
Fundamenta ejus
Her foundation
1 On the holy mountain stands the city he has founded;
the Lord loves the gates of Zion
more than all the dwellings of Jacob.
2 Glorious things are spoken of you,
O city of our God.
3 I count Egypt and Babylon among those who know me;
behold Philistia, Tyre, and Ethiopia:
in Zion were they born.
4 Of Zion it shall be said, "Everyone was born in her,
and the Most High himself shall sustain her."
5 The Lord will record as he enrolls the peoples,
"These also were born there."
6 The singers and the dancers will say,
"All my fresh springs are in you."
--------------------------
2 Corinth. 4:5-6
We do not proclaim ourselves. We proclaim Jesus Christ as Lord and ourselves as yours for Jesus' sake. It is the God who said, 'Let light shine out of darkness' who has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
--------------------------
We proclaim good news for your sake
that faith may shine to make your heart wake
that in the knowledge of Christ you may partake
of that which is great.
===================
John 12:23-4
Jesus answered them, 'The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain. If it dies, it bears much fruit.'
--------------------------
The Son of Man has been glorified
to bear fruit in the divine will for good as implied
for life.
===================
Martyrs of the Reformation
Lectionary
The Roman Catholic Church commemorates the Forty Martyrs of England and Wales on this date. (May 4) These were men and women who were executed for treason between 1535 and 1679 for their allegiance to the Catholic Church.
The Church of England has shared this commemoration in recent years. The scope of the recognition has been broadened to all of the English saints and martyrs of the Reformation era. Anglican martyrs like Thomas Cranmer, Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley died for their adherence to the Church of England.
Objectivity requires the remembrance of those Catholics who were killed by Anglicans. All other Christians who were persecuted by their fellow Christians for their beliefs are to be remembered with respect for their courage in faith as well.
The Quakers helped organize the movement to outlaw slavery. The Anabaptists were Swiss reformists who helped to reform the reform of the Protestant Reformation. They advocated for adult baptism for the knowledge of faith. They were persecuted along with Quakers by both Protestant and Catholic forces.
-------------------------
Agnosticism
Thomas Henry Huxley
b. 5.4.1825 Ealing, London, England
d. 6.29.1895 Eastbourne, Sussex, England
Ealing
Ealing is a district in west London. It was a rural village in the county of Middlesex when the area was not part of the larger city. The urban expansion in the late 19th and early 20th century incorporated the area.
The village was mostly made up of open countryside and fields where the main occupation was farming as in previous centuries. The transport of heavy goods tended be restricted to those times when the roads were passable due to dry weather with the exception of driving animals into London on foot.
The highway was graveled with the passage of the Toll Road Act. The old Oxford Road became an increasingly busy and important thoroughfare running from east to west through the center of the parish. This road was later renamed as Uxbridge Road.
The well-to-do of London began to see Ealing as a place to escape from the smoke and smells. The architect John Soane bought Payton Place in 1800. He renamed it Pitzhanger Manor. It was not bought as a place to live. It was somewhere green and pleasant where he could entertain his friends and guests.
The Duke of Kent bought a house at Castlebar soon after (1801). More affluent Londoners followed but with the intention of taking up a permanent residence which was conveniently close to the city.
More food and materials went in and more finished goods came out as London grew in size. Draft horses were used to haul loads. Frequent overnight stops were needed since they can only haul loads a few miles per day.
A large number of inns were situated along the Uxbridge Road to satisfy this demand. Horses could be changed and travellers refreshed. The road came to be favored by highwaymen.
Stops in Ealing included The Feathers, The Bell, The Green Man and The Old Hats. There were two pubs called the Old Hat at one point in history. They were located either side of one of the many toll gates on the Uxbridge Road in West Ealing. The westernmost pub was renamed The Halfway House following the removal of the toll gate.
George IV was King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland after the death of his father George III on 29 January 1820. He also became the King of Hanover. He retained the throne until his death in 1830.
He had served as Prince Regent during his father's mental illness from 1811 until his accession. He commissioned John Nash to build the Royal Pavilion in Brighton and to remodel Buckingham Palace. Sir Jeffry Wyattville was awarded the contract to rebuild Windsor Castle.
Robert Jenkinson was the British Prime Minister from 1812–1827. He was the Earl of Liverpool and was referred to as such. Lord Liverpool controlled the government during the regency and reign of George IV. He called for repressive measures at the domestic level as Prime Minister. He sought to maintain order after the Peterloo Massacre of 1819.
He had to steer the country through the period of radicalism and unrest that followed the Napoleonic Wars. He favored commercial and manufacturing as well as the landed interest. He sought compromise in the heated issue of Catholic emancipation.
The revival of the economy strengthened his political position. He was the leader of a reform faction of "Liberal Tories" who lowered the tariff by the 1820's. He abolished the death penalty for many offenses and reformed the criminal law.
T. H. Huxley
Thomas Henry Huxley was a British biologist. He was called "Darwin's bulldog" for his advocacy for Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. He was the grandfather to Julian, Aldous and Andrew Huxley. He was a critic of organised religion and devised the words "agnostic" and "agnosticism" to describe his own views.
Thomas was born on 4 May 1825 in Ealing when it was a village in Middlesex. He was the second youngest of the eight children of George Huxley and Rachel Withers. He was brought up in a literate middle-class family which had fallen on hard times. Other British scientists of the nineteenth century such as Alfred Russel Wallace shared a similar experience.
His father was a mathematics teacher at Ealing School until it closed. The closing of the school put the family into financial difficulties. His parents were Anglicans, but he sympathized with the town's Nonconformist against organized religion. Thomas left school after only two years of formal schooling at age 10. The family moved to Coventry.
Thomas was determined to educate himself despite his limited education. He became one of the great autodidacts of the nineteenth century. He read Thomas Carlyle, James Hutton's Geology and Hamilton's Logic to start. He taught himself German in his teens.
He eventually became fluent enough to be used by Charles Darwin as a translator of scientific material in German. He learned Latin and enough Greek to read Aristotle in the original.
He made himself an expert on invertebrates and later on vertebrates as a young adult. He was skilled in drawing and did many of the illustrations for his publications on marine invertebrates.
He was apprenticed for short periods to several medical practitioners. He went to his brother-in-law John Cooke in Coventry at 13.
Cooke passed him on to Thomas Chandler. Chandler was notable for his experiments using mesmerism for medical purposes. His practice was in London's Rotherhithe amidst the squalor endured by the Dickensian poor. Here Thomas would have seen poverty, crime and rampant disease at its worst.
John Salt, his eldest sister's husband, took him on later. Huxley entered Sydenham College at 16. Sydenham was a cut-price anatomy school whose founder, Marshall Hall, discovered the reflex arc. Huxley continued his personal program of reading to make up for his lack of formal education in school.
Huxley was admitted to study at Charing Cross Hospital where he obtained a small scholarship a year later. He was taught by Thomas Wharton Jones, Professor of Ophthalmic Medicine and Surgery at University College London.
Jones had been Robert Knox's assistant when Knox bought cadavers from Burke and Hare. The young Jones was exonerated of crime. He had acted as go-between. He thought it best to leave Scotland though. He was a fine teacher as he was up-to-date in physiology. He was also an ophthalmic surgeon.
Huxley published his first scientific paper in 1845 under Wharton Jones' guidance. He demonstrated the existence of a hitherto unrecognised layer in the inner sheath of hairs. The band has been known since as Huxley's layer. He organised a pension for his old tutor later in life.
He passed his First M.B. examination at the University of London at 20. He won the gold medal for anatomy and physiology. He did not present himself for the final (Second M.B.) exams and consequently did not qualify with a university degree.
He was too young to apply to the Royal College of Surgeons for a licence to practise and he was 'deep in debt'. He applied for an appointment in the Royal Navy at a friend's suggestion.
He had references on character and certificates showing the time spent on his apprenticeship and on requirements such as dissection and pharmacy. Sir William Burnett, the Physician General of the Navy, interviewed him and arranged for the College of Surgeons to test his competence by means of an oral exam.
He was made 'surgeon's mate' for HMS Rattlesnake. This was a marine naturalist in practice. The craft about to set sail on a voyage of discovery to survey New Guinea and Australia. The Rattlesnake left England on 3 December 1846.
He devoted his time to the study of marine invertebrates once they had arrived in the southern hemisphere. He began to send details of his discoveries back to England. Publication was arranged by Edward Forbes FRS. He had also been a pupil of Knox. Forbes was something of a mentor to Huxley both before and after the voyage.
He had mailed back research results to England from each port of call. He collected and studied cnidarians, tunicates and cephalopod molluscs. When he returned to England in October 1850 he found that his research results had won him acceptance into the ranks of the English scientific establishment.
He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society. He not only received the Royal Society Medal but was also elected to the Council in the following year at the age of 26. He met Joseph Dalton Hooker and John Tyndall. They remained his lifelong friends.
The Admiralty retained him as a nominal assistant-surgeon, so he might work on the specimens he collected and the observations he made during the voyage of the Rattlesnake. He solved the problem of Appendicularia.
Johannes Peter Müller had found himself wholly unable to assign the place for the class in the animal kingdom. It and the Ascidians are both, as Huxley showed, tunicates. Today they are regarded as a sister group to the vertebrates in the phylum Chordata.
Other papers on the morphology of the cephalopods and on brachiopods and rotifers are also noteworthy. The Rattlesnake's official naturalist, John MacGillivray, did some work on botany. He proved surprisingly good at notating Australian aboriginal languages. He wrote up the voyage in the standard Victorian two volume format.
Huxley became acquainted with scientists like the geologist Charles Lyell, the botanist Joseph Hooker, the philosopher Herbert Spencer and the naturalist Charles Darwin. Professional positions in science were rare at the time. Most naturalists were affluent amateurs. Huxley managed to support himself on a stipend from the Navy and by writing popular science articles.
He secured a lectureship at the School of Mines in London after leaving the Navy in 1854. He sent for the fiancée he had met in Sydney. They were married in 1855. He was Fullerian Professor at the Royal Institution 1855–58 and 1865–67; Hunterian Professor at the Royal College of Surgeons 1863–69; President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 1869–1870; President of the Quekett Microscopical Club 1878; President of the Royal Society 1883–85; Inspector of Fisheries 1881–85; and President of the Marine Biological Association 1884–1890.
The thirty-one years during which Huxley occupied the chair of natural history at the Royal School of Mines included work on vertebrate palaeontology and on many projects to advance the place of science in British life.
He was an outspoken defender and advocate for Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. He was an opponent of any evolutionary change at all at first. He believed that the living world had stayed much the same for as far back as its history could be traced.
He felt that modern taxa would eventually be found in the oldest rocks. He came to accept Darwin's position on evolution. His reaction to reading the Origin of Species was "How stupid of me not to have thought of that."
He is known for his debate in June 1860 at the British Association meeting at Oxford. His opponent was Archbishop Samuel Wilberforce. Wilberforce was coached against Huxley by Richard Owen.
The Archbishop ridiculed evolution and asked Huxley whether he was descended from an ape on his grandmother's side or his grandfather's. It has been said that Huxley rose to defend Darwin's theory and concluded with the rejoinder, "I would rather be the offspring of two apes than be a man afraid to face the truth."
Huxley did not blindly follow Darwin's theory. He critiqued it even as he was defending it. Darwin had seen evolution as a necessarily slow, gradual, continuous process. Huxley thought that an evolving lineage might make rapid jumps, or saltations.
He wrote to Darwin just before publication of the Origin of Species, "You have loaded yourself with an unnecessary difficulty in adopting Natura non facit saltum [Nature does not make leaps] so unreservedly."
Huxley's support for natural selection is contrasted with his earlier attacks on the evolutionary theories put forth by Lamarck and Robert Chambers. Both of these theories advocated some kind of progression. Some kind of general tendency was present in all organisms to evolve "upward" into more and more complex forms.
Huxley would have nothing to do with such progressionist ideas. He regarded these as being more metaphysical than scientific. This mistrust of progression lay behind his initial skepticism of all evolutionary ideas.
He also rejected the then-popular theory of recapitulation proposed by Karl von Baer. Huxley had translated his writing from the German. He wrote, "the progress of a higher animal in development is not through the forms of the lower, but through forms which are common to both lower and higher..."
He had an important influence upon English thought through his numerous addresses and essays on the topics of science, philosophy, religion and politics. He wrote papers entitled 'The Physical Basis of Life' (1868), and 'On the Hypothesis that Animals are Automata' (1874). He made a monograph on Hume (1879) and wrote the Romanes lecture Ethics and Evolution (1893).
He made contributions to ethics. He concluded that the safety of morality lay "in a real and living belief in that fixed order of nature which sends social disorganization on the track of immorality in a paper entitled 'Science and Morals' (1888)."
His Romanes lecture revealed a different tone. The moral order is contrasted with the cosmic order in it. Evolution shows constant struggle. He "repudiates the gladiatorial theory of existence" instead of looking to it for moral guidance.
He saw that the facts of historical process did not constitute validity for moral conduct. His plain language compelled others to see the same truth. He did not leave room for the influence of moral ideas as a factor in the historical process.
Huxley was also a major influence in the direction taken by British schools. He was voted onto the London School Board in November 1870. He advocated a wide range of disciplines, similar to what is taught today in primary school: reading, writing, arithmetic, art, science, music, etc.
He recommended two years of basic liberal studies followed by two years of some upper-division work that focused on a more specific area of study in secondary education.
A practical example of the latter is his famous 1868 lecture On a Piece of Chalk which was first published as an essay in Macmillan's Magazine in London later that year. The piece reconstructs the geological history of Britain from a simple piece of chalk and demonstrates science as "organized common sense."
Huxley supported the reading of the Bible in schools. This may seem out of step with his agnostic convictions, but he believed that the Bible's significant moral teachings and superb use of language were relevant to English life. He said, "I do not advocate burning your ship to get rid of the cockroaches".
Huxley proposed to create an edited version of the Bible that was shorn of "shortcomings and errors... statements to which men of science absolutely and entirely demur... These tender children [should] not be taught that which you do not yourselves believe".
The Board voted against his idea. It also voted against the idea that public money should be used to support students attending church schools. Vigorous debate took place on such points. The debates were minuted in detail. Huxley said "I will never be a party to enabling the State to sweep the children of this country into denominational schools".
The Act of Parliament which founded board schools permitted the reading of the Bible, but did not permit any denominational doctrine to be taught.
Huxley was a determined opponent of organised religion throughout his life. He wrote the "Roman Church... carefully calculated for the destruction of all that is highest in the moral nature, in the intellectual freedom, and in the political freedom of mankind".
He used the expression "the so-called Christianity of Catholicism" in an article in Popular Science. He explained: "I say 'so-called' not by way of offense, but as a protest against the monstrous assumption that Catholic Christianity is explicitly or implicitly contained in any trust-worthy record of the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth."
It looks like he waxed toward the Calvinist critique of the Roman Church.
Huxley's interest in adult education went further than school and university classrooms. He made an effort to reach interested adults of all kinds. He was largely self-educated after all. He had lecture courses for working men. He made use of journalism to earn money in his appeal to reach the literate public.
He wrote for periodicals for most of his adult life. His articles were published by the Westminster Review, the Saturday Review, the Reader, the Pall Mall Gazette, Macmillan's Magazine, the Contemporary Review. Germany was still ahead of Victorian Britain in formal science education, but interested people could use their initiative and find out what was going on by reading periodicals and using the lending libraries.
The technique of printing his more popular lectures in periodicals which were sold to the general public was extremely effective. A good example was The physical basis of life, a lecture given in Edinburgh on 8 November 1868.
The theme was that vital action is nothing more than "the result of the molecular forces of the protoplasm which displays it." It shocked the audience. That was nothing compared to the uproar that was created when it was published in the Fortnightly Review for February 1869.
John Morley, the editor, said "No article that had appeared in any periodical for a generation had caused such a sensation". The issue was reprinted seven times. Protoplasm became a household word. The name 'Professor Protoplasm' was added to his other soubriquets.
The topic had been stimulated by Huxley seeing the cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells. Huxley claimed that this activity should not be explained by words such as vitality, but by the working of its constituent chemicals.
This was shocking to the public at the time. Today we would perhaps emphasise the extraordinary structural arrangement of those chemicals as the key to understanding what cells do, but little of that was known in the nineteenth century.
He regarded consciousness as a collateral effect of certain physical causes. It was an effect, not a cause. Physical phenomena can be analyzed as states of consciousness. This leaves mental fact in the position of being the effect of something that is fact.
The Archbishop of York thought this 'new philosophy' was based on Auguste Comte's positivism. Huxley corrected him: "Comte's philosophy [is just] Catholicism minus Christianity." (Vol 1 Collected Essays 156, 1893).
Huxley wrote on many issues relating to the humanities in the ten years after his retirement.
Evolution and Ethics addressed the question of whether biology has anything particular to say about moral philosophy. Huxley and his grandson Julian Huxley gave Romanes Lectures on this theme. Huxley dismissed religion as a source of moral authority.
He believed the mental characteristics of man are as much a product of evolution as the physical aspects. Our emotions, our intellect, our tendency to prefer living in groups and spend resources on raising our young are part and parcel of our evolution. These traits are inherited.
The details of our values and ethics are not inherited. They are determined by our culture and chosen by ourselves. Morality and duty are often at war with natural instincts. Ethics cannot be derived from the struggle for existence: "Of moral purpose I see not a trace in nature. That is an article of exclusively human manufacture."
It is our responsibility to make ethical choices. This put Huxley in the compatibilist category in the Free Will vs Determinism debate. He was diametrically opposed to his old friend Herbert Spencer in this argument.
Huxley's dissection of Rousseau's views on man and society is another example of his later work. The essay undermined Rousseau's ideas on man as preliminary to undermining his position on the ownership of property. A characteristic statement is: "The doctrine that all men are, in any sense, or have been, at any time, free and equal, is an utterly baseless fiction."
Huxley's strategy for persuasion and his tactics in argument are an object for study. His career included controversial debates with scientists, clerics and politicians; persuasive discussions with Royal Commissions and other public bodies; lectures and articles for the general public, and a mass of detailed letter-writing to friends and other correspondents. A large number of textbooks have excerpted his prose for anthologies.
He moved from London to Eastbourne where he edited the nine volumes of his Collected Essays in 1890. He heard of Eugene Dubois' discovery in Java of the remains of Pithecanthropus erectus (now known as Homo erectus) in 1894. He died of a heart attack after contracting influenza and pneumonia in 1895. He was buried in North London at St Marylebone.
Thomas Henry Huxley founded a dynasty of English scientists and thinkers. His son Leonard was a noted biographer and "man of letters." Leonard's oldest son Julian was one of the authors of the evolutionary synthesis of the early 20th century. Julian's son Francis became a noted anthropologist.
Another of Leonard's sons, Andrew was also an eminent scientist who shared the 1963 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on nerve impulses and muscle contraction. Julian's brother Aldous Huxley was a novelist, screenwriter and essayist. His best-known book is the anti-utopia Brave New World. A more distant relative, Leonard George Golden Huxley, became a prominent physicist.
Thomas Huxley was part of a movement towards the institution of the threat of rebellion as a constituent force in parliament. His position against the Roman Church as organized religion was subjective and prejudiced. It used language derived from the Puritan position against foreign influence on the English bible.
I think that the leadership for the Roman Church had the organization of the European continent as a defense of the culture. That strikes me as a reasonable goal in the light of what happened to Rome in history. Had the goal been limited to the European culture with respect for the defense of boundaries, it would have been successful.
When the invasion of the Holy Land in the Middle East was used to unite the kingdoms and tribes of Europe, the integrity of the goal was compromised. This difficulty has been amended with the establishment of Israel as a modern state.
It is understandable that Muslims desire the unity of the Middle East for their cultural security as well. The difficulty from the Roman perspective is that they destroyed the kingdoms of Judah and Galilee in order to establish republic as the acceptable form for government.
The Judaic religion can be seen as the parent religion for monotheism in Christianity and Islam. Roman monotheism owes recognition to Israel. The restoration of the homeland for the Jews presented itself as a moral imperative.
Islam was a protest against the level of civilization that was expected of their tribal society by the Byzantine Romans. Their monotheism took a step back towards polytheism with respect for classical culture. It wasn't until the discovery of oil that Saudi Arabia had enough wealth to enlarge the relatively small degree of settlement that they had.
The Ottomans weren't all that Islamic in their political organization. The use of slavery placed them closer to Hellenic and Roman polytheistic empire. The institution was probably used as a way to force settlement on the tribes in their territory.
The hostile position that Huxley expressed toward the Roman Church obscured the Church's contribution to British society for the sake of pre-Christian Roman political belief. European nations have been sorting through what was right about classical culture in order to organize against that which was not good about it. Reconstruction is still a large if largely unnamed objective.
His support for Darwin's evolution allowed for a position that has become characterized by a general belief in the aggression of natural selection. The Calvinist investment in rebellion against corruption couldn't be sustained indefinitely. Belief in aggression however reflected the Roman confabulation of the law of nations with that of nature.
Huxley was also an early advocate for socialism. This was intended as a next step in the promotion of precipitation as the defining characteristic for British parliament. He made some interesting proposals regarding the relations between morality, education and nature.
Agnosticism is a position that emphasizes the weight of evidence, but the objectivity of the position is compromised by the prejudice against organized religion as the basis for European unity in the defense of borders. The prohibition of guns in Great Britain is more an expression of legislative aggression against the rights of people, than it is a protection for the same.
Immanuel Kant had made a similar proposal for 'perpetual peace' as promoted by the Prussian empire. It involved unilateral disarmament. This leaves people without defense from attack at a personal level.
Locke had established a deceptive device that used the claim of civil rights as the basis for enslavement and colonial expansion with the military. His position rejected the authority of the monarchy and the sensibility of defense from attack as argued by Hobbes. It was a major step in using fear of the threat of destruction as the basis for increasing liberal expenditure in government.
Huxley was instrumental in the development of science and education for the public. His skill in illustration made biology something that wasn't just an exercise in the technical use of language.
His exploration of the relation between morality and science was directed toward the conscience of each individual with respect for the influence of natural law on behavior. He waxed too Roman in this regard.
When the law of nature is defined as a matter of selection by aggression, the governing body makes precipitation of profit from violent conflict the 'will of the people.' The consideration of using boundaries for security is minimized to favor invasion by the military or covert agency for insurrection against foreign government.
Thomas Huxley
S. 托马斯赫胥黎
T. 托馬斯赫胥黎
托 Tuo rest 托 taku pretend To と- ト- To 토 sat
马 ma horse 馬 ba horse ma ま マ ma 마 hemp
斯 si this 斯 shi this su す ス seu 스 switch
赫 He radiant 赫 kaku brighten Ha は ハ Heog 헉 ugh
胥 xu store 胥 sho together ku く ク seul 슬 the
黎 li many 黎 rei dark su す ス li 리 lee
ri り- リ-
----------------------------
Pretend pre-dawn is light though dark
to watch your mind define the start.
====================
Wiki
Quotes
Berkeley history
IEP: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Lord Christ the Son of God
Martin Luther favored reformation without rebellion.
There is a need to reform the legal code conservatively. The code used to include cruelty in punishment for 'correction.' The code in the Constitution allows support for invasion or insurrection for the profit of state officials. The current policy with respect for immigration at the national level fosters illegal immigration.
J.S. Bach - Lord Christ the Son of God
--------------------------
The German Reformation did not explicitly refer to the Christ as Jesus in documents for state officials.
Martin Luther favored reformation without rebellion. The content of the song of Mary, the Magnificat, made explicit reference to the Mighty being thrown down from their thrones by the power of God.
Even though Judas was the disciple who complained about charity for the poor to criticize the veneration of Jesus as King, there has been a pronounced tendency in Roman political belief to use the existence of poor people to instigate rebellion against conservative policy in government.
The lack of explicit association between Jesus and Christ was to keep the Protestant reformation modern with the use of discovery with the scientific method. The reform of the legal code had yet to be advocated with respect to conservative reform.
The German Reformation allowed for liberal expenditure in the promotion of the science of natural law without respect for the critical evaluation of the definition for natural law as it applied to economy in government expenditure. A similar tendency is evident in the British Reformation. The Vatican itself had reformed Church and state government for their property in Rome.
When invasion and the promotion of insurrection against foreign government is entertained as natural to official policy, people are taxed to reduce our own rights. There is a need to reform the legal code and policy associated with it conservatively.
