Showing posts with label consequence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consequence. Show all posts

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Order

1.26.20


Rosamund Pike


Order
Thought
订单思想
Dìngdān sīxiǎng
注文思考
Chūmon shikō
ps119.97+
Ordinis thought

The Father spoke the elements with material elation.
The Word put them together in the act of creation.

Logic is drawn from language with the art of reason.
It is the means of expression for the particular season.

What is the name for this season now?
Winter shivers when cold is sensibly endowed.

The art of division separates thought 
from emotions that have nought.

Animals are prompted to action by impulse with instinct.
A person is directed to act by judgement that isn't too instant.

Self-preservation is common to both
but the human entertains production for economic growth.

How I love 
the sight of the dove!

The flight in the light 
represents spiritual delight.

When darkness had threatened the memory of the past
the wings of the dove signaled remembrance of strength that will last.

Water is necessary to drink, cook and clean.
It is essentially good for health and hygiene.

Various arts are devoted to the performance of action
with the order of readiness to display interaction.

Entertainment produces action for a desirable effect
to impress the audience with the desired intent.

Art has procedure established by reason.
Happiness varies with time in the season.

How I love law for constancy and variance.
It is constant against acts that damage in variants.
It allows for variance in empirical experience.

Reason directs action from the lower powers
but it also reflects on itself with respect for the hour.

Logic and grammar form the base for rhetoric.
These are the elements of thought that reverence relevance.

The order of letters identify the word as a unit.
Spelling precedes grammar in language that is human.

The art of production enables the performance of manual acts
in the easiest way that thought can enact.

Reason had reasoned about manual acts
to create a product that expresses consensual craft.

Art is necessary to direct the act of apprehension
so the action can gain traction for production by selection.

Logic is the name for the craft in this art.
The order of thought communicates ideas at least in part. 

The order of nature is a concern in this craft.
It is design that produces duty that isn't just a fast draft cast to last.

Reflection on the commandments made me wiser for what's true 
than I would have been had I not used the law as a cipher for the newly renewed.

That which was savage in the expression of the elements 
had 'made' me act in a way that wasn't civil or relevant.

My enemies work to push me back to that state
that often enough sounded like an expression of hate.

Logic is an art in the science of reason.
It is ordered for meaning in the action needed.

It was a beacon of light 
when darkness darkened sight.



This darkness was rebellion against authority
whether it came from the majority or minority.


The land of Zebulun and Naphtali had fallen into contempt
but from this curse they would ascend.

Each home struggled with the call to unity
in defense of tribal land as part of a larger community.

They had allied with a planned rebellion
that turned the land into a dwelling place for hellions.

Darkness had obscured faith in the Light
as the means by which people came to sight.

The best end was hidden by the brightness.
It could be discerned by diligent forthrightness.

They rejoice before you as with the joy of harvest
but by your faith you will reach the farthest.


Rod of Asclepius

Reason is structured to communicate ideas on design
when these fix agreement like the rod of Asclepius divined.

Logic is the art of arts
that directs production from any start.

The parts of diversity are ordered for unity
to guide the union to organize community.

The first act of reason is the recognition of the unit.
A thing exists as it is and is as illumined. 
Recognition of the unit is like song is to music.

The thing that exists is represented by an idea in the memory.
The representation is a reflection of a fact that is sensory.

The second operation is combination or division.
Truth or falsity are present in the interpretation of the mission
for the admission of what is right about this vision.

Subtraction is the reverse of addition.
Multiplication is the inverse of division.

I have more understanding of knowledge than the vitriol from my haters
because the acts of reason lift me above the insults from those anti-negotiators.

I can move from one thing to another grown
when the unknown becomes known 
by knowledge drawn from other sources shown.

The order for the comprehension of representation
is drawn from the recognition of units in combination.

My study has made me wiser than the experience of my years
because I have observed instruction from God's law extend beyond the fears
and tears drawn from the weird.

I restrain my action from evil
that I may keep my word intact in the legal.

I do not shrink from judgment by reason
because I was taught to judge with reasonable adhesion.

Unity in things essential is more important
than disagreement as the constant content in portent.

Has Christ been divided?
Such a view is misguided.

Is the name of your baptist the main concern for faith?
Baptism is the initiation that helps you to learn to deal with natural pain.

The gospel is the means by which to grow in Christ.
By this our unity is defined as essentially undivided.

Divine energy is sweet to my taste.
It is a product of experiential or literary grace.

I gained understanding from the experience of what is right
by direction from the commandments of God in law with insight.

The struggle to find truth with combination or division
continues with participation in the heavenly vision.

The administration of agriculture was named Galilee.
The corridor of land extended from the smaller to the larger sea.

Like the transcendence of Jacob by Israel
the law of the land was for the unity of the legally real.

The people who toiled in darkness
were shown a great light that would not disarm us.

John had stated, 'Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.'
Jesus declared the same message without asceticism implied by demand.

Peter, Andrew, James and John were fishermen by trade.
They left their nets to become fishers of men by Jesus made.

The Word provides a light for my feet.
Illumination in the dark is what I need
to believe, breath and see what I seek.

There is light enough to avoid snakes
or bad luck from mischief or mistakes.  

I have sworn and am determined 
to keep the rightness of the judgments illumined.

When I am deeply troubled
I ask for help to avoid the trouble doubled. 

The testimony from my lips has been accepted
as willing tribute for what is divine and not neglected.

Responsibility is organized for safety
with security as a measure for the stately.

Traps have been laid for me by the immoral
but I have not been deterred by their quarrel.

The promise of salvation is my inheritance. 
It is my support against conflict, adversity and insensate chance.

I have applied my heart to fulfill the divine statutes
by the application of principles for duty I can use.

I hate it when my mistake does me harm.
I love the rules that keep me armed for charm.

You are the safety that secures my refuge
My hope is in the word that will be used. 

I will not act on the impulse to cause harm
yet I will defend myself from attack that is so armed.

Sustain me with the shelter of your promise
that my hope will remain august and honest.

Hold me in safety with the length and strength of security
and I will delight in what's right in law beyond my maturity.

Consequence results from action in the world.
Deceitfulness adds dissonance to the consequential blur.

Reward for rightness or loss for the wrong
is consequence that judgment can discern to grow strong. 

Those who deny consequence for their action 
lose the sense of true consonance for their faction.

My flesh trembles with fear for salvation.
I fear the loss of benefit for the nation.

The Spirit soars
when love adores.

-----------------------

Psalm 119
Mem
13th letter
Water
Quomodo dilexi!
How I love!

97 Oh, how I love your law!
all the day long it is in my mind.
98 Your commandment has made me wiser than my enemies,
and it is always with me.
99 I have more understanding than all my teachers,
for your decrees are my study.
100 I am wiser than the elders,
because I observe your commandments.
101 I restrain my feet from every evil way,
that I may keep your word.
102 I do not shrink from your judgments,
because you yourself have taught me.
103 How sweet are your words to my taste!
they are sweeter than honey to my mouth.
104 Through your commandments I gain understanding;
therefore I hate every lying way.

Nun
14th letter
Snake
Lucerna pedibus meis
My feet

105 Your word is a lantern to my feet
and a light upon my path.
106 I have sworn and am determined
to keep your righteous judgments.
107 I am deeply troubled;
preserve my life, O Lord, according to your word.
108 Accept, O Lord, the willing tribute of my lips,
and teach me your judgments.
109 My life is always in my hand,
yet I do not forget your law.
110 The wicked have set a trap for me,
but I have not strayed from your commandments.
111 Your decrees are my inheritance for ever;
truly, they are the joy of my heart.
112 I have applied my heart to fulfill your statutes
for ever and to the end.


Samekh
15th letter
Support
Iniquos odio habui
I hate

113 I hate those who have a divided heart,
but your law do I love.
114 You are my refuge and shield;
my hope is in your word.
115 Away from me, you wicked!
I will keep the commandments of my God.
116 Sustain me according to your promise, that I may live,
and let me not be disappointed in my hope.
117 Hold me up, and I shall be safe,
and my delight shall be ever in your statutes.
118 You spurn all who stray from your statutes;
their deceitfulness is in vain.
119 In your sight all the wicked of the earth are but dross;
therefore I love your decrees.
120 My flesh trembles with dread of you;
I am afraid of your judgments.

--------------------
===============
--------------------

Psalm 119
13th, 14th and 15th letters

Mem
Water

Mem is the 13th letter in the Semitic abjads. These include the Hebrew mēm מ, Aramaic Mem, Syriac mīm ܡܡ, Arabic mīm م and Phoenician mēm.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek mu (ج), Etruscan M, Latin M and Cyrillic ج.

It is believed that the Phoenician word for “water”, mem (Phoenician mem.png) is a morphed and simplified Egyptian hieroglyphic symbol for water.

Mem, like Kaph, Nun, Pe, and Tzadi, has a final form that is used at the end of words. The shape is changed from מ to ם.

The letter is King over Water, Formed Earth in the Universe, Cold in the Year, and the Belly in the Soul in  the Sefer Yetzirah. The Sefer Yetzirah is the title of the earliest extant book on Jewish mysticism.

Some early commentators treated it as a treatise on mathematical and linguistic theory as opposed to Kabbalah. Yetzirah is more literally translated as "Formation"; the word Briah is used for "Creation".

The letter is associated with The Hanged Man (Atu XII), the element of water and the path between Geburah and Hod on the Tree of Life in Tarot cards.

The card for the Hanged Man shows  an image of a man being hung upside-down by one ankle. This method of hanging was a common punishment at the time for traitors in Italy. The solemn expression on his face suggests that he is there by his own accord.

The card is meant to represent self-sacrifice as opposed to corporal punishment for criminality. It means the person having the cards read can choose to correct himself to avoid the imposition of being corrected by others.

Gevurah is "the essence of judgment and limitation". It corresponds to awe and the element of fire.
Hod is explained as an analogy. One overcomes or submits to an obstacle in oneself instead of "conquering" some thing in one's way (Netzach).

Nun
Snake

Nun is the 14th letter of the Semitic abjads. These include the Phoenician Nūn, Hebrew Nun נ, Aramaic Nun, Syriac Nūn ܢܢ, and Arabic Nūn ن.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek nu (ح), Etruscan N, Latin N, and Cyrillic ح.

Nun is believed to be derived from an Egyptian hieroglyph of a snake. The Hebrew word for snake, nachash begins with a Nun and snake in Aramaic is nun. Nūn means large fish or whale in Arabic.
Naḥs in modern Arabic literally means "bad luck".

A rolled Nun passes play to the next player with no other action in the game of dreidel. A dreidel is a four-sided spinning top used to play the game with the same name during the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah.

Each side of the dreidel bears a letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The letters are  נ (nun), ג (gimel), ה (hei) and ש (shin).

These letters are translated in Yiddish to a mnemonic for the rules of a gambling game played with the dreidel. Nun stands for the Yiddish word nisht ("nothing"), Gimel for gants ("all"), Hei for halb ("half") and Shin for shtel ayn ("put in").

Together they represent the Hebrew phrase nes gadol hayah sham ("a great miracle happened there"). The statement refers to the Miracle of the cruse of oil.

The story of the miracle occurred after the liberation of the Temple in Jerusalem during the Maccabean Revolt as described in the Talmud. A  jug of pure oil that was to be enough to light the lamp for one day lasted for eight days.

Samekh
Support

Samekh is the 15th letter in the Semitic abjads. These include the Phoenician sāmek 𐤎‎ ; Hebrew samekh סָמֶךְ and Syriac semkaṯ.

The letter has no continuant in the Arabic alphabet, its numerical value is taken by Arabic Šīn.
The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek xi (خ).

The archaic "grid" shape of Western Greek xi (Greek Xi archaic grid.svg) was adopted in the early Etruscan alphabet (𐌎 esh), but was never included in the Latin alphabet.

The Phoenician letter may continue a glyph from the Middle Bronze Age alphabets. It is either based on a hieroglyph for a tent peg or a support. It may possibly be the djed "pillar" hieroglyph.

-----------------------

Bring the bull before the entrance of the tent. Aaron and his sons shall lay (samkh) their hands on the head of the bull. (Exo. 29:10)

 -----------------------

The act of laying on hands was used to consecrate a priest for service or an animal for sacrifice in a blood ritual.

The apostles combined the action with prayer for the restoration of good health.

-----------------------

What is the name for this season?
Winter.

Chn.  这个季节叫什么名字?
            Zhטge jלjiי jiאo shיnme mםngzל?
           冬季。
            Dōngjל.
Jpn.    今シーズンの名前は何ですか?
             Kon shīzun no namae wa nanidesu ka?
             冬。
             Fuyu.
Krn.    이번 시즌의 이름은 무엇입니까?
             ibeon sijeun-ui ileum-eun mueos-ibnikka?
             겨울.
             gyeoul.
Ltn.     Quod nomen hoc tempore
             Hiems.
Itln.     Qual ט il nome per questa stagione? Inverno.
Spn.     ¿Cףmo se llama esta temporada? Invierno.
Frn.      Quel est le nom de cette saison? Hiver.
Gmn.    Wie heit die Saison? Winter.
Dtch.     Wat is de naam voor dit seizoen? Winter.
Czch.     Jak se jmenuje tato sezףna? Zimnם.
Hngn.    Mi a neve ennek a szezonnak? Tיli.
Trk.         Bu sezonun adı nedir? Kış.
Grk.        Ποιο είναι το όνομα αυτής της σεζόν; Χειμώνας.
                Poio eםnai to ףnoma aftםs tis sezףn? Cheimףnas.     
Rsn.      Как называется этот сезон? Зима.
               Kak nazyvayetsya etot sezon? Zima.

-------------------

Isaiah 9:2



Map of 12 Tribes of Israel



Zebulun was the sixth son of Jacob and Leah. The name translates as 'home.' It was ascribed to one of the twelve tribes of Israel. It was to become one of the ten lost tribes at the time of Isaiah.

Joshua allocated the land among the twelve tribes after the conquest of Canaan according to the book ascribed to his name.

Zebulun was allocated the territory at the southern end of the Galilee. The eastern border was the small sea. The western border was the Mediterranean. The south was bordered by the Tribe of Issachar. The north had Asher on the western side and Naphtali on the eastern.

Zebulun is described as sending to the battle those that handle the "sopher shebet" in the ancient Song of Deborah. The "rod of the scribe" was a stylus of wood or metal used to inscribe clay tablets or to write on papyrus. It was depicted in certain Assyrian monuments.

Those who wielded it would have been the associates of lawgivers. The tribe was considered to have a symbiotic relationship with Issachar. Issachar was the tribe that traditionally was seen as having many scholars according to Jewish tradition.

Zebulun financially supported Issachar's devotion to the study and teaching of the Torah in exchange for a share of the spiritual reward from such research. The terms Issachar and Zebulun came to be used by Jews for anyone engaged in such a relationship.

The Revised Standard Version rendered the description in the Song of Deborah of the people sent to battle by Zebulun as "those who handle the marshal's staff". They weren't the scholars. They sent officials as officers.

Naphtali was one of the northernmost of the twelve tribes. The name means "my struggle." Joshua assigned Naphtali the eastern side of the Galilee according to the Bible. This region held the highly fertile plain of Gennesaret. Josephus had called the area the pride of nature.

The tribe produced farmers and fighters. Militarism was celebrated in Naphtali's history.
Ahaz, king of Judah, had appealed to Tiglath-Pileser III, the king of Assyria, for help c. 732 BCE.

Tiglath-Pileser sacked Damascus and Israel. He annexed Aram and a large part of Israel, "including all the land of Naphtali." The people were not allowed to have a king from their tribes.

Chapter 9 in the Book of Isaiah is a continuation of the prophecy started in Ch. 7 and continued in Ch. 8. It is composed of mingled threats and promises. Its characteristic may be said to be "rays of light thrown into the midst of shades."

It promises comfort and deliverance at the same time it denounces the sins of the nation. The anger of the Lord had not been turned away. The previous chapter had closed by describing a time of general calamity and darkness.

This begins Isa 9:1-4 by showing that the calamity would not be so great as in former times. It would be mitigated. There would be light, particularly in the dark regions of Zebulun and Naphtali.

--------------------

Isaiah 9:1-3

There will be no gloom for those who were in anguish. He brought into contempt the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali in the former time, but he will make glorious the way of the sea, the land beyond the Jordan, Galilee of the nations in the latter time.

The people who lived in a land of deep darkness--
on them light has shined.
You have multiplied the nation.
You have increased its joy.
They rejoice before you
as with joy at the harvest
as people exult when dividing plunder.

--------------------

The land of Zebulun and Naphtali had fallen into contempt
but from this curse they would ascend.

Each home struggled with the call to unity
in defense of tribal land as part of a larger community.

They had allied with a planned rebellion
that turned the land into a dwelling for hellions.

Darkness had obscured faith in the Light
as the means by which people came to sight.

The best end was hidden by the brightness.
It could be discerned by diligent forthrightness.

They rejoice before you as with the joy of harvest
but by your faith you will reach the farthest.

===============

Unity in Faith


Corinth was a classically cosmopolitan Greco-Roman city.

Its location by the sea made it accessible to other cultures. Poseidon was the chief god, but there were temples for Demeter, Octavia, Apollo, Hermes, Isis, Venus-Fortuna and Aphrodite.

The temple of Aphrodite on the Acrocorinth was reputed to have temple prostitution.
Competition for reputation was based on the claim to fame by association with a name.

Ecstatic experience was associated with religion. Too much thought might lead to the consideration of measure. Measure could be used to test for certain claims to fame, but there was always something about a cult that transcended investigation by experiment.

It was the experience of ecstasy that defied and defined Apollonian excess in measured existence.

T.S. Eliot expressed the WWII form of cosmopolitan consciousness in his poem The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.  The excess of measure was reduced to a physical household act when Prufrock declared:

I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;
I know the voices dying with a dying fall
Beneath the music from a farther room.
So how should I presume?

Competition is regarded as a beneficial part of nature insofar as it helps sensory perception focus on key elements in the production of a service. Too much competition however is divisive. It can result in enslavement to 'victory' as a form of idolatry.

The introduction to the first letter to the Corinthians renounced that which is wrong with the claim to authority by association with a name.

The new religious form for monotheism was looking like it would simply transfer the conflict between the gods to that between humans.

The author later referred to a letter that he had written earlier (1 Corinth. 5:9). He had explained that mixture with the immoral could corrupt the resurrected life in Christ.

His advice was, "Don't mix with the immoral." This may have been a major theme in the first letter.

The unity of the faith was to be found in Jesus as Christ. The preservation of the forward movement of society in the monotheistic form was expressed in the symbolic death of false gods in Christ crucified on the cross.

The same problem that had existed before the establishment of the church threatened to manifest in a different guise. Who baptized whom was packaged as the new competition. This also was all too human.

The anthropomorphism of the gods had the societal value for drawing attention to the unique frame for time with respect for the movement of the planets and stars. This uniqueness found expression in the immorality of divine beings.

This was not good insofar as it encouraged vice through stories about violence in aggression or cruelty in punishment.

Paul knew that the message of Christ crucified would not appeal to the wisdom of the world, but he felt that the church had to have a government that was directed toward societal benefit in advancement by faith in the love of God.

He downplayed his own leadership in terms of baptism in order to emphasize the value of the gospel for the Church and the larger society outside the community. The loyalty of believers was directed to the name of Jesus as the Author of salvation for the faith.

1 Corinth. 1:10-17

I appeal to you by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that all of you should be in agreement. There should be no divisions among you. You should be united in the same mind and the same purpose.

It has been reported to me by Chloe's people that there are quarrels among you. What I mean is that each of you says, "I belong to Paul', 'I belong to Apollos', 'I belong to Cephas' or 'I belong to Christ.'

Has Christ been divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul?
I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius. No one can say that you were baptized in my name. (I did baptize the household of Stephanas also. I don't know if I baptized anyone else beyond that.)

Christ did not send me to baptize, but to proclaim the gospel.

--------------------

Unity in things essential was more important
than disagreement as the constant content in portent.

Has Christ been divided?
Such a view is misguided.

Is the name of your baptist the main concern for our faith?
Baptism is the initiation that helps you to learn to deal with natural pain.

The gospel is the means by which to grow in Christ.
By this our unity is defined as essentially undivided.

===============

Upper and Lower Galilee


The area occupied by the tribes of Zebulun and Naphtali would become Lower and Upper Galilee by the time of the Roman occupation.

The fertility of the upper region made the land a symbol for cross-cultural development. The administrative function for Zebulun combined with the struggle to produce food from the land that had to be defended for the production of Naphtali. The union of administration with agricultural labor represented sustenance with the ability to increase production.

The cultivation of the darkness of the earth in the light of day was an expression of promise.

Matt. 4:12-23

When Jesus heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew to Galilee. He left Nazareth and made his home in Capernaum by the lake in the territory of Zebulun and Napthtali, so what had been spoken through the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled:

'Land of Zebulun, land of Naphtali,
on the road by the sea across the Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles--
the people who sat in darkness
have seen a great light.
Light has dawned
for those who sat in the region of shadow and death.'

Jesus began to proclaim from that time, 'Repent for the kingdom of heaven has come near.'

He saw two brothers as he walked by the Sea of Galilee. Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew, his brother, were casting a net into the lake for they were fishermen. He said to them, 'Follow me and I will make you fishers for men.' They left their nets and followed him immediately.

He saw two other brothers as he went from there. James son of Zebedee and his brother John were in the boat with their father Zebedee mending their nets. He called them. They left the boat with their father and followed him.

--------------------

The Land of Zebulun and Naphtali
was a corridor that extended from the sea of Galilee.

Like the transcendence of Jacob by Israel
the law of the land was for the unity of the legally real.

The people who toiled in darkness
were shown a great light that would not disarm us.

John had stated, 'Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.'
Jesus declared the same message without asceticism implied by demand.

Peter, Andrew, James and John were fishermen by trade.
They left their nets to become fishers of men by Jesus made.

===============

Truth



When Thomas Aquinas lived in the 13th century the works of  Aristotle had largely been forgotten in Western Europe.  These works started to become available again partly from Eastern European sources and partly from Muslim Arab sources.

The Muslims in Africa had most likely received translations from the Middle East and passed them into Europe through their occupation of Spain.

These works offered an exciting new way of looking at the world. The logic of Aristotle considered what a number of sources had to say, but unlike the Socrates in Plato's dialogs, he didn't use logic as a means to eliminate explicit agreement.

His dialectic reason offered the expansion of the capacity to look at virtually anything from the first person perspective to develop a philosophy that allowed for metaphysics.

Metaphysics was important in Greek and Roman exposition because it allowed for the relevance of observation by an observer. The focus was not just on the definition of order in nature as something that was outside of the human perspective.

There were  students of Aristotle that adopted him as as an alternative to Christianity. Others used his political philsophy as the means to justify slavery as the means to expand 'civilization.'

Christians who had been influenced by the anti-pagan legislation of Byzantine Romans defined Aristotle and Plato as enemies of the faith.

Thomas Aquinas was an example of the kind who used knowledge of scripture to consider the analysis of Aristotle's classical perspective to criticize the Islamic influence on European culture. It was felt that Islam was an incursion in Europe.

Aquinas was like the Muslims who had translated Aristotle's work in that he undertook to explain Christian ideas and beliefs in language that would make sense to disciples of Aristotle.

Aristotle's analytics were not as restricted to the control of a city state by a king or a despot as was the political philosophy of Plato.

His a posteriori analytics made it into the historical analysis of the history of Rome without explicit reference to his work. A number of patricians were inclined to see him as too imperial for their sense of republic.

This analytical approach was still radical in the time of Aquinas. Given the threat of exclusion or punishment represented by the Inquisition he lived on the edge of ecclesiastical approval.

His success can be measured by the prevalence of the notion that Christian scholars in the Middle Ages informed reason for faith with the work of Aristotle as a scholastic effort.

The insistence of Aquinas that logical argument must be prepared to meet argument from other scholars on their own ground to become familiar with the oppositional view. A logician can argue for his position from their premises. This technique has been a permanent and valuable contribution to Christian thought.   

The socialist position as derived from Marx has expressed the asceticism of the Christian religion as a means to convert the unconverted. The Christian logician can argue that though socialism is anti-religious, it doesn't prove that Christianity is false.

It can be asserted that the popularity of Marx is dependent upon the condemnation of capitalism by the demands of labor as supported by officials in government who are working for their bureaucratic power over the private sector.

The socialist position essentially reduces the existence of management, the middle class, the wealthy and Christianity to things that are in the way of the proletariat. It is a degenerative advocacy in the development of civilized society. It was the replacement ideology for slavery. 

Plato


Thomas Aquinas on Posterior Analytics

Posterior analytics is the study of patterns in analysis that retains consistency with the logical description of reality. It is about the experience of education with reason.

Physics is the study of nature. This study includes the description of forces that change things in the physical world. Change doesn't happen unless it is caused.

This study describes how things would work in nature without the observation of the observer. It is purely physical in terms of mechanical operations of matter and energy in space.

Metaphysics is concerned with first causes and the principles for how things work. It is derived from physics, but it is about that which is greater than the mechanical materialism in purely physical operations.

Free will is the expression of choice that seeks to order the randomness that occurs in the regular course of events to organize a structure that will result in a beneficial outcome.

How is it that we are to work the elements of chance to result in a desired benefit? Can we work to make luck produce good fortune?

Aristotle wrote in his Metaphysics, (980b26), “the human race lives by art and reason." The art of reason distinguishes humankind from other animals. Animals are prompted to action by instinct and impulse. A person is directed to act by judgment with reason.

Various arts are devoted to the ready and orderly performance of human action. An art is a definite and fixed procedure established by choice that produces a desirable effect.

Reason not only directs the action of lower powers, it selects its own direction for action. That which is particular to intellect is the ability to reflect upon itself. Intellect knows itself.

Reason is able to reason about its own operation.

The art of construction or production enables anyone capable to perform manual acts in an easy and orderly manner. This was thought that had reasoned about manual acts.

An art is needed to direct the act of communication, so the act of reasoning might proceed in an orderly and easy manner with the hope of producing a product with a benign purpose.

This art is logic. It is the science for reason with language. Logic is concerned with order for the meaning of expression in the act of organizing thought. Reason concerns itself with its proper matter, the ability to communicate ideas.

It is the art of the arts, because it directs us in order for the acts from which all arts proceed. The parts of logic are to be viewed according to diversity for the order of unity.

There are three acts of reason. The first two belong to the intellect. One action of the mind is the understanding of the unity of a simple thing.

It conceives what a thing is as it exists according to this action. This operation is called representation. Aristotle explained this in his book on Categories.

The second operation of the intellect is combination or division. The true or the false are present in this operation. Aristotle recorded his observations on this in the book entitled On Interpretation.

The third act is concerned with that which is unique to reason. This is the means by which to advance from one thing to another in such a way that through that which is known someone comes to a knowledge of the unknown.

This order for the comprehension of meaning with the structure for reason is considered in the remaining books of logic.

Text: Posterior Analytics I, Thomas Aquinas
Text: Posterior Analytics II, Thomas Aquinas

Brennan


Education has to have a reasonable means to test for comprehension with respect for age and grade level.

It is necessary to build the strength of student memory with instruction that starts with vocabulary and ends with student application in written expression.

Word recognition requires the correct order of letters that is given in the instruction of how to spell. Definition has to be given so the meaning of the word is recognizable.

The memory of definition has to be strengthened with repetition in the context of different contextual sets. There are different word games that allow for this action. Students can break down one word to make different words for review. They can play hangman to guess the spelling for a word based on the number of letters.

Variability in context allows the student to see that choice is an element of reason in the expression with words with the intent to communicate an idea.

Wordsearch facilitates word recognition.  Crossword puzzles, matching and fill in the blank games provide different contexts to strengthen the memory of the definition.

Verbal debates on a topic that includes the words being studied develops skill in verbal expression.
Around the World helps students to move around the room when the definition is remembered correctly.

Certain games lend a sense of order to the composition of tests to assess for retention. Matching the definition with the word can be combined with filling in the blank or multiple choice contests.

Short essays can be used until students have developed the capacity to express argument to defend an opinion.

The science of logic can be developed in an orderly and beneficial way for student achievement.

Is Republic in or with the Monarchy?


Federalist Paper #5

Anne was Queen of England, Scotland and Ireland between 8 March 1702 and 1 May 1707. She had been born in the reign of Charles II to his younger brother and heir presumptive, James II.

The House of Stuarts was suspected of Roman Catholicism. Charles had Anne and her older sister Mary raised as Anglicans for this reason.

Mary married William III of Orange. Orange was a province in southern France, but he was also a Stadtholder of Holland. This made him part of the Dutch reform.

The Dutch leadership was more radical than the English or the German monarchy, because they had adopted republic as their form of government.  This made their affiliation with Calvin strong and their opposition to the agreement between Henry VIII and Martin Luther a political cause.

The monarchy was defined as corrupt due to the claim to the divine rights of kings. The divine right was interpreted as an assertion of absolute power.

The marriage of William and Mary saved the monarchy in England, Scotland and Ireland by virtue of William's association with the Dutch reform.

Mary's Anglican position was shifted to allow Calvinism even though they had instigated the Civil War and replaced the monarchy with the commonwealth.

Anne married Prince George of Denmark. He was from the House of Hanover. This made him acceptable to Protestants in Germany, Denmark, England and Scotland. The Danes had an alliance with the French.

The marriage was arranged by Charles II with the hope of joining the parliaments of England and Scotland.

Her father, James II, had appointed Roman Catholics to military and administrative posts in defiance of the Test Acts that prohibited the action. He also tried to persuade Anne to baptize her youngest daughter as a Catholic.

The opposition to Roman Catholicism wasn't sectarian. The papal office had claimed supremacy. The claim would not have aroused much opposition if it were purely titular.

Papal supremacy was claimed prior to the call to the Crusades and the institution of the Inquisition. It also came before the assertion of investiture and the policy of indulgences.

The office of the pope was asserting itself as the emperor in fact or the power that determined the emperor's actions. Henry VIII's concern regarding the royal line of succession was supported by his protest against the sovereignty of the state being divided.

The English Civil War demonstrated that a 'house divided against itself' could not stand. The alliance between the Anglicans and Calvinists was strengthened. Rhetoric against Roman Catholicism as a threat to sovereignty was allowed.

The Calvinists favored control of parliament by the House of Commons. They had used the argument that royalty was corrupt for the civil war and to take control of parliament, but allowed for the restoration of the monarchy with the alliance with the Dutch reform in the marriage of William and Mary. 

William and Mary had no children so Anne was elevated to Queen after William died in 1702.

The Acts of Union were instituted by the parliaments of England (1706) and Scotland (1707) to form Great Britain as a single state.

John Jay made reference to Anne's letter about the union in the 5th Federalist Paper.

His argument as Publius was directed to persuade the public to agree to the union of the states with a Constitution for the national republic as a modern state. Those who were opposed to the national union were inclined to propose a confederacy with 3 or 4 regional governments.

The divisions in the Seleucid empire would only be divided according to geographical convenience according to that historical model. Jay and Madison were favorably disposed to a hybrid between the commercial empire of the Phoenicians and the Roman variation on the same.

The one year term limit for the cursus honorum or course of honor was too rigorous to be regarded as practical given the modern experience of the administration of law by parliament in Europe.

The recommended requirement of education in law was to be more rigorous for election to the Senate. The smaller yet more stately body was to temper the lesser requirements for election to the House of Representatives to guard against the populist inclinations of democracy.

The Calvinists in England had called themselves Puritans because they hoped that the charge that the royalty was corrupt would unify the local councils in parliament for self-determination.

The Calvinists in Scotland identified themselves as Presbyterians because they wanted to emphasize the local church government was run by presbyters or elders. The elders agreed on policy that was given to the parish as theirs as well.

That which was agreed to be the case by the elders was expected to be agreed to by the vote of the congregation. The will of the people was determined by the elders and passed to the people for agreement.

We are best acquainted with the history of Great Britain by the convenience of knowing the English language. The limitation to a single language isn't as beneficial as a multi-lingual capacity, but the history of Great Britain offers a microcosm of European relations with each other through Rome.

Jay offered agreement with the value of empiricism when he asserted that we could profit from the experience of British unity without having to pay as much to find the way independently.

While common sense indicated that the three kingdoms should be united as one, history shows that they were divided for ages. There was a constancy of quarrels that contributed to the report of wars.

Anne was born in England from a Scottish dynasty. When she spoke of her nationality she identified herself as English. It was a choice as well as a condition of birth. When she persuaded Scotland to join the union, she wrote about being joined in affection for protection against the animosities promoted by foreigners as enemies. 

Mutual jealousies were perpetually kept inflamed when the kingdoms were not united. The seperate states were more meddlesome than useful to each other.

Regional nations in America would invite the same kind of difficulties in the conflicts with bordering states and foreign powers.

It could not  be presumed that the same degree of sound policy, prudence and foresight would uniformly be observed by each of these confederacies for a long succession of years.

The argument to retain the confederacy was treated as an argument for the retention of separate confederacies. If the government did not have national security as a chief purpose for union, agreement for a confederate army would not be as strong.

The American government has not as yet legislated approval for a standing military. The existence of military bases on foreign soil is a major justification for the support for that which is supported by the government in practice.

Jay identified the North as the region of strength. The militia that had been raised for the Revolutionary War would come to be raised again for the Civil War. This was due in no small part to the classification of residents as citizens. Males could vote and own property at the time.

Jay would eventually lead the movement in New York to abolish slavery. Voting by former slaves was subject to populist contrivance at local levels. The national government would not recognize the right for African American males to vote until the 15th amendment was ratified in 1870.

He argued that the strength of the northern hive would come to excite the same ideas and sensations in the more southern parts of America which it formerly did in the southern parts of Europe.

He wrote that it would not be a rash conjecture to predict that its young swarms might often be tempted to gather honey in the more blooming fields and milder air of their luxurious and more delicate neighbors.

The harshness of the winter climate was used to anticipate the behavioral tendencies of those who would come to be called the 'carpetbaggers' of the Reconstruction period from the north.

Had these regional trends been left to form in confederacies it would not be reasonable to assume that alliance could have been organized for the combination and union of wills of arms and of resources necessary to put and keep them in a formidable state of defense against foreign enemies.

When did the independent states into which Britain and Spain were formerly divided combine in such alliance to unite their forces against a foreign enemy?

It was the divisions in Spain that allowed for the Muslim incursion. The inquisition was instituted after the Muslim occupation was overthrown as an act of overcompensation.

It was likely that the foreign nation with whom the southern confederacy might be at war would be the one with whom the northern confederacy would be the most desirous of preserving peace and friendship.

An alliance contrary to their immediate interest would not be easy to form. It would be more natural for these confederacies to apprehend danger from one another than from distant nations considering the distance from Europe.

Each of them should be more desirous to guard against the others by the aid of foreign alliances, than to guard against foreign dangers by alliances between themselves. It would be easier to receive foreign fleets into our ports and foreign armies into our country, than it is to persuade or compel them to depart.

Let candid judgment determine whether the division of America into any given number of independent sovereignties would secure us against the hostilities and improper interference of foreign nations.

Calvinism as a religious form was against monarchy in general. Locke made it clear in his treatise on civil government that the parts of the bible that favored monarchy were to be treated as history. The analytical philosophy of Aristotle allowed for the interpretation of the bible with respect for democracy.

The orientation allowed for local prejudice as the determinant force in law. The presumption of prejudice has since come to be used by populist socialism as a means to enforce national prejudice as a correction.

The national prejudice assumes that the majority is at fault for racism, sexism or capitalism. The majority then is overcorrected for the reelection of populists in Congress. These same 'representatives' favor the impeachment of the president on the basis that the office must have won the election by corruption.

The charges of abuse of power and the obstruction of Congress were made for the benefit of the state officials who made the charges. They were not formed with probable cause for investigation. The populists just want to see if the unsubstantiated formation of the charges for impeachment will win the popular vote.

Analytical philosophy also allows for the favorable interpretation of union. Union was described as stronger than division with respect for independence. The weakness of division would invite danger from foreign powers.

The royal family was tolerated in both England and Scotland at the time of the union as Great Britain. Queen Anne had argued for union on the basis that the agreement would provide protection from enemies.

The Acts of Union were enacted in 1707 to form Great Britain in anticipation of the larger union with the Irish kingdom in 1800.

Ireland became a republic with the institution of their constitution in 1937. Brexit presents another challenge to British unity insofar as there those who favor the European union over that of Britain.       
wiki Federalist Paper #5
Text: Federalist Paper #5

Logic
W.O. Quine

Sunday, January 5, 2020

Clean

1.12.19
Baptism


Gemma Arterton

Clean
Yourself
清洁自己
Qīngjié zìjǐ
自分をきれいに
Jibun o kirei ni
ps119.25+
Mundus Te

When I leave the door to pass the gate
I have organized my action to avoid being late.

I obey the law to drive with safety in the relative way
or walk on the sidewalk in the not just lately case for the day 
in the maybe baby of the stately frailness of the straight path sway.

My soul abhors the dust that clings to me.
I cleanse the perception of my perspective when I clean my body.

Where is the bathroom? I need to get clean. 
I won't feel right until my hygiene can be gleaned.

When I asked for guidance I was shown a hypothesis.
Divine design in nature has made me an investigator of consequence.

Help me to understand the precepts for Your order.
I will meditate on the effects without regret for respect for borders.

When my soul melts away in sorrow
I look to your word for strength to borrow.

Let me put false ways far from me
that I may teach your law graciously.

I have chosen the way of faithfulness.
I set your rules before me with gratefulness.

I cling to the testimonies of Your truth.
Let my investigation preserve my youth.

I will rely on the energy drawn from Your commandments
when Your enhancements are enacted as advancement.

It is clear that Your authority extends beyond the fence in the yard.
I will behave in a way that defends the sense of legal power on guard.

Give me understanding to keep Your law
that I may observe it for my heart drawn dawn.

Lead me on Your path
for I delight in doing the math.

Incline my heart to Your revelation
that I may discount unsubstantiated allegation.

Let me see the worth of things
in terms that actual value brings.

Confirm Your promise to Your servant
that You may be revered for the service.

I dread damage from reproach
for adherence to the rules that I feel that You coached. 

I long for the rightness 
that the precepts for divine justice
teaches for trust with me for us. 

A good question is like a hook for investigation.
Discovery provides another piece to the puzzle of salvation.

Let your love be shown as steadfast
that I may answer those who forget the past.

I hope the rules I find by faith in You
conform to the reality created as true.

God created the heavens.
It was stretched out as testimony to the divine essence.

The Creator spread out the earth.
Matter was given form in tribute to worth.

The LORD called you in righteousness.
The light of the covenant was give to enliven us.

The light can open eyes that are blind
to the truth that life is that which we can find.

Prisoners who sat in the darkness of doubt
will be brought to see that insight can be drawn out.

Praise will be directed to the One through the name of God.
The servant will be the Son who delivers us against the odds.

New things will be declared before they spring forth.
The past has come to pass in the directions south of north.

Non-Jews were in need of faith in one God.
The Greeks, the Romans and the Parthians were at odds.

Judah made progress with respect for national security
in the name of the crown for their growth in maturity.

There were those who were ranked as good by history.
They were gratefully faithful in the work to overcome adversity.

They managed defense with respect for the law.
They led the remnant that Isaiah's vision saw.



Faith in Christ was resurrected with Jesus in Galilee
after the baptism announced by John in the Jordan's perfect sensuality.

The heavens were opened. The dove descended.
The love of God was to the nations extended.

Jesus proclaimed love in Judea and Jerusalem as well.
The Apostles ate and drank with him before they witnessed the knell
on Golgotha's tell.

He was resurrected on the third day
to deliver the command to proclaim the good way
of forgiveness for sins in his name's sake.

The Apostles received the gift of the Holy Spirit
to speak the gospel in the language in which people could hear it.


They extended the message through the known world
insofar as their ability was increased by the challenges hurled. 


I will keep Your law forever
that I may serve You in each endeavor.

The search for wisdom will increase comprehension
of the role thought plays in the apprehension 
of sensation.

I will speak of participation in legal polity
in a way that improves moral quality.

I find my delight in the law which I love;
that is the reflection of Your design from above. 

I will lift up my hands for what is divine in Your design.
I will meditate on how Your statutes are benign.

----------------------

Dalet

Daleth
4th letter
Door or gate
Adhesit pavimento
Adhered to pavement

25  My soul clings to the dust;
give me life according to your word!
 26  When I told of my ways, you answered me;
teach me your statutes!
 27  Make me understand the way of your precepts,
and I will meditate on your wondrous works.
 28  My soul melts away for sorrow;
strengthen me according to your word!
 29  Put false ways far from me
and graciously teach me your law!
 30  I have chosen the way of faithfulness;
I set your rules before me.
 31  I cling to your testimonies, O Lord;
let me not be put to shame!
 32  I will run in the way of your commandments
when you enlarge my heart!

He

He
5th letter
Fence
Legem pone mihi
Set me

33  Teach me, O Lord, the way of your statutes;
and I will keep it to the end.
 34  Give me understanding, that I may keep your law
and observe it with my whole heart.
 35  Lead me in the path of your commandments,
for I delight in it.
 36  Incline my heart to your testimonies,
and not to selfish gain!
 37  Turn my eyes from looking at worthless things;
and give me life in your ways.
 38  Confirm to your servant your promise,
that you may be feared.
 39  Turn away the reproach that I dread,
for your rules are good.
 40  Behold, I long for your precepts;
in your righteousness give me life!

Vav


Waw
6th letter
Hook
Et veniat super me
Come to me
41  Let your steadfast love come to me, O Lord,
your salvation according to your promise;
 42  then shall I have an answer for him who taunts me,
for I trust in your word.
 43  And take not the word of truth utterly out of my mouth,
for my hope is in your rules.
 44  I will keep your law continually,
forever and ever,
 45  and I shall walk in a wide place,
for I have sought your precepts.
 46  I will also speak of your testimonies before kings
and shall not be put to shame,
 47  for I find my delight in your commandments,
which I love.
 48  I will lift up my hands toward your commandments, which I love,
and I will meditate on your statutes.

---------------------
===============
---------------------

Psalm 119:25-48

The Hebrew letters used in this section of the psalm are daleth, he and waw.
Dalet is the 4th letter in the Semitic abjads. The adjads include the  Phoenician Dālet, Hebrew 'Dālet ד, Aramaic Dālath, Syriac Dālaṯ ܕ, and Arabic Dāl د .

The letter is based on a glyph of the Middle Bronze Age Proto-Sinaitic alphabets. It is based on a hieroglyph depicting a door.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek delta (Δ), Latin D and the Cyrillic letter Д.

The letter dalet along with He is used to represent the Names of God in Judaism. The letter He is used commonly. The dalet is not used as much.

The keter (crown) of a tallit or prayer shawl has the name of God usually represented by a dalet. A reason for this is that He is used as an abbreviation for HaShem "The Name". The dalet is used as a non-sacred reference.

He is the 5th letter in the Seimitic abjads. These include the  Phoenician Hē, Hebrew Hē ה, Aramaic Hē, Syriac Hē ܗ, and Arabic Hāʾ ه.

Heth means fence in the Phoenician alphabet.

The proto-Canaanite letter gave rise to the Greek Epsilon, Etruscan E 𐌄, Latin E, ֻ and Ɛ and Cyrillic Е, Ё, Є and Э. He represented a consonant like all Phoenician letters, but the Latin, Greek and Cyrillic equivalents have all come to represent vowels.

Hei is an abbreviation for Hashem in Judaism. Hashem means "the Name." It is a way to speak about the name of God without saying the name for the deity.

Waw or vav is the 6th letter of the Semitic abjads. These include the Phoenician wāw, Aramaic waw, Hebrew vav ו, Syriac waw ܘ and Arabic wāw و .

It is the origin for the Greek Ϝ (digamma) and Υ (upsilon), Cyrillic У, Latin F and V and the derived "Latin" or "Roman" alphabet letters U, W, and Y.

The letter likely originated with an Egyptian hieroglyph which represented the word mace.
The word vav is used in modern Hebrew to mean  both "hook" and the letter's name.

https://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/treasury-of-david/psalms-119-25.html
https://www.studylight.org/commentary/psalms/119-25.html
https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/psalm-119/

-----------------

Where is the bathroom? I need to get clean.

Chn. 洗手间在哪里? 我要打扫
           Xǐshǒujiān zאi nǎlǐ? Wǒ yאo dǎsǎo
Jpn.  化粧室はどこですか。 きれいにする必要がある。
           Keshō-shitsu wa dokodesu ka? Kirei ni suru hitsuyō ga arimasu.
Krn.  화장실은 어디에 있습니까? 깨끗해야 해요.
           hwajangsil-eun eodie issseubnikka? kkaekkeushaeya haeyo.
Ltn.   Ubi est latrina? EGO postulo impetro mundus erit.
Itn.    Dov'ט il bagno? Ho bisogno di pulire.
Grk.   Πού είναι το μπάνιο? Πρέπει να καθαρίσω.
           Poת eםnai to bבnio? Prיpei na katharםso.
Spn.  ¿Dףnde estב el baסo? Necesito limpiarme.
Frn.   Oש se trouvent les toilettes? Je dois me nettoyer.
Gmn. Wo ist die Toilette? Ich muss sauber werden.
Dtch. Waar is het toilet? Ik moet schoon worden.
Hgn.   Hol van a frdץszoba? Meg kell tisztםtani.
Trk.    Banyo nerede? Temizlenmem gerek.
Rsn.   Где здесь ванная комната? Мне нужно очиститься.
            Gde zdes' vannaya komnata? Mne nuzhno ochistit'sya.           

Where is the bathroom? I need to get clean.
I won't feel right until my hygiene can be gleaned.

--------------------


Isa.42:5

Chapters 40-55 in the book of Isaiah are known as "Deutero-Isaiah". The chapters are dated from the time of the Israelites' exile in Babylon.

Chapter 42 contains a poem known as the first of the "Servant songs." Jewish tradition holds that Isaiah identifies the servant as either the Israelites themselves (Hebrew: אור לגויים, or l'goyim) or Cyrus.

The identification with Cyrus is contrasted with Jewish Christian and later gentile Christian tradition. Cyrus is not identified as the Suffering Servant by Islamic tradition either.

The idea of a 'servant' played a small part in the earlier chapters. It was used as a designation of the unworthy Eliakim in 22:20 and of the figure of David in 37:35.

It comes to the fore as a description of major significance in Second Isaiah. The noun is used more than 20 times in chs. 40-55.

Its first usage is obviously important in establishing the sense in which we are to understand it. Here it is clear that the community of Israel/Jacob is described.

The introduction to chapter 42 associates God with the LORD who created heaven and earth. The Creator gave breath and spirit to people. He has called those who believe to righteousness in the covenant.

The blessings of the call to agreement extend to the nations. Eyes that were 'blind' are opened. 'Prisoners' who sat in darkness are brought out to see the light.

Praise in the past was shaped in the stone or wood of idols. New things will be declared before they are seen in the new covenant.

Isaiah 42:5-9

Thus says God, the LORD,
who created the heavens and stretched them out,
who spread out the earth and what comes from it,
who gives breath to the people on it
and spirit to those who walk in it:

I am the LORD, I have called you in righteousness.
I have taken you by the hand and kept you.
I have given you as a covenant to the people,
a light to the nations,
to open the eyes that are blind,
to bring out the prisoners from the dungeon,
from the prison those who sit in darkness.

I am the LORD. That is my name.
My glory I give to no other
nor my praise to idols.
See, the former things have come to pass.
New things I now declare
before they spring forth
I tell you of them.

-----------------------

God created the heavens.
It was stretched out as testimony to the divine essence.

The Creator spread out the earth.
Matter was given form in tribute to worth.

The LORD called you in righteousness.
The light of the covenant was give to enliven us.

The light can open eyes that are blind
to the truth that value in life is that which we can find.

Prisoners who sat in the darkness of doubt
will be brought to see that insight can be drawn out.

Praise will be directed to the One through the name of God.
The servant will be the Son who delivers us against the odds.

New things will be declared before they spring forth.
The past has come to pass in the directions south of north.

=================

The Acts of the Apostles is addressed to Theophilus (God-lover). It is like the gospel of Luke in this regard.

Jesus charged  the Twelve Apostles with the mission to spread the Gospel throughout the world. Peter served as the leader of the apostles and the small congregation of the faithful in Jerusalem.  Matthias was elected to replace Judas Iscariot.

The Apostles and other followers of Jesus were gathered in the Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of Weeks (Shavuoth).

The feast marks the all-important wheat harvest in Israel (Exodus 34:22). It commemorates the anniversary of the day when God gave the Torah to the nation of Israel assembled at Mount Sinai.

Jesus had promised that his followers would receive the “gift” of tongues (Mark 16:17). “They shall speak with new tongues.” The word “new” speaks to a newness of quality. This gift would involve a fresh or new way of speaking, not a new kind of utterance unknown to mankind.

The fulfillment of the promise began on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2). These “tongues” were “languages” known to visitors to Jerusalem (Acts 2:2-11). “How hear we every man in our language wherein we were born?” (Acts 2:11).

The gift of tongues is the ability to speak a foreign language. The experience of communication has a religious or a miraculous quality when faith in God is communicated.

Peter preached the fear of God as a global universal. Those who act in accordance with what is right act in accord with the divine will. Legislation against criminal behavior allows for the non-criminal as good provided that it doesn't damage the property or physical safety of another's body.

God's will doesn't favor a particular group or language in an exclusive sense. The language of particular favor was addressed to Judah when it was the first to adopt monotheism as the form for the official religion.

The stories of polytheism were viewed as tribally divisive insofar as there were so many different deities who were in conflict with others based on immoral motives.

There was the sense that the immorality of the gods was an inducement for moral behavior in people, but the collateral damage in contrast to such an implied intent was prone to exponential escalation.

When morality is supposed to be extracted from a system of stories about gods with immoral behavior, it is easy to lose sight of the credibility in moral standards. If bad behavior is pereceived as the cause for societal success in civilization, how civilized is the society?

Religion can be critical of doctrine as related to practice, but it can't be sectarian particularly in an official capacity. Impartiality in practice defaults to the pragmatic proof of objective goodness in action with allowance for subjective flux in non-essential things.  Differences in custom are often conditioned by the historical development of the religion.

While there is a universal character to the promise of salvation with respect for the atonement offered by the sacrifice of the Son, there is an official purpose for religion with respect for the security of the nation.

Whether a state is a kingdom or a republic, the religion has to profess allegiance to the host country to retain legal status. A member cannot promote riot, terrorism, rebellion, revolution or world war and maintain a legally recognized status within the society.

The provision of sanctuary for criminals is not a requirement of the law.

Acts 10:34-43

Peter began to speak to them: 'I truly understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him. You know the message he sent to the people of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ--he is Lord of all. That message spread throughout Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John announced: how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power; how he went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil for God was with him. We are witnesses to all that he did both in Judea and in Jerusalem. They put him to death by hanging him on a tree; but God raised him on the third day and allowed him to appear, not to all the people but to us who were chosen by God as witnesses and who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one ordained by God as judge of the living and the dead. All prophets testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.'

-----------------------

Non-Jews were in need of faith in one God.
The Greeks, the Romans and the Parthians were at odds.

Judah made progress with respect for national security
in the name of the crown for their growth in maturity.

There were those who were ranked as good by history.
They were gratefully faithful in the work to overcome adversity.

They managed defense with respect for the law.
They led the remnant that Isaiah's vision saw.

Faith in Christ was resurrected with Jesus in Galilee
after the baptism announced by John in the Jordan's perfect sensuality.

Jesus proclaimed the love of God in Judea and Jerusalem as well.
The Apostles ate and drank with him before they witnessed the knell
on Golgotha's tell.

He was resurrected on the third day
to deliver the command to proclaim the good way
of forgiveness for sins in his name's sake.

=================

John the Baptist baptized in the Jordan River. Scholars think that he was influenced by the Essenes, who like John, were leading an ascetic life in the wilderness of Qumran or EnGedi. One of their principal religious rituals was a daily immersion in water to regain purity.

An annual ritual of purification had been practised by the Pharaoh in Egypt to encourage the people to bathe for hygiene. This rite had specific adaptations for application in Judaism before it became a daily practice.

The Jordan River represented a natural mikva with continuously running water. Baptism as a rite represented a passage from the primitive state of existence into membership in the first monotheistic state for society in the Middle East.

The archaeological sites discovered and the associated studies carried out recently show the remains of five churches uniquely designed and built since the 5th century as memorials of Jesus baptism.

Matt. 3: 13-17

Jesus came from Galilee to John at the Jordan to be baptized by him. John would have prevented him, saying, 'I need to be baptized by you and do you come to me?' Jesus answered him, 'Let it be so now. It is proper for us in this way to fulfill all righteousness.' Then he consented.

When Jesus had been baptized, just as he came up from the water, the heavens were opened to him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting on him. A voice from heaven said, 'This is by Son, the Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.'

-----------------------

Faith in Christ was resurrected with Jesus in Galilee
after the baptism announced by John in the Jordan's perfect sensuality.

=================

George Berkeley (Bar-clay) was the namesake of the city of Berkeley (Bur-kley), California, which is most famous as the home of the University of California.

Dust


George Berkeley (1685-1753)
Principles of Human Knowledge (1710)

Berkeley argued that knowledge through our senses gives us knowledge of our senses, not of unperceived things. Reason does not guarantee that there are, necessarily, unperceived objects. We encounter ideas that do not correspond to external objects in dreams and frenzies.

The argument doesn't recognize the facility of generalization. There are certain kinds of cats in Japan that are different from those common to the US, but the definition of a cat still includes those that differ from our experience with what had been seen in our country.

Japanese Cat

The empiricists were engaged in a struggle to suggest that the common citizen was capable of learning how to argue, but would have to accept Parliamentarian decisions in imperial expansion.

Berkeley accepted the possibility that slavery could be used as a tool for the expansion of civilization, but he wanted to stipulate that it was a temporary phase in the transition for a primitive to a civilized state of existence.

His emphasis was on freedom. Locke and Hume were determinists. Berkeley simply overcompensated in his opposition to the determinist error. He resorted to a form of solipsism in his argument against Locke.

Berkeley asked his audience to suppose that there were an intelligence that was not affected by external bodies. What reason would that intelligence have to believe that bodies external to the mind were exciting those sensations and ideas? None. Knowledge of external objects was actually limited to the knowledge of sensation regarding tangible existence.

He defined the dilemma in The Principles, "In short, if there were external bodies, it is impossible we should ever come to know it; and if there were not, we might have the very same reasons to think there were that we have now."

Sensations were imprinted in the order of experience with like vividness to the ideas of mind described by the person who explained what word was used to describe the sensation as an idea.

Berkeley went so far as to argue that the possibility that intelligence could exist without matter was a proof against the existence of matter.

This was a modern generalization of the monist argument presented by the Eleatics in Italy. If existence doesn't exist except in act of perception, what's the meaning in the raising of dust?

Berkeley was refuting the error in the universalism of Locke's argument. The Irish had a history of dealing with the problem of slavery at least from the time of Pelagius.

Evidence of participation in the slave trade must have increased prior to the time that Berkeley wrote "The Principles of Human Knowledge."

He didn't explicitly argue against the institution. He made the proposal for making manumission a goal during the life of the person who had been enslaved after he had been given instruction in the language and customs of British society.

Education was not recognized as a public institution at the time. The norm throughout Europe was that students were taught how to read with the classics either in Latin if there was proximity to the royal family or in a translation from the Latin texts.

Everyone who had learned to read was given instruction in the myths of Greco-Roman society prior to direct exposure to any translation of the Judeo-Christian scriptures in the Bible. Locke was a Puritan and a Whig.

The Puritans were Calvinists. The Calvinists argued against the monarchy as corrupt in order to push for the institution of republic.

Much of the administrative structure that had been developed by the monarchy with respect for tribal or parish organization was discounted with the definition of corruption. The doctrine of Sola Scriptura lent itself to the identification of classical knowledge as corrupt.

The definition of private property as expressed by the English Bill of Rights did not outlaw slavery.

The Calvinists and Puritans were ruling out large amounts of biblical and classical culture with their rebellion against the crown. The enslavement or exploitation of primitives was allowed. These actions were designated by territory.

Africa was seen as the source for slaves. The natives in the colonies could be driven from their lands with war or militia raids to claim natural resources.

Berkeley was well educated in classical and Christian knowledge. He knew that his argument against triangles was rhetorical. He knew that his argument for particulars was too particular. He knew that his position for immaterialism was subject to the errors of idealism or excess in subjectivity.

He argued against what was wrong about Empiricism because it was prone to large scale abuse in colonial expansion. He agreed with the basic principles of the philosophy because it was elemental with respect for education.

Young students can't be treated as adults who have already been instructed in the elements of the language arts. It is counterproductive to progress in learning how to read the language. They have to be taught to read so they can learn to do it for themselves. Students learn how to argue as they are exposed to argument through that which they read.

Hobbes had identified Parliament as the Leviathan in his work on political philosophy. This was interpreted as support for absolute monarchy by Locke and the Whigs.

Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, James I and Richard Hooker had not argued for absolute power for monarchs. The divine rights of monarchy was derived from the vision of Isaiah for a royal line of succession in the development of the language, culture and economics of society with political leadership. The family line of succession was a component of the royal position.

Berkeley's razor was a rule for reason that proposed to eliminate error as associated with the absolutism of Plato or the universalism of Aristotle or the subsequent scholastic developments that was characteristic of Aquinas.

Experiment played a role in the razor, but the razor suffered from an excess emphasis on the particulars of any given individual's perception.

Berkeley's argument paved the way for the passions of Hume's empiricism that came close to the denial of value in objective knowledge. Causation itself became an essentialist principle that was subject to error in association between cause and effect.

Hume wasn't a great advocate of experiment as a means to resolve dispute. His passion for history suggested that subjective demographics was the means to make determinations for people.

Eleatic monism was deft in the challenge that it presented to describe the perception of the existence of things. It was too disagreeable to any kind of agreement in terms of the refutations of error in the absolutist or universalist philosophical positions.

How were people to agree about anything when the existence of matter was denied as a reality external to mental perception?

----------------------

Providence


John Jay was a Christian. He expressed favor for Christian leadership by election. It was his opinion that the people will do better with leaders who were for the public with the help of the Christian faith.
Free will was a national entity that would best serve and be best served by the majority religion.

When Jay wrote about the dangers of foreign influence as Publius he didn't obsess on defining an enemy as far from our borders as he could. He wrote about trade relations.

His definition of the purpose for government focused on unity in relation to other nations. This unity was concerned with the negotiation of trade for the benefit of the union with respect for international relations.

The causes of war were described in the Federalist Paper #3. "Just" cause was contrasted with pretended. Personal gain by officials for their claim to absolute power was expressed in the rhetoric that justified the war for independence.

Jefferson had documented the argument against 'absolute monarchy' though it was probably known that the House of Commons was most inclined to seek personal gain for reelection by deceptive stories released to the public through the press.

Personal gain was not a just cause for war.

Broken treaties and violent attacks were regarded as a call for defense.

There were only 13 states at the time. The military was largely dedicated to the defense of the borders. The US Army has bases in foreign nations as well as in the continental borders.

Knowledge of the foreign language is necessary if the troops hope to interact with the local population in a friendly and diplomatic way. The current mission for the Army is to assist host nations in operations to counter terrorism.

The position for the support of a professional standing military is compromised by the deceit.

The defense of American citizens in the Middle East is part of that mission only insofar as the 'Christians' or members of other western organizations aren't engaged in subversive action intended to force regime change on the host country.

When political change is forced into action by the threat of the destruction of property or damage those who reside in the borders of the host nation, it is terrorism. When terrorism is used in the war on terror, it conflicts with the operations that counter the criminal offense.

The US Congress has enacted legislation against terrorism. The law includes a provision against terrorist acts in foreign nations.

The protection of property purchased by the US for embassies as well as bases is important, but there are media stories that are purchased by opponents to conservative reform that seek to increase the cost for military ops in foreign lands.

The leftists and liberals are just working to develop a consensus of agreement against reasonable expectation.

They will pay for stories that depict the destruction of property in order to frighten the public into concession to the belief that more tax money has to be spent on the protection of US property. They also want the public to pay for regime change by ISIS and related terrorist organizations.

The leftists would have the public pay for socialism as though it were for Christianity in the Middle East.

The development of a substantive navy during the time of John Jay in the infancy of the country was reflective of what had been done by Spain, the Netherlands and Great Britain. The US was looking at the success of European countries as the basis for forming the new republic.

The Navy was concerned with the protection of trade routes in addition to the defense of the eastern seaboard.

It was the opposition to reasonable development that used the media outlets of the time to rant against reasonable expectation to favor control of the public with fear.

John Jay wrote against absolute monarchy again in the fourth paper. The argument was known to be the Calvinist banner for rebellion, but it was offered by Jay as a call to work for self-determination in the US republic.

Broken treaties and violent action against the safety of the American people was defined as the justification for war. The national government needed to form realistically beneficial treaties for trade in order to avoid the invitation of hostility or insult against safety for the people.

Federalist #4
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1404/1404-h/1404-h.htm#link2H_4_0004

Jay also argued that we didn't want to give just cause for war to other nations. A single national government would provide less cause to foreign powers than the "proposed little confederacies."

Another pretended cause for war was the supposed benefit of national gain from the war. Worse than this was personal gain from violent conflict by an absolute monarch. He didn't explicitly state it, but personal gain for the reelection of elected officials represented a more immediate but a non-explicit threat.

The power of election was advocated as the primary means to test for the will of the people, but the danger of deception by aggressive populist type media campaigns through the press was pronounced.

The "absolute monarch" was offered in literary effigy as a symbol of personal motivations such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition or a private compact to aggrandize  support for their particular families or partisans.

Competition between nations for trade was offered as preferable. France and Britain were rivals in the fisheries. Jay proposed that Americans could provide fish for their markets cheaper than they could themselves.

France, Britain and other European nations were rivals in navigation for the transportation of supplies. The US would need to develop something competitive in the shipping industry for trade as well as a navy to protect travel routes.

The development of trade with China and India would decrease that which had been a monopoly to increase the direct purchase of commodities that used to be purchased from them.

The prices for American products would be kept low to compete with products offered by foreign nations with interests near our borders. The affordability and excellence of our productions added to the circumstance of vicinity to the enterprise and address of our merchants and navigators will give us a greater share in the advantages of national unity.

Spain had excluded American vessels from the Mississippi. Britain had shut down the Saint Lawrence.

Other waters were closed to traffic in between. American advancement in union, power and consequence by land and sea would not be viewed with indifference.

The opening of vital trade routes was a consideration in the development of the national interest. A strong navy would have to be able to defend American trade.

The building of strength for the protection of the union with a good national government was necessary to other nations in a position where war would be discouraged instead of invited. Such a situation insisted on the best possible state of defense with the government, the arms, and the resources of the country.

Safety was in the interest of the whole. It wouldn't be afforded recognition as a value by 3, 4 or even 13 different governments.

One government would collect the talents and experience of the ablest men in whatever part of the Union they were to be found. Movement on uniform principles of policy was to prove purposeful. Harmony, assimilation and protection for the several parts and members was to extend the benefit of its foresight and precautions to each.

The formation of treaties was to regard the particular interests of the parts as connected with that of the whole. It would be able to apply the resources and power of the whole to the defense of any particular part more easily and expeditiously than State governments or separate confederacies.

The militia would be placed under one plan for organization. Officers were to be ordered in rank with respect for the Commander. One military corps would be more efficient than multiple entities.

Where would the unity of the British military be if the English obeyed the government of England, the Scots that of Scotland and the Welsh that of Wales? Would the 3 militias be able to operate as effectively  in defense of the British Isles against the enemy with all their respective forces?

The fleets of Britain had grown to a position of prominence in the world. The US Navy might yet grow to such a position if the nation acted to build such a force.

If one national government had not so regulated the navigation of Britain as to make it a nursery for seamen;  had it not called forth all the national means and materials for forming fleets, their prowess and their thunder would never have been celebrated.

Let England have its navigation and fleet. Let Scotland have its navigation and fleet. Let Wales have its navigation and fleet. Let Ireland have its navigation and fleet. Let those four constituent parts of the British empire be be under four independent governments and it is easy to perceive how soon they would each dwindle into comparative insignificance.

Would you have them run each to their fleets as the lost tribes of Israel had fled to their tents?

The institutional facts for union had to be applied to the consideration of the American republic. If the country remained divided in 13 different states or had they only chosen to organize into regional confederacies, the competition between the distinctive entities would create greater division.

What armies could they raise and pay? What fleets could they ever hope to have? If one was attacked, would the others fly to its support and spend their blood and money in its defense?

Would there be no danger of their being flattered into neutrality by specious promises or seduced by a too great fondness for peace to hazard their tranquility and immediate safety for the sake of neighbors?

This consideration is drawn from the knowledge of political developments documented in the Bible.

The history of a nation extends from the start to the present. The history of nations as seen by reading the Bible presents a larger picture.

Knowledge of classical society is necessary as well. The history of the states of Greece and other countries abounded with instances of alliance refused out of jealousy.  It is probable that what had so often happened as natural would happen again under similar circumstances.

What motivation would admit that they might be willing to help an invaded state or confederacy? How, when and in what proportion should military aid and money be afforded?

Who would command the allied armies? From which of them would he receive his orders? Who would settle the terms of peace?   What mediator would decide between the states and compel acquiescence in case of dispute?

Various difficulties and inconveniences would be inseparable from such a situation.  One government watching over the general and common interests to combine and direct the powers and resources of the whole without dictatorship.

The union would be free from the embarrassment of shortsightedness with a lackluster plan. The plan for a single government would conduce far more to the safety of the people.

Foreign nations will know and view the American situation as it is. They will act in accordance with  one national government or move to take advantage of multiple entities.

If they see that our national government is efficient and well administered; our trade prudently regulated; our militia properly organized and disciplined; our resources and finances discreetly managed; our credit established; and our people free, contented and united, they will be much more disposed to cultivate our friendship than provoke our resentment.

If they find us destitute of an effectual government with each State doing right or wrong as its ruler may seem convenient or split into three or four discordant republics with one inclination to Britain, another to France and a third to Spain, then the foreign powers will play each off against the other by the three.

What a poor, pitiful figure America would make in their eyes! She would become liable to their contempt or outrage. How soon would dear-bought experience proclaim that when a people or family is so divided, it never fails to be against themselves.

----------------------

Corruption


When the working assumption in a two party system is that the other party is the cause of corruption, debate becomes an exercise in futility.

The Dems have detected corruption in their policy, but they blame the president, the Republican party and the American people for representing opposition.

The charges for 'abuse of power' and 'obstruction of Congress' are vague when applied to the president. There is more evidence that Joe Biden was guilty of the abuse of power in Ukraine than Donald Trump.

The president asked for information about the situation in the country. Biden threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid if they didn't fire the investigator who was exploring the actions of the Bidens.

The 'obstruction of Congress' charge begs the question, obstruction from what? Was the support for regime change by the action of ISIS supposed to represent democracy in the US or the Middle East? It was terrorism. There is a national law against terrorist action.

Rights


Modern republic explicitly acknowledges the right to vote for citizens. A number of amendments were added for the recognition that the right extends to women and people of color.

Republican government did not outlaw slavery in the past. Enslavement was considered a freedom for those who could afford to buy and take care of the slave.

Legislation against the trade and the institution was used to rule out the ownership of other people as a right. The push for treaties for the adoption of legislation against slavery by other nation states was promoted by the British parliament in accord with their monarchy.

Jefferson owned slaves and sent American military personnel to fight against the Berbers to defend the American slave trade. This action didn't allow for the right for slaves to be counted as full citizens.

The slaves were counted as part of the population in a way that contributed to the number of representatives that could be elected to Congress, but the 'democracy' was populist as opposed to Republican.

The term Jeffersonian republican was not representative of Republican democracy. It was populist socialism in the spirit of Plato and the Spartan influence on Athenian populism.

Republic provides concepts for debate about government with the constitution. The Demo-dictum works to overrule reasonable debate in order to establish dominance with stories in the leftist media about Republican corruption.

================

Christianity was drawn from Judaism. It was a Roman derivative.

The Romans were against monotheism as a religious form when they destroyed Jerusalem.

Polytheism as a form was tolerant of extraction from primitive tribalism. Much of the world was organized into tribal society at the time.

Kingdom was one step beyond tribalism. Republic saw itself as a step beyond that.

Vespasian sponsored Josephus to draft of a history of Judea in order to preserve a description of the actions that were taken when Judah was a province. Judah had been ahead of the power curve when it came to the adoption of monotheism.

Christianity became sectarian when the status as the official religion of the empire was used to deny legal standing to other religious forms. Polytheism and Judaism were both persecuted.

Judaism and Islam became the "other" monotheistic forms. It was sectarian religion that sought to institute prejudice against the other forms.

There is a legitimate legal concern about other religious forms in the host country. The investiture controversy sought to give the pope the right to choose the bishops for the Church in every kingdom of the empire after the monarchs had been given the right.

Religion that is used to promote riot, terrorism, rebellion, revolution or world war is not legal. It used to be the case that if some were found to be seditious towards national security, the whole group was punished.

Religion has the cultivation of law abiding behavior as a natural purpose. National law against terrorism is a better legislative action than the promotion of sectarian prejudice.